The main goal was to eradicate dog aggression, but all it served to do is create and foster a prejudice and discrimination of these breeds. I find it completely and utterly wrong instead of being behavior specific, it imposes stiff regulations towards certain breeds. In the article “Breed-Specific Legislation-Barking Up the Wrong Tree” Anthony Abordo raises a great point” what constitutes an aggressive dog? Here, advocates look to dog bite statistics by breed, judging that those breeds responsible for the majority of dog bites are inherently dangerous, which leads to the conclusion that one must ban or least restrict ownership of
The main goal was to eradicate dog aggression, but all it served to do is create and foster a prejudice and discrimination of these breeds. I find it completely and utterly wrong instead of being behavior specific, it imposes stiff regulations towards certain breeds. In the article “Breed-Specific Legislation-Barking Up the Wrong Tree” Anthony Abordo raises a great point” what constitutes an aggressive dog? Here, advocates look to dog bite statistics by breed, judging that those breeds responsible for the majority of dog bites are inherently dangerous, which leads to the conclusion that one must ban or least restrict ownership of