According to Grafton, Vespucci inherits classical scholarly tradition about what lies at the edges of the world, depicting his America as full of both “happy, naked savages, and evil, threatening cannibals”, a description familiar from scholarly tradition (83). Future editors of Vespucci’s letters on the Americas developed this idea even further, distorting facts like how many human bodies a cannibal consumes in order to emphasize the barbarity of the native population. Vespucci’s New World is therefore, as Grafton says, a marvelous but also monstrous place to visit. Additionally, Grafton argues that Vespucci uses the technique of alienation, as classical authors like Herodotus did before him, in order to paint a picture of the New World as a place utterly foreign to a European sense of mind (84). Consequently, Grafton’s theory depicts Herodotus and Vespucci as having relatively similar content and
According to Grafton, Vespucci inherits classical scholarly tradition about what lies at the edges of the world, depicting his America as full of both “happy, naked savages, and evil, threatening cannibals”, a description familiar from scholarly tradition (83). Future editors of Vespucci’s letters on the Americas developed this idea even further, distorting facts like how many human bodies a cannibal consumes in order to emphasize the barbarity of the native population. Vespucci’s New World is therefore, as Grafton says, a marvelous but also monstrous place to visit. Additionally, Grafton argues that Vespucci uses the technique of alienation, as classical authors like Herodotus did before him, in order to paint a picture of the New World as a place utterly foreign to a European sense of mind (84). Consequently, Grafton’s theory depicts Herodotus and Vespucci as having relatively similar content and