The Case Of Mr. Baumer To Blame For The Murder Of Slade

Improved Essays
Mr. Baumer could have killed Slade, but maybe he didn’t. Slade shouldn’t have drunk Mr. Baumer’s alcohol anyway, it’s his fault. Mr. Baumer could’ve done it on purpose because he knew Slade wouldn’t read the label, and would die. As of now Mr. Baumer is on trial for the murder of Slade. Prosecution how do you plead?

Mr. Baumer is in fact guilty, he murdered Slade. He made sure Slade continuously drank his alcohol, then he put poison in its place. He knew Slade wouldn’t be able to read the label so it was perfect. He could even use the excuse that he froze to death, but it was clearly Mr. Baumer. What clearly drove Mr. Baumer to this was revenge, Slade had “roughed him up” once, he didn’t want it to happen again. Defense how do you plead?
…show more content…
Baumer is in fact not guilty for the murder of Slade. It was clearly the cold that drove Slade to his terrible state, not wood alcohol. If Slade even drank the wood alcohol, that was a mistake. Not only because it was Mr. Baumer’s, but because he couldn’t read, and he didn’t know what was in it. This was not driven by Mr. Baumer’s need for revenge, it was driven by Slade need for alcohol. That is why Mr. Baumer is not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lindbergh Baby Case Study

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay will discuss and provide an analysis how the three main components of the criminal justice system: Police, Courts, and Corrections apply to the 1932 Lindbergh Baby Case. In addition, this essay will discuss how first appearance, preliminary hearing, and arraignment apply to the Lindbergh Baby Case. Finally, this essay will discuss adjudication, sentencing, and corrections pertaining to the Lindbergh baby kidnapping. In 1927, Charles Lindbergh and his family had received a lot of attention after he flew nonstop across the Atlantic Ocean from New York City to Paris.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caroline Milam Diminished Capacity James Doorly Psych 3 Montana vs. Egelhoff, Ibn-Tamas vs. US One summer night in 1992, James Allen Egelhoff was camping in the northwestern region of Montana picking mushrooms. While on his camping trip he made friends with two other men, Roberta Pavlova and John Christenson, whom were scavenging for mushrooms and camping as well. Quickly the three became acquainted and after collecting and selling their mushroom findings they spent the rest of their day drinking together. It is reported that they drank at a collective of bars and also at a private party located in Troy, Montana.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Crime On august 4, 1892, Borden house maid Bridget Sullivan heard a cry from Lizzy, the younger of the Borden sisters, alerting her to the fact of Mr. Borden’s death. It became apparent that, while sleeping on the sofa, Mr. Borden had been attacked with a hatchet and killed. Half an hour later, a neighbor, Adelaide Churchill, who had been called over to console Lizzy, discovered the cold body of Abby Borden, also the victim of hatchet wounds, on the second floor of the house. Due to the fact that Andrew Borden’s body had been found still warm, investigators concluded…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: Jim, who lives in Detroit Michigan, had a few drinks at a local bar but was not intoxicated. Before he left he asked the bartender for a drink of water, who in error gave him a 6oz cup of 40% Vodka. Jim drank it quickly noticing the strength of the liquid but figured it was his imagination as he had requested water. The Vodka went straight to his head and he became intoxicated, causing him to lose control of his car which jumped a curb and killed two people. Jim was arrested and put on trial under Michigan’s “causing death while operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated” statute which carries a 15 year prison sentence.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bobbie Bann's Case

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As well, our goal was to show that the neighbourhood was safe and not a threat, proving that Bobbie should not have to jumped to such a conclusion so quickly. Furthermore, he never noticed Fallon was not in the bedroom or even considered that she could have been the person in the toilet. The Crown wanted to show through our questioning of Mr. Bann that if the circumstances were how he said, he would have noticed Fallon was not there. He also never once called the police, which we asked about to show that he did not call the police because he knew that someone was not breaking in and that he was shooting at Fallon. Our last piece of evidence was the three bullet holes in the door and four bullet wounds on Fallon King’s body.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Heale Case Study

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Justice was balanced to the victims, the offender and society within the case R v Siale [2017] NSWSC. Justice was served for the victim as the offender received a lengthy sentence for the crime committed. The offender gained justice as he had a fair trial in the eyes of the court. Justice was also received for society as they maintain the safety of the community, but also the rehibition of the offender to become a better member of society. Justice was served for each party.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In A Lesson Before Dying,an African American man is wrongly convicted of murder. Jefferson's attorney completely dehumanizes Jefferson in order to use reverse psychology on the jury. This was unnecessary because during the 1940’s people of color were never declared innocent even if they were. Basically if you were black no justice would be served. Furthermore, the attorney makes it clear that Jefferson is no where close to being a man and therefore shouldn’t be killed.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the matter of Roper v. Simmons (2005), 17 year old Christopher Simmons and two accomplices had planned a murder in great detail and carried out the killing of victim Shirley Crook. In 1993, Simmons entered Crook’s home, robbed her, tied her up, and finally threw her off a bridge. The case had an overwhelming amount of evidence including a confession from Simmons, testimony from another accomplice in the planning of the murder, and a videotaped reenactment of the murder. At the age of 17, after a brief trial, Simmons was found guilty of the crimes and subsequently sentenced to death (Roper v. Simmons, n.d.). From prison, Simmons filed appeals to both state and federal courts, but with each, his sentence was upheld (Roper v. Simmons, n.d.).…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It 's hard to believe that there was a time in American history where certain human beings had few rights because of their color or gender. These individuals were considered possessions, mistreated and abused in the most horrific ways. No rights, no humanity and pushed to the brink. Cornered into a position where concern for laws and a future no longer seem to matter. All was hopeless, no where to turn and completely powerless to make a choice or consider options.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuading someone to take your side in an argument is not an easy task to accomplish. There are many things a person must learn in order to become an effective persuader. In the movie twelve angry men, persuasion plays a huge role; as the jury has to decide whether the boy (who is accused of murdering his father) is guilty or innocent. This movie is a great example of ad hominem; which is a logical fallacy in which the argument is countered by attacking the person, their motive, or other things relating to the person who is making the argument. In the movie, every juror is convinced that the boy is guilty of the crime; but there is one juror, juror number eight pleads not guilty.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Ben Pollizi Mrs. Kimmich English 10 Advanced 15 April 2017 Sacco and Vanzetti Shortly after World War 1, the United States was soon gripped with a massive fear of communists, foreigners, and anything that wasn’t American. This fear was taken out on anyone who was in America that wasn’t American. One key example of this was the lives of Sacco and Vanzetti. These two men moved to America before World War 1 had begun. Due to the fact that Sacco and Vanzetti were both Italian immigrants, and were convicted of their crime during a time of massive hatred toward foreigners, the justice system disregarded all the reasonable doubt in their case and declared them guilty.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    but it was really Boo. Heck Tate protects Boo Radley and they agree that Ewell did fall on his knife a decision that Scout could fully understand. Boo was a sweet, gentle, and innocent man who was misunderstood by the…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brenton Butler Case Study

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of the years, many have been wrongfully convicted and accused of crimes they did not commit. The mission of the judicial system is to prove your guilt and if they can successfully do so beyond a reasonable doubt, then you will be convicted of that crime. Everyone walks into the court innocent until proven guilty, but unfortunately some proven guilty people are still very much innocent. In one case where this so happened to be true was during the case of Brenton Butler. Brenton Butler was accused of allegedly robbing and murdering an elderly woman at a nearby hotel in his hometown Jacksonville, Florida.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Claudia Espinoza Ms. Walsh English 9 HP 6 December 2015 Guilty or Not Guilty Ladies and gentlemen, my name is Claudia Espinoza, and I am the prosecutor of the case of Jack Merridew and Simon. Thank you for bringing your attention to this matter and listening to what I have to say. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, there is a difference between self-defense and an over-reaction. There is also a difference between what establishes reasonable doubt, and what adds up to just excuses made by the defendant. It has been confessed by many other little boys that Simon was stabbed repeatedly by Jack and the rest of them with sharp spears.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays