I learned the most, not from my Evaluation Strategy, but from having the opportunity to mark my peer’s Evaluation Strategy. I was determined to the best job marking the paper so I meticulously went through every detail. I realized it wasn’t about giving her a grade but about showing ways that could really improve the assignment. I wanted to ensure I was not misleading and right with my advice. Improving teaching methods is an ongoing process that requires the whole learning community. I enjoyed the whole peer review process since it involved seeing the work my co-learners were producing and also sharing different ways to improve our assignments. It is a lot different than collaborative works, that I have done in the past, because usually everyone does a chunk of the work and the others usually only correct for grammar errors. Peer review involved giving real constructive criticism that would affect the other person’s standing, so I had to make sure my recommendations were …show more content…
I now know that if you ask good questions you will get good answers. My initial pre-assessment questions were too vague and I would not have gotten the answers I expected. I wanted to find out about my learners background knowledge but I might have only gotten one word or short answers. I also like the fact that the pre-assessment questions help prepare the learners for what is expected in the learning outcomes. I now know that learners might not be the best evaluators of course content and the questions that are asked at the end of a course are influence more by enjoyment than