The Challenger Disaster

Decent Essays
The Challenger disaster is a tragic example of contradicting proper management and engineering decisions. The management on the The Space Center were informed about Morton Thiokol engineers recommendation againts launching Challenger space shuttle. Unfortunately, The Space Center chose to ignore that option. Vice president of Morton Thiokol, only considering about business profit, even persuaded the supervising engineer at that time to “take off your engineering hat and put on your management hat.”
I believe that engineers and scientists have some degree of responsibility to ensure that their user make decisions regarding their product with understanding, especially understanding of their consequences. In this Challenger case, this applies

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This speech was written by Ronald Reagan in response to the Challenger Disaster which took place on January 28, 1986 in the Oval Office. This was done to mourn the seven who died in the disaster. This was spoken to the citizens of the United States along with the families of those who died in the disaster and NASA. This speech was the right thing to do because Reagan addressed the people of the United States, stated his emotions with the disaster, and insured people this lose wasn't for nothing.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Challenger was a horrible tragedy the american public had to witness, but we as a country will not let it get in the way of our future accomplishments. The Challenger was a spacecraft that exploded on January 28, 1986 while its departure to space along with 7 crew members inside. The president of the United States, Ronald Reagan, then delivered the “Address To The Challenger Disaster” to the nation and the crew members families. Reagan crafted the speech to let everyone know they were grieving for the brave crew members but to also let them know we will not let such a disaster stop us from exploring space. Reagan's credibility is the fact he is the United States president, he makes the speech personal by saying “we”…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NASA Challenger STS 51-L accident is an archetypal example of a disaster with no clear scapegoat. While it is easy to simply blame the management for disregarding engineers’ warnings about the safety of the mission, this analysis of the Challenger Disaster is erroneous because it fails to consider other factors such as a flawed communication system. In order to comprehensively analyze the ethical violations that led to the Challenger accident, we must consider the scenario holistically. This means we must take into account not only the mistake of some engineers who did not strongly protest the launch and management who did not heed the engineers’ warnings, but also the tense atmosphere surrounding the launch of Challenger in addition to the flaws of the structure of the NASA communication system. By rigorously and completely analyzing the Challenger situation, we can then formulate preventive measures for future missions based upon the ethical violations that occurred on the Challenger mission in order to minimize the possibility of human, economic, dignity, and safety loss for missions in the future.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thank you for sharing this article enjoyed when it mentions, “that smart people working collectively can be dumber than the sum of their brains.” What a simple statement, but packed with so much meaning.…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On January 28, 1986, the Challenger Explosion stunned the world which changed NASA forever. All seven astronauts aboard the Challenger died. The Challenger Explosion occurred 73 seconds after blasting off. It was the first time a space vehicle of the United States exploded with crew on board. NASA suspended its 1986 launch schedule until they figured out why Challenger exploded. On the Challenger, there was an area of concern in which there was an amount of ice before takeoff on the launch pad. Overnight, temperatures went to a low of 24 degrees and the wind chill reached a low of 10 at the height of the launch tower which was 250 feet. Icicles were present in various places of the launch pad. The launch of the Challenger was put on hold and…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Groupthink is led by the influence from authority and peers. Groups grow to think alike and become convinced there is only one “right” viewpoint. Groups think it is disloyal to take suggestions for alternatives. Groups have narrow perspective and most likely believe they are fully right.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Vaughan,Diane., 1996, ‘The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA’, Published by University of Chicago Press; 1 edition (April 15,1997).To sum up, the Challenger shuttle disaster was famous for NASA’s unfaithful and negligence over the project in the 20th century. The Challenger shuttle disaster, not only due to its destruction causing the dead, but the poor management at NASA, which damaged NASA’s reputation. Perrow (1999) explores the O-ring seal erosion of SRB was one technical issue that caused the Challenger disaster, and Vaughan (1996) argues that the “change is bad” culture of NASA management was the human issue that caused normalization of deviations. Vaughan (1996) argues that managers and engineers…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Lusitania Disaster

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For both the Lusitania disaster and 9/11 attacks, the historic phase came immediately. In the Lusitania disaster, help took several hours and unfortunately by then many had succumbed to hypothermia or drowning. Local fishermen helped recover bodies, find the unaccounted for and bodies were laid to rest in Queenstown following the disaster, with a memorial to commemorate the victims. Immediately after reports of the 9/11 attacks first responders raced to save as many people as possible from the towers and the pentagon. Heroic passengers on flight 93, unfortunately unable to save themselves risked their lives and subdued hijackers deterring the plane from crashing into another occupied landmark. The honeymoon phase also happened quite quickly…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “ I have seen with my own eyes the tragic explosion of the space shuttle Challenger. It was one of the worst things i have ever seen in my life. I have heard gunfire and bombs exploding around me as a child. I have lived through natural disasters such as hurricanes and earthquakes. Through all of this, I am grateful for living in the United States and having the opportunities I have been given. I am thankful for having survived living in a war torn nation, and I am grateful for having just celebrated my 80th…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Challenger Explosion

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Commander, we have a problem we're goin down”! Something has attacked from inside, the plant serum spilled and…” “Screech” This is the recording of inside the rocket challenger before its explosion. Tragically, about 31 years ago in 1986 the rocket challenger was launched purposely into space into space, along with it a slimy growth hormone for plants that were undergoing experiments, also a bird was taken to study the effects of space on animals. Later on that exploration the rocket was faced with tragical technical difficulties that no one can explain, all that is known is something was heard to be raging with an ever growing growl and then minutes later an explosion was seen all across the earth. Ever heard of the Challenger well that's the story behind that most don't know that scientist won't reveal to the public. Researchers do know that something dangerous is out there lurking in deep space. During the heartbreaking recovery stage of that tragic rocket, what is believed to be called an ongoing explosion of planets and stars was seen. Other reports have shown murky pictures of what appears to…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The hindenburg was a large blimp that transported people over the atlantic. It was the fastest way to get across the atlantic at the time, and was significant to air technology. On it’s last flight in 1937, disaster struck, ending rigid airship transportation.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some facts before the Hindenburg crashed and what caused it, When they filled up the Hindenburg with food and water it got to heavy and they had to throw out some things so they could land safely. A spark is the reason the Hindenburg caught fire and crashed. The reason the Hindenburg crashed was because a spark hit a hydrogen box and then it filled the ventilation ducts with fire and it spread everywhere and the Hindenburg caught fire and crashed. There have been some theory’s to why the Hindenburg crashed and burned like hydrogen leaked through everything and burned the whole place down, or an electric problem happened. But the conclusion was a spark hit a hydrogen tank and caught fire.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gary Allison, a legitimate and regarded venture designer of Scientific Engineering Corporation (SEC), was given the part of turning into the undertaking chief over the Orion Shield Project. SEC was in competition for the R & D Phase project of the Orion Shield Program. Who is Henry Larsen? He is the director of engineering, who hired this inexperienced person to lead an extensive project. Larsen needed an unpracticed project manager (PM) who would be effortlessly controlled and who might acknowledge his "unscrupulous management gauges". Among the numerous unfriendly choices and slip-ups made by Gary was his absence of correspondence and trustworthiness with the partners included with the task. In the event that Gary would host been additionally…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The task at hand is to outline or demonstrate the ignorance of a professional engineer with regards to the public health and safety and how this in overturn adversely affected or impacted the engineering outcome. Briefly a professional (a profession) by simpler definition is personnel who have a strong foundation in the principals of physics and exercise sound judgment when designing and analyzing such systems (Young, Michael; M&Y consultants and trainers (PTY) Ltd, 2016). There are attributes to which this definition extends (Fleddermann, 2008). Engineers, as other professions, are necessary to the functioning of society. They hold paramount the duties and responsibilities to society and have obligations in performing these duties by doing the right thing (they must act morally in their role as engineers), despite any cost (e.g. losing a job). The guidelines to adhere to these moral rules are outlined in the Engineering Code of Conduct or Ethics (which the details are subjected to repealing by any registered professional engineer) (Aarne, 2010), (ECSA Council, 2013), (Fleddermann, 2008).…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The engineers who designed and operated Chernobyl violated our code of ethics on many levels the failed to see the well being of other as a paramount. Although the engineers violate many parts of the code of ethics two parts I particular were Professional Engineers Ontario Code of Ethics, Section 77 of the O. Reg. 941 2(i) and 6. Two (i) states “A practitioner shall, regard the practitioner 's duty to public welfare as paramount” . This basically means that the engineer must regards the safety and general wellbeing of the public as of the heist importance. This was violated was the water coolant system which when the power was reduced switched of so the diesel turbine could take over but for a small amount of time the original turbine was winding down and so no enough water was being pumped. Two (i) was violated again when the chief engineer continued the experiment with low power and low water supply. These are only a few examples of how the engineer’s violated 2(i) but the provided sufficient evidence that they designing and operating engineers were no following under a code of ethics and were only determined to get the job done and produce as much energy as they could. Six states “A practitioner must co-operate in working with other professionals engaged on a project.”. Six was also violated during…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays