Throughout the vast majority of human history, governments have provided a multitude of services, protection and guidance to their citizens. These services have come at some sort of cost to citizens, while others are given (seemingly) freely. However, these services and protections have not always been available to all of a state’s citizens. Much has changed over the years in governments. Most of this change has happened in the last 100 or so years for the
United States government. Women’s suffrage, the civil rights movement, gay rights as well as freedoms like free speech and freedom from violence and oppression and are just a few of the rights that have been granted by the government. These rights and freedoms do come at a cost,
however. …show more content…
These trends and actions have made it very difficult for local, state and national government to ensure the freedoms and rights of citizens are safeguarded while simultaneously maintaining order. This is the conundrum of balancing freedom, rights and order.
Maintaining order is the oldest purpose and objective of a government (Janda, et al,
2014). Without order, there really could not be any guarantee of freedoms or rights because there would be no way of regulating citizens and private entities to prevent the infringement of given freedoms and rights. When order is viewed in the sense of preserving life and protecting property, the majority of citizens would agree that order (and consequently government) is good
(Janda, et al, 2014). On the contrary, when order is viewed in the sense of censorship, regulation and maintaining social order, most people are likely to be against this order or government
(Janda, et al, 2014). For many centuries and even millennia, maintaining order has been relatively simple. It wasn’t until the formation of a global economy, major …show more content…
Bill C-51 is a federal anti-terrorism legislation that hopes to bring the people of Canada more personal security and freedom from harm while also safeguarding their “freedom of expression,” which is distinctly different from the United
States’ “freedom of speech.” Canadian government believes in the fact that a government’s intervention must be justified in its effort to advance freedom and consequently, equality and justice (Leuprecht, 2015). Bill C-51 would expand the scope and reach of the Security
Intelligence Review Committee as well as expedite the process in order to safeguard citizens and systems in an efficient manner, before it’s too late. The proposal raises the eyebrow of critics who ask the fundamental question of, “Who is watching the watchers?” (Leuprecht, 2015). How will this increase in the government’s power be checked to ensure that it does not begin to infringe upon the people’s constitutional rights?
On an international level, the United Nations has formed a Commission on Human Rights in order to provide human rights internationally and ensure that the rights are enforced. This is certainly no easy task at an international level when very few countries have been able to do
United States government. Women’s suffrage, the civil rights movement, gay rights as well as freedoms like free speech and freedom from violence and oppression and are just a few of the rights that have been granted by the government. These rights and freedoms do come at a cost,
however. …show more content…
These trends and actions have made it very difficult for local, state and national government to ensure the freedoms and rights of citizens are safeguarded while simultaneously maintaining order. This is the conundrum of balancing freedom, rights and order.
Maintaining order is the oldest purpose and objective of a government (Janda, et al,
2014). Without order, there really could not be any guarantee of freedoms or rights because there would be no way of regulating citizens and private entities to prevent the infringement of given freedoms and rights. When order is viewed in the sense of preserving life and protecting property, the majority of citizens would agree that order (and consequently government) is good
(Janda, et al, 2014). On the contrary, when order is viewed in the sense of censorship, regulation and maintaining social order, most people are likely to be against this order or government
(Janda, et al, 2014). For many centuries and even millennia, maintaining order has been relatively simple. It wasn’t until the formation of a global economy, major …show more content…
Bill C-51 is a federal anti-terrorism legislation that hopes to bring the people of Canada more personal security and freedom from harm while also safeguarding their “freedom of expression,” which is distinctly different from the United
States’ “freedom of speech.” Canadian government believes in the fact that a government’s intervention must be justified in its effort to advance freedom and consequently, equality and justice (Leuprecht, 2015). Bill C-51 would expand the scope and reach of the Security
Intelligence Review Committee as well as expedite the process in order to safeguard citizens and systems in an efficient manner, before it’s too late. The proposal raises the eyebrow of critics who ask the fundamental question of, “Who is watching the watchers?” (Leuprecht, 2015). How will this increase in the government’s power be checked to ensure that it does not begin to infringe upon the people’s constitutional rights?
On an international level, the United Nations has formed a Commission on Human Rights in order to provide human rights internationally and ensure that the rights are enforced. This is certainly no easy task at an international level when very few countries have been able to do