Medical Negligence In Healthcare

Improved Essays
Indian Society in recent times is experiencing a growing awareness regarding patient’s rights and obligations. It can be clearly sensed by the establishment of liability by the law concerning medical professional, claiming damages for the utter suffering caused due to medical negligence, breach of consent, and breach of confidentiality arising out of a doctor patient relationship.
What Is Medical Negligence?

Negligence is simply failure to perform an act with due care and caution. The three ingredients of negligence are as follows:
1. The defendant owed a duty of care towards the plaintiff
2. The defendant has breached his duty of care.
3. The plaintiff suffers an injury on account of his breach.
In cases of medical negligence, it is the doctor who is regarded as the defendant. Medicinal Negligence is itself a hypothesis of liability that inflicts claims of medical malpractice, making this sort of prosecution an elite part of the Tort in addition to Criminal Law and Consumer Protection Act.
Civil Liability and Medical Negligence
Negligence is associated with carelessness in a matter in which law seeks to mandate carefulness. A breach of a duty by a medical practitioner gives a patient the right to initiate action against him under medical negligence.
Persons who offer medical advice and treatment impliedly undertake
…show more content…
The weight of confirmation is correspondingly more noteworthy on the individual who claims carelessness against a specialist. It is known reality that things can turn out badly even mind the best specialist. Also, the blame or the carelessness ought to be built up past every single sensible uncertainty that his expertise fell beneath sensible consideration that he should take amid the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Medical Negligence Theory

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This means that the practitioner has to be liable as in the case of medical negligence towards a victim (patient). This in all brings the relevance of corrective justice theory in this research…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In paragraph 50, Dr. O’Sullivan is noted in his assessment about “concerns about…his [AB] memory, and his [AB] overall compliance with medical instructions.” With consideration of this instance, I contend, that based on AB’s persistence conduct, it is possible AB could have commenced operation of a motor vehicle, regardless of Dr. Andrew’s issue of certificate. Similarily, Dr. Andrews may have a partial defence of contributory negligence. (pg 195) Specifically, the defendant needs to demonstrate that “the plaintiff failed to take the precautions a reasonable person would have for their own protection and; the damage was partly what caused the the plainfiff’s negligent act and was reasonably foreseeable.”  [contrary to instructions from the specialists instructions, AB still inisisted and eventually acted against expert opinion. I would argue a reasonable person would assume that with prior seizures and accidents likely relataed that such ation were not reasonable for personal protection and such conduct was a causable element…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures examines the connections between the complications of medicine and one’s humanity. The author Vincent Lam does this by crafting a telling story that explains the subjective nature of practicing medicine. Firstly, he employs complex medical terminology that readers are unfamiliar with. This creates a feeling of detachment and unfamiliarity. As a result, he magnifies certain situations, highlighting their life-and-death nature.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First what is negligence? Negligence is the breach of legal duty which defendant owes towards the plaintiff. According to Jay M. Feinman of the Rutgers University School of Law; The core idea of negligence is that people should exercise reasonable care when they act by taking account of the potential harm that they might foreseeable cause to other people." Similarly medical negligence is a professional negligence in which health care provider (doctor) breach his duty which he owes towards the patient. A doctor owes certain duty towards the patient who consults him for illness.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Subrata Chattopadhyay ‘’ There are a number of good reasons why doctors biological and morality must take care of corruption, and discuss the problems that corruption creates and perpetuates in the field of health care and medicine, and explore possible remedial measures to address this risk, and take a stand against immoral practices and corruption in the health sector. The first is, to put it simply, corruption kills’’. (Chattopadhyay, vol.10, 2013). This source shows that the medical corruption has effect on patient health it may lead to kill…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malpractice Essay

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. Which of the following about malpractice is CORRECT? A. It is the intentional mistakes done by doctors while treating their patients B. Doctors' legal liability is waived by the patients' informed consent C. Healthcare provider's deviation from the accepted norms of practice D. It is only considered malpractice if it leads to injury, detriment or death E. All of the above 2.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ABSTRACT Medical negligence is a combination of two words. The second word solely describes the meaning, though the meaning of negligence has not been described in a proper way but it is an act recklessly done by a person resulting in foreseeable damages to the other. Negligence is an offense under tort, IPC, Indian Contracts Act, Consumer Protection Act and many more. Medical Negligence basically is the misconduct by a medical practitioner or doctor by not providing enough care resulting in breach of their duties and harming the patients which are their consumers. A professional is deemed to be an expert in that field at least; a patient getting treated under any doctor surely expects to get healed and at least expects the doctor to be careful while performing his duties.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A breach is established where the D has failed in their duty to care for another, therefore, causing the C’s harm. Shakir may be liable for medical malpractice if his breach of a statutory duty to diagnose properly caused BD. To determine whether he has breached his duty as a doctor, the court will ask several questions that must collectively, not singularly, satisfy the court. In medical malpractice cases, a breach occurs when the D fails to take reasonable care that a medical professional in the same position would. The actions and omissions of Shakir will be judged against those of other doctors in the community.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Synopsis of the Rule and Reasoning NM Case In this case, the court reasoned and ruled that, as a matter of law, the doctor owed a duty to the public who might be injured or harmed by the patient's impaired ability to drive that followed the physician's administration of powerful drugs in his office. The court further ruled that Dr. Straight was tasked with following adequate medical procedures. The court argued that Wilschinsky’s cause of action falls within the purpose of the New Mexico Medical Malpractice Act and order the pursuance of the same based on the set…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The main ethical issues present are two principles. One is the patient’s autonomy, and the other is the doctor’s duty to relieve suffering. The patient’s autonomy is defined as the right of the patients to choose their medical path. Advocates for physician assisted suicide argue that under the liberty provision in the United States Constitution’s due process clause, a terminally ill patient should have the right to choose death (Howard Ball). Those opposed to physician assisted suicide argue that there are limits to autonomy.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays