The categorical grouping of criminal personality are diversified and difficult to identify because of the multiplicity of behaviors. The behavioral psychologist and researchers place the determinants of criminal personality in groups; psychosocial, cognitive, personality development, and environmental. There were much confusion in the past diagnosing this antisocial personality disorder/ psychopathy stemming from period of the DSM-I, 1952 to the DSM-5 today. In studies done by multiple researchers have verified the traits of the psychosocial variables that contributes to the development of the criminal personality type that knowingly engage in criminal acts. The media keeps society well informed of varies account of both sexes who commits
…show more content…
Using the Freudian notion, that criminality is a result of a hedonistic human instinct to seek pleasure. Which is the Id—that is mediated by the conscience, or condition fear response known as the superego. The important factor for Eysenck is a person’s condition ability, which is how well they respond to and internalize the deterrent of criminal activity (e.g., jail, criminal record, public humiliation, etc.). Eysenck used the factor analysis method in his research, which is a statistical procedure that is used to uncover relationships between many variables but instead, he used two dimensions of personality which he described as supertraits: The first was extraversion-introversion; the extravert is seen as an out-going, sociable, dominant in their interpersonal relationships, impulsive, and very expressive in communication. According to Eysenck, it stems from optimal cortical arousal which also, they can be under aroused or overly aroused and become easily frustrated. The introvert, on the other hand, is more responsible and a less risk taker. The second supertrait is Neuroticism stability: The neurotic individual is highly emotional, and either anxious or depressed. The show signs of obsession, suffer low self-esteem, feeling of guilt, and lack a sense of personal autonomy. Neurotic experience a high rate of illness, and …show more content…
The essential features of antisocial personality is a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others. This behavior begin in childhood or early adolescence (age 15 years) and continues into adulthood. The diagnostic criteria, is located on (pages, 659- 662, 1-7): B. The individual at least age 18 years. C. There is evidence of conduct disorder with onset before age 18years. D. The occurrence of antisocial behavior is not exclusively during the course of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The prevalence rate of antisocial personality behavior is 12 months the most severe is male with alcohol and drug use. The developmental and course in antisocial personality disorder has a chronic course but may become less evident or retreat as the individual grows older. Risk and prognosis factor- genetic-psychological- the antisocial disorder is more common among first-degree biological relatives of those with the disorder than the general population. The risk to the biological relatives of female with the disorder tends to be higher than the risk to biological male with the disorder. Culture-related diagnosis issue-appears to be related to low socioeconomic status than urban settings. Gender-related diagnostic issues is that the disorder
Using the Freudian notion, that criminality is a result of a hedonistic human instinct to seek pleasure. Which is the Id—that is mediated by the conscience, or condition fear response known as the superego. The important factor for Eysenck is a person’s condition ability, which is how well they respond to and internalize the deterrent of criminal activity (e.g., jail, criminal record, public humiliation, etc.). Eysenck used the factor analysis method in his research, which is a statistical procedure that is used to uncover relationships between many variables but instead, he used two dimensions of personality which he described as supertraits: The first was extraversion-introversion; the extravert is seen as an out-going, sociable, dominant in their interpersonal relationships, impulsive, and very expressive in communication. According to Eysenck, it stems from optimal cortical arousal which also, they can be under aroused or overly aroused and become easily frustrated. The introvert, on the other hand, is more responsible and a less risk taker. The second supertrait is Neuroticism stability: The neurotic individual is highly emotional, and either anxious or depressed. The show signs of obsession, suffer low self-esteem, feeling of guilt, and lack a sense of personal autonomy. Neurotic experience a high rate of illness, and …show more content…
The essential features of antisocial personality is a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others. This behavior begin in childhood or early adolescence (age 15 years) and continues into adulthood. The diagnostic criteria, is located on (pages, 659- 662, 1-7): B. The individual at least age 18 years. C. There is evidence of conduct disorder with onset before age 18years. D. The occurrence of antisocial behavior is not exclusively during the course of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The prevalence rate of antisocial personality behavior is 12 months the most severe is male with alcohol and drug use. The developmental and course in antisocial personality disorder has a chronic course but may become less evident or retreat as the individual grows older. Risk and prognosis factor- genetic-psychological- the antisocial disorder is more common among first-degree biological relatives of those with the disorder than the general population. The risk to the biological relatives of female with the disorder tends to be higher than the risk to biological male with the disorder. Culture-related diagnosis issue-appears to be related to low socioeconomic status than urban settings. Gender-related diagnostic issues is that the disorder