D. S Article: Review Of Milgram's Experiments On Obedience

Improved Essays
Obedience is a quality in which many people attempt to maintain throughout their lives in order for them to avoid any type of negative confrontations with authority figures. In Diana Baumrind’s article, “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, and Ian Parker’s article over “Obedience”, the authors come to an agreement over the comparison between the two variables in Milgram’s experiment appearing to be imperfectly designed to create an effect that potentially altered the results that Milgram had recorded. Parker and Baumrind each unearth evidence supporting a key factor in which a person reacts to orders given by some figure of authority is not based essentially on who a person is as an individual, but the situation that surrounds …show more content…
“The dependent, obedient attitude assumed by most subjects in the experimental setting is appropriate to the situation” (Baumrind 90). As Baumrind states throughout her piece, one of the most important factors that need to be taken into consideration when conducting an experiment such as Milgram’s is the setting in which the experimenter places the subject in order to observe reactions resulting from a series of stimulated events. When one is placed into a situation with an individual that is viewed as a figure of authority, the subject subconsciously regards this person with trust and obedience (Baumrind 90). The obedience experiment demonstrates that people tend to obey orders more willingly when the apparent authority figure is present in the same room, even when the orders are seen as unethical (“Obedience to Authority”). The situation a person is found in and the desire to readily obey orders given by authority is potentially the factors that caused the vulnerability Milgram believes contributed to the rise of the Holocaust and the willingness of the Nazi’s to obey Hitler’s orders to diminish the Jews from Germany. Milgram claims that the Nazi s not only performed such destructive acts because they had been ordered to do so, but because they believed that what they were doing was right (Parker 102). With that being said, Milgram concludes his experimental observations with the claim that obedience to authority is ingrained in all of us from the way we are brought up and this could cause ordinary people to be more likely to follow orders given by an authority figure, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being (“The Milgram Experiment”). Consequently, the parallel between authority-subordinate relationships in Hitler’s Germany and Milgram’s laboratory is unclear

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For obedience, the experimenter would take up more of an authoritarian figure, where the subject felt that he had to comply with the authoritarian personality. The subject already…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The test proved that seemingly normal people are likely to follow orders given by a person of authority even to the extent of killing another because obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. This experiment forced participant to either violate their conscience by obeying immoral demands or not. Milgram’s experiment recruited forty males to take part in the study of “learning” with a total of six hundred thirty-six participants in eighteen separate tests. The participants actually believed they were shocking a real person unaware that the learner was actually acting like being shocked.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nazi soldiers clearly had a lot of influence from the charisma, intimidation, and power of the leader of their country, Adolf Hitler. The Milgram experiment emphasizes that Hitler’s high position of respect and power had a huge impact on their willingness to commit such…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inspired by the horrific acts committed by thousands of seemingly “normal” individuals during the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram set out to discover the causes and triggers of unquestioning obedience. He inquired why so many people from uneventful backgrounds followed orders from the most tyrannical and prejudice leader ever facing this world. Basing his theory from that of a grade school friend and famous situationist—Philip Zimbardo—Milgram began to explore the possibility of a situation to force a person to act in opposition of their deepest values and morals. His curiosity resulted in the perpetually debated Milgram Obedience Experiments.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people have the idea that during WW1 Nazis killed and tortured many Jews freely and even willingly. What Milgram is doing in his experiment is trying to figure out how easily people follow orders, orders that could harm and potentially kill someone. Milgram got participants through a newspaper article, and paying them $450 to complete the experiment (random sampling). The experiment was carried out in a lab at Yale, causing ecological validity to be good, as it 's a very trustworthy institution and subjects are more likely to abide when in a laboratory compared to a real world setting. He was using a deceiving method by tricking the “teacher” to believe that every time he flipped a set of 30 switches, which were ranged from Slight Shock…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    1975 Milgram Experiment

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1975 Milgram directed an experiment to study whether the Nazi killings in world war II carried out by the Germans, was due to the fact that the Germans were obedient to authority figures as this was the most common justification. Milgram devised the experiment to answer the question "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices? The acts committed of the genocide at World War II were scrutinised and studied. How far were people willing to take orders and carry them out even if it involved harming another person and how easily were they influenced?…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without authority to tell these people how to look, act, and think, they would not know how to go on. This acceptance is the essence of obedience, which Milgram describes as when “the action carried out does not correspond to the motives of the actor, but is initiated in the motive system of those higher up in the social hierarchy” (Milgram 1974, 166). Milgram’s experiments not only described this blind obedience, but also explained why people obey so…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Experiment In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram (1993-1984) began an experiment that would test to see how obedient people would be no matter the circumstances. One experiment Milgram performed consisted of volunteers shocking someone they did not know if he or she did not answer a question correctly. As the questions are answered incorrectly, the voltage would rise. Unknown to the volunteer, the subject that is being shocked is an actor that is not being electrocuted, and the volunteer was the subject of the experiment. As the experiment continued, the volunteers began to become stressed (Taylor, Peplau, & Sears, 2005, p. 228).…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram was an American social psychologist, who was known for his obedience experiment performed in the 1960s at Yale University. Milgram’s idea on purposing his experiment first came from the hideous acts of WWII. Milgram examined how individuals had the tendency to obey higher authority, such as Hitler, and still contain harmful acts on others, just because they were ordered to do so. According to Milgram (1963) he also believed that in some situations, that human propensity to “obey is so deeply ingrained and powerful that it cancels out a person’s ability to behave morally, ethically or even sympathetically”(p.306). Overall from these investigations Milgram decided to implicate on obedience to authority.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays