Genetically Modified Foods Argumentative Analysis

Decent Essays
When considering genetically modified (GM) organisms with the likes of its organic counterpart on a macroscopic view, there is almost no difference between the natural occurring organism and the GM organism. In contrast, the microscopic view, which takes into consideration factors like DNA sequences and other cellular components, provides subtle differences between genetically modified organisms and naturally occurring organisms. One subfield of GM organisms that gets constant recognition is genetically modified foods. There is only one question: how safe are genetically modified foods to eat? Henry Miller and Gregory Conko say that GM foods are safe for the consumer and better for the environment (2006, 232). Jeffery Smith argues that genetically modified foods put the health of individuals at risk and should no longer fall into the hands of the consumer (2007, 240). After taking into consideration arguments of both sides of the topic, Miller and Conko effectively make the case for why genetically modified foods are safe to eat. Miller and Conko start their argument by citing just how important food safety is to the consumer. While acknowledging that technology has paved the way for food cultivators to incorporate GM organics …show more content…
Henry Miller and Gregory Conko make an effective argument through innovations made by GM crop technology on why they are safe to eat. While Jeffery Smith remains highly critical of the genetically modified food movement, he falls short of convincing his audience on why GM foods should be abandoned entirely. Smith’s argument cites probabilities and unclear associations with his major push against GM foods, which are the adverse health risks to humans and other animals. Miller and Conko surpass the inaccuracies of James Smith’s argument, and provide merit to why GM foods are safe to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Although GM foods do have a lot of positive aspect to it and are possibly going to be even better in the future. I still believe that they should be labeled.I don’t think the government and GMO companies should be deciding what we should know about our food. If the food is safe and has almost no difference from organic food they might as well label it. When they do not label it, it makes it seem like they are trying to hide something from us People should have a choice in what they eat and feed their…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Most GM produce have been developed to produce the introduction of resistance to plant diseases or of increased tolerance to herbicides. There is a dispute if the government should make labeling GM foods mandatory for companies. Those who are not in favor of mandatory labeling feel this way because mandatory labeling will falsely make the GMO foods appear to be unsafe, as supported by the Boston Globe, and there is no need for mandatory labeling because the FDA already checks our food. There are those who feel labeling GM foods should be mandatory because of the customers’ right to know what is in their food, as shown through an ABC poll, and mandatory labeling will lead to less production of GMOs, as proven by Dr. Byrne. While there are ways to support both sides, it is clear that labeling GM foods should be mandatory for food companies because of ethical purposes, supported by Paul Ramsey, scientific benefits, shown through Andrew Starbird, and GM food’s possibility to cause allergies, illustrated through Jon Entine’s investigation of an article in Elle magazine written by Caitlin Shetterly.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gmo Labeling Pros And Cons

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In fact, US law legislature mandates food labeling only when the GM food differs significantly from traditionally grown food in terms of nutrition value or safety. And The US government does regulate GM food. After they are approved after trials and experiments, they are deemed to be just as safe as food produced using traditional methods (Byrne, 2010). Simply put, not only does mandatory labeling not change the fact that the food is safe or…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When really genetically modified foods are becoming geared towards the consumers with many benefits such as increased resistance to herbicides and pests. In the article “Joe Regenstein Touts Benefits of GMOs”, by Amanda Boswerth, it mainly favors the use of Genetically Modified Organisms over the disuse. The author writes about how people are just scared of something new, and to the people that think Genetically Modified Organism are unnatural and dangerous, he sais that agriculture has never been natural, which if you think about it, that is true. The author goes on to say arguments for the affirmation include the increase of vitamins, increasing crop yields, and producing weather producing plants. This article should be looked at as a good source because the article was written as an interview.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The goal is to achieve a more desired trait, (GMO Foods Should Be Labeled). Many people do not understand GMOs and what they are. This is part of the issue. According to Scientific American GMOs are “used modern tools to insert a gene here or tweak a gene there, helping the crops tolerate drought and resist herbicides.” Also many anti-GMO activists are using the fight against GMSs to show their concerns about larger agribusiness problems (Reiley). People are also against GMOs because they want the food they buy to represent their beliefs and what they value.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gmo Research Paper

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The information on genetically modified organisms is divisive. However, people are not divided on the issue of starvation and malnutrition; everyone wants it to end. The two are closely related because it is scientifically proven that GMOs can do a lot to end those devastating issues when given the chance. The problem that interferes is the widespread panic about the alleged dangers of genetic engineering. Many are concerned that there are negative effects to their health and to the environment.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We cannot put our health at risks just because we want foods with higher levels of nutrients or longer shelf life. It is a good idea to require GM food labeling because it is our right to know what contains in our foods. However, it is better to ban GM foods to avoid them causing negative effects. Requiring GM food labeling can eliminate the health risks of GM foods since we can choose not to eat GM foods, but it cannot prevent the environmental and economic impacts. Therefore, the production of GM foods should be…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But the evidence shown by these studies is alarming, and when it’s considered how much the people do not know, even scary. The labeling of GM food is misleading because of the idea the FDA likes to reiterate that GM crops are the same as their organic counterparts (Emma). Therefore, they don’t see specific labeling necessary. What the FDA considers dangerous is dishonest and influenced by different factors than just the general health of the American citizens (Emma). With GMOs, it is all a big business and money runs it.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Modifying plants to withstand harsh chemicals and weather conditions are one of the main benefits of GMO. That is one the main solutions to maintain our future food supply regardless of climate change, growing population and unforeseen natural disaster. Lack of diversity is a major issue in GMO and Sandel talks about that in sex selection part of the paper. Sandel offers a solution to stop parents from selecting the gender of their child by not allowing them to screen or pick a gender for the first and second child but can screen for a third child. The same logic can be used to maintain diversity with Genetically Modified Foods.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Gmos

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This principle states that whenever a certain activity imposes a threat to the environment or human health, measures will be enforced even if it is not officially scientifically proven. Falkner continues to discuss the precautionary principle as how most of the EU stands without having that potential risk. As far as we know, GMOs are not harmful. Mark Lynas, the a British author specializing in climate change, discusses his story on how he was an activist against the production of GM food; after he became more informed about the benefits outweighing the costs, he realized the scientific breakthrough scientist had in the palms of their hands. GM decrease the use of agrichemicals and pesticides, which are far more harmful than using the effort to genetically modify food.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays