Pro Electoral College

Superior Essays
Since the creation of the United States of America, the Electoral College has been the decider of who becomes the next president. Each state, as well as the District of Columbia, is assigned a certain number of electors based on population and two senators, adding up to 538 for the nation. When one votes at a polling station, they are not directly voting for the president. Instead, they are voting for a particular elector that will then vote for the president. Whichever candidate wins the majority of the electoral votes wins the presidency. Most of the time, electors cast their vote for the person who wins the popular vote in their state, but this is not always the case. This is no law that forces the electors to follow this; consequently some …show more content…
For example, Wyoming gets the equivalence of 5.1 electors per million while California only gets 1.4 (National Archives and Records Administration). This means a single vote in Wyoming is worth over three times more than a Californian one, which gives a candidate the ability to win the Electoral College while losing the popular vote. This is mostly due to the two senatorial votes that each state is given. Those 2 votes account for over half of the states voting power while it is only around 4 percent of California’s. This creates an unequal say among people of different states. This could also lead to a victory in popular vote that also results as an electoral vote loss. In a country founded off of freedom, equality, and fair representation in the Government for all citizens, this system is undoubtedly …show more content…
Federalist paper 10 states the fear and damage that political factions can cause (Madison). Since the candidates fight over each state that only votes for one party, the individual votes for third-parties are considered wasted. Thus, citizens think that they can only vote for a republican or democrat nominee. The Electoral College forces the U.S. into two parties which greatly limits the variety for president. The country has been driven to choose between far left and far right candidates with no chance of choosing a president who is in the middle of the political spectrum. The members of these two parties know this and would be hostile to a change in the electing system. There is no need to abolish the Electoral College completely; it only needs revision. Instead of grouping the electors of each state together in a “winner take all” situation, assign each electoral vote to equally sized districts of a state. Each voting district should have the same population in order to keep it congruent with the popular vote. This will fix the problem of unequal spending and visits to areas, as each area is worth the same. This way every citizens’ vote is equal, as the founding fathers intended rights in the country to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College is consisted of electors, from each state, that cast their ballots for president and vice president. The election for president is consisted of a vote from Congress, and by popular vote of citizens. In order for the president to be elected, there needs to be a majority vote of 270 electoral votes. If that majority is not met, then the election is given to the majority vote determined by the people. In the Electoral College each state gets two senators…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    citizens vote on who they would like to be president. Despite the fact that their votes are not the deciding factor. The Electoral College is a system set where “Each state is awarded as many delegates as it has members of the House and Senate” combined (text, p. 63). This totals to be 538 votes total which results in 270 votes needed for a candidate to win the election. The Electoral College was meant to combine participation of citizens, legislatures, and the state.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens make up the state, so if you do not have citizens you would not have states. Then if we were to get rid of the Electoral College; then the candidates would pay attention to other states more than they do now. They are more worried about the winner take all system that they ignore the state they already know their vote for them. Which disenfranchises voter who supported the losing candidates. This system favors some citizens over others, which denies some people their choice of president.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many Americans are requesting that the Electoral College be abolished due to inconsistencies, for example: The Electoral College votes are not equally dispersed for each state, or someone could become President by winning only 21.8% of the popular vote, and the swing states vs the safe states which can favor one candidate over the…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College should be abolished because: smaller states are over represented, it is undemocratic, and it violates political equality. The Electoral College should be archaic. Essentially, there happens to be no need for it. It was established on basis of that people did not know what or who they were voting for and voted just because they could. Now-a-days, people transpire to be further educated and are able to establish the right decision on who the president should be.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All the effort that they went to in order to make sure that the president would not be elected based off of just popular votes would have gone to waste. They would probably fear that uneducated voters would be a large portion of the voter turnout. This may end up resulting in a president who may not have the best qualifications to serve as a leader for the…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Vote

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Background information on the Electoral College is that state is given a set amount of electors and they are based upon the votes. If one side of the political party, for example the democrats has the higher vote, than the electors for that state are democrats. The same goes for republicans and so the winning political party, either democratic or republican, represents the whole state despite the variation in votes. Once each state has their electors, a debate goes on to elect the president. In the case of the election sixteen years ago, George W. Bush went up against Al Gore and Bush lost the popular vote, however, due to the Electoral College, he was able to become President because the 270 electoral votes were voted toward Bush instead of Gore.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Instead, the government is focusing on power for the states when that should be inconsequential. The concentration of votes within a certain state should not matter because it is the total vote of the people nationally that should determine who will be president. Which state the votes come from does not matter. On the other hand, voting is one of the most important individual rights given to the people. Voting is ranked alongside the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If neither has the majority of electoral votes, in a presidential election, then the House of Representatives chooses the next president. The Winner-Take-All method has many negative effects. One negative effect is that all states are not treated equally. Swing states, also called battleground states, have an almost equal amount of supporters for both major party candidates. As a result, both candidates focus more on campaigning in these states than in others.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s a waste of time. With a popular election, yes they would go to the battleground states but it would force them to reach more of the American people for them to dominate a state to receive as many votes as they can from that state, and more people would come out and vote from a state. Having only the candidate go to a few states does not really get people to go out and vote for them. If someone wants to become the president of the United States, then they represent all of Americans. If the candidate only go to the few states that they call battleground states, then it seems the other states are irrelevant.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays