INTRODUCTION: People love consistency. Consistency is comforting; and it is pleasant to know what to expect when certain events occur. For example, when something goes up it comes down; and we are all happy to agree that this is due to the defining nature of gravity. If you see an object going upwards, you can safely expect it to take a similar trajectory back down to the ground; and you’d be right to do so under most circumstances. Unless of course you are talking about self-siphoning beads. The phenomena of self-siphoning beads, sometimes referred to as “The Chain Fountain”, is one that confounds many eyes upon first sight. One would expect a chain of beads spilling out of a beaker to simply roll over the edge and fall to the ground. However,
…show more content…
Different containers used to test the influence of the beaker on the chain fountain effect
The logic behind the different choices of containers was to answer two primary questions:
(1) How does the diameter of the opening effect the formation/behavior of the chain siphoning? (2) How does the height of the container effect the formation/behavior of the chain siphoning? The selection of containers above contains three different categories of container, each of which was tested at different heights and with different chains. The three categories are: Tall Large Opening container, Tall Small Opening container, and Short Large Opening container. To determine how the vertical distance from the floor effects the chain fountain, testing was performed at three different heights. The first group of tests were performed at a height of 44 inches (~3.6 feet) from the side of a table: Figure 3. Test setup for Test location …show more content…
It was described that the chain must make a looped path to change direction during which is was projected above the lip of the beaker. This explanation, however, is incorrect and the real explanation depends on a force one might be quick to miss. Essentially, the spiraling siphoning effect is a result of not only the pulling of the chain but the pushing of the beads off the bottom of the pile. If we imagine each link of the change being modeled like this one below, each upward pull of the chain not only pulls the link up but also induces a
Different containers used to test the influence of the beaker on the chain fountain effect
The logic behind the different choices of containers was to answer two primary questions:
(1) How does the diameter of the opening effect the formation/behavior of the chain siphoning? (2) How does the height of the container effect the formation/behavior of the chain siphoning? The selection of containers above contains three different categories of container, each of which was tested at different heights and with different chains. The three categories are: Tall Large Opening container, Tall Small Opening container, and Short Large Opening container. To determine how the vertical distance from the floor effects the chain fountain, testing was performed at three different heights. The first group of tests were performed at a height of 44 inches (~3.6 feet) from the side of a table: Figure 3. Test setup for Test location …show more content…
It was described that the chain must make a looped path to change direction during which is was projected above the lip of the beaker. This explanation, however, is incorrect and the real explanation depends on a force one might be quick to miss. Essentially, the spiraling siphoning effect is a result of not only the pulling of the chain but the pushing of the beads off the bottom of the pile. If we imagine each link of the change being modeled like this one below, each upward pull of the chain not only pulls the link up but also induces a