The Case Of Moon Microsystems, Inc. V. John Zucchini?

Improved Essays
For my Essay #3, The Juror’s Reflection, I have chosen to discuss the case of Moon Microsystems, Inc. v. John Zucchini. I have chosen this case as I found John Zucchini sounded very innocent during my first read through of the trial description, but on each successive read through I found he sounded more and more guilty. I believe that Zucchini would have had a hard time justifying any benefits of his chosen domain name outside of the gained popularity through Moon’s customer’s confusion. In this case, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff, Moon Microsystems, Inc. To find the defendant, John Zucchini, guilty of Cybersquatting under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. The plaintiff must also prove that the defendant is liable …show more content…
The defendant’s domain name uses a mark that is confusingly similar to Moon Microsystem’s Mocha programming language. The domain name in question contains almost 100% of the trademark owned by Moon Microsystems, Inc. However, I do not think that Zucchini should be financially responsible for damages to the plaintiff as I do not think that the plaintiff suffered any damages because of this cybersquatting. Many customers of both parties may have been confused when locating the respective sites, moonmocha.com and mocha.moon.com, but Zucchini was not directly profiting from this confusion. Any profit gained from this confusion would be difficult to discern from Zucchini’s own success with his online blog as the two interests, programming and late-night coffee drinking, are not mutually exclusive. I’m surprised a plea deal was not discussed between the two parties involving a licensing or sponsorship contract as it seems these two companies may be targeting an overlapping …show more content…
I believe that the defendant would have chosen a domain name closer to his blog’s name if he did not have a bad faith intent. “Mixing Moonlight & Mocha” is a blog name that could have led to many different domain names, for example: moonlightandmocha.com, moonlightmocha.com, moonlight-and-mocha.com, mixmoonlightandmocha.com, or even moonmocha.blog which would have cleared any confusion between Zucchini’s blog and Moon’s programming language. I think that Zucchini had intentions of gaining popularity by using Moon Microsystem’s Mocha trademark because the two words “moon” and “mocha” are the entire trademark while only a small portion of Zucchini’s blog name. I do not think it makes sense for Zucchini to use a domain name that differs so greatly from the name of his coffee shop, LateNightGrinds. Even if his coffee shop was named Moonlight Mocha, I do not think moonmocha.com is a domain name that his customers would stumble upon. His customers and Moon Microsystem’s customers would be very confused when attempting to locate the correct site, and this would not be something a business owner would seek out unless he was hoping to gain popularity off another’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ronald Vaden V

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Issue Presented by the Case The first issue presented in this case refers to the allegation of the breach of contract for insurance coverage provided by Steven Lucas. The second issue presented in the case is whether or not Steven Lucas is responsible for providing false information to potential clients. The third issue presented in this case refers to the accountability of Nunn and Vaden examining the policy and what the insurance program entails. Plaintiff…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stevan Jakovljevic Professor Avdeev Law 2010-05 Fall 2016 Case Brief Term Researched: Duty of Care Case Name: Howard D. Brunson (Plaintiff-Respondent) v. Affinity Federal Credit Union Legal Citation: 954 A.2d 550 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 2008) Date Decided:…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Team Quest Research Paper

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kris West BA 226 William Bloom 01/26/2012 Current Events Presentation: Team Quest Lawsuit A current event that is of significant interest is the lawsuit between Dan Henderson and Matt Lindland over trademark rights to the famous Team Quest Fight Club. This lawsuit is an interesting battle over trademark rights, copyright infringement, and unfair competition. Who owns a name or a trade mark? Who has rights or ownership of its use?…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Application of the law to the facts We the legal team for Greene 's Jewelry will assess all the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed argument in court. The lawsuit provides us with the opportunity to introduce different directions for the arguments needed to be made in the courts; from the case laws, regulations, and substantive law. By Utilizing these resources, in the lawsuit against Ms Lawson it is believed that a favorable decision will be made on behalf of Greene 's Jewelry in both cases. Taking a sufficient amount of time to analyze the details of the case we have come to the conclusion that the focal point and the strength of our argument in the lawsuit against Ms Lawson is that she intentionally violated her contract.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hargroves Persuasive Essay

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Phillipses and Mikowski did not have the Higginses and the Hargroves removed from the Talbot Bank loans and to date, the Phillipses and Mikowski have not paid any funds to the Higginses and the Hargroves as required by the Purchase Agreements. In an effort to avoid their contractual obligations to the Higginses and the Hargroves, the Phillipses claim that the Higginses, the Hargroves, and the Fitzgeralds entered into a civil conspiracy to defame and disparage them, the Riverhouse, and Easton Golf. See Second Amended Counterclaim. The Phillipses contend this was done by spreading rumors throughout Talbot County, and by waging a “defamation campaign” on Facebook.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scholars have predicted that Dental Examiners will lead to a large amount of lawsuits against state boards. These predictions have come true with plaintiffs bringing antitrust suits across the United States. For example, plaintiffs have filed antitrust lawsuits, based upon Dental Examiners, against state boards in Virginia, Tennessee, Missouri, Louisiana, Connecticut, Georgia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AOL Clause

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Case Activities 1 Spotlight on AOL The facts presented in this scenario state that AOL, LLC was a brought a suit filed by 650,000 members for making their personal information public. The members alleged that AOL was in violation of California law. AOL countered by asking for dismissal of the suit based on a “forum-selection” clause that designates the Virginia courts to try member disputes. There are two precedents exposed within this problem first is that The United States Supreme Court has held that a forum selection clause is unenforceable “if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought” and second is California has declared in other cases that the AOL clause contravenes a strong public policy.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Its a well known fact that technology is becoming more embodied in our lives. The Pew Internet and American Life Project released a study stating the number of adults that own cellphones, laptops or tablets is rising. This increase in ownership of technology has revolutionized access to information through the internet. One notable case is O’Grady v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County (2006). Apple filed a case against an unnamed individual who allegedly leaked information on several online sites regarding new Apple products.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: SWATCH AG v. Beehive Wholesale, LLC, 739 F. 3d 150 - Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit 2014 Background of case: Swatch was the appellant and Beehive Wholesale is the respondent. This case was being located in the Court of Appeals of the 4th Circuit located in Richmond, Virginia. The case was argued on October 30,2013 and was decided on January 7, 2014. This case is a civil case that Swatch AG filed to “seek cancelation for trademark infringement and federal unfair competition under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125(a); trademark dilution under the Trademark Dilution Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c); state trademark infringement under Va.Code § 59.1–92.12; and common law unfair competition”. Issue: The issue of this case is that Beehive Wholesale sells a brand of watches called “SWAP” and put in an application to register its mark but Swatch feels as if the application should be reversed because it would be a violation of “federal, state, and common law trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duff Goldman

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the proof of the valid copyright, Goldman should win this case. However, considering the questionable originality and tangibility of cake, the court may decide…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peta V. Cal Analysis

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    v. Faber (C.D. Cal. 1998) — Challenging the previously believed principle that you could never take a company’s logo, the court alllowed the use of Bally’s logo by Ballysucks.com (thereby, protecting criticism sites) in these terms, “An individual who wishes to engage in consumer commentary must have the full range of marks that the trademark owner has to identify the trademark owner as the object of criticism.” PETA v. Doughney (4th Cir. 2001) — In the registering of peta.org to parody PETA, the court ruled that two simultaneous and contradictory messages must exist and that the domain name, website content aside, did not fulfill this definition. Lamparello v. Falwell (4th Cir. 2005) — Contradictory to the PETA case, the web content and domain name were used to find that no commercial use or likelihood of confusion was found in the use of fallwell.com and that trademark infringement was nil.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without these two Acts in place today in our country who knows what our privacy would be like when it comes to gaining access to records. These two Acts almost contradict one another because for The Freedom of Information Act it allows a much easier access to government information in executive branch agency records. This Act also goes beyond that and will give one permission to get access to veteran’s military information of veterans who were deceased on duty. The Privacy Act then makes it harder for an individual to obtain someone’s personal privacy records. This Act protects your privacy which can be great under certain circumstances.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the public relations issue (opportunity or problem) that the case is based upon? The main opportunity available in this case is to extend the tourism of Salem beyond the Halloween month of October to make it a yearly attractive destination to increase sales and revenue. The problem at hand is that Salem is just historically known for the city of witchcraft and they want this perception in people to change. What background(secondary) research was conducted in the case (if any)?…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays