Guth V. Loft Inc. Case Study

Improved Essays
10. What are the facts and outcome in the case of Guth v. Loft, Inc. and how does it apply to the duty of loyalty and good faith?
Charles Guth became the president of Loft, Inc., a Candyland restaurant chain. Guth also partly owned Grace Company, which created formulas of syrups used for soft drinks (Spamann, 2014). Loft, Inc. at the time, purchase its syrup from Coca-Cola company, however, Guth was dissatisfied with the price and decided to create a new formula with Roy Megargel (Clarkson, 2015, p. 785). This new formula was meant to create the trademark for Pepsi-Cola. While working for Loft, Inc., Guth used Loft’s credits, capital, employees and facilities to fund his new venture without Loft’s knowledge. Once Loft found out what Guth was
…show more content…
Bylaws include corporate procedures and illustrate the powers of shareholders, officers and board of directors (Moran, 1994, p.443). Since bylaws do not have to be filed by the Secretary of State, they can be easily amended and enforced as soon as approval if passed by the board of directors (Sullivan, 2016). The first step to amending bylaws would be to conduct a meeting to inform the board of directors of the purpose, specific changes and procedures concerning the amending process (Sullivan, 2016). Next, the company’s existing bylaws need to be reviewed and voting percentages must be determined. In most cases, all board of directors have the right to vote, however, voting rights vary from company to company. Some agreements require a two-thirds majority while others may only require a minimal number of votes (Sullivan, 2016). Once the amendments are drafted, a copy of the changes, including the date of the vote must be distributed and all voting parties must properly review the documents. A second meeting will then be held to collect everyone’s vote. If the vote passes, a written resolution must be prepared reflecting the changes and minutes of the meeting (Sullivan, 2016). A copy of this document must be filed within the companies’ incorporation files and the changes should be officially written in the bylaws once the meeting …show more content…
If there is a will a personal representative, executor or trustee will be assigned to manage and administer the deceased shareholders estate (Streissguth, 2012). The personal representatives’ rights will be specified in the terms of the will. A will may also place certain restrictions on the transfer of shares that occur after the shareholders death. If a shareholder does not have a valid will, state laws will govern who will inherit the shares. The transfer procedure will begin in probate court once a personal representative is assigned authority to take over the distribution of assets (Streissguth, 2012). The representative will then use his/her authority to notify the brokerage that holds the certificate of stocks and the brokerage will provide the representative with the certificates and transfer of ownership forms (Streissguth, 2012). The representative will then bring the forms to the bank. The Securities and Exchange Commission requires that an executor provides a Medallion Signature Guarantee before transferring the ownership of the shares. Once the Medallion Guarantee is processed, the representative returns the documents to the bank and a transfer agent re-issues certificated under the name of the shareholders beneficiaries (Streissguth,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    1. Goods versus Services. A. ISSUE: Discuss fully whether the contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of goods or the sale of serv¬ices. The contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of services because the Palermos orally agreed to the purchase and installation of the carpet.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The general rule says, company has approved or endorsed an act or contract that has been done or made except prior authorization. (PRBL Week 5 2015) As Karen and Jones were two legal directors so they were legal authority by law to take decisions. They thought it would be a good expansion opportunity for Delish and took the loan.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Case of Eileen Foster v. BofA and Countrywide The story starts March 7, 2007. Eileen Foster was promoted to Executive Vice President, Fraud Risk Management while she was working for the Countrywide Financial Corp. This role requires our whistleblower to supervise and monitor internal bank processes and mortgage fraud investigations, if needed, organize and send conclusion in the form of suspicious activity report to the U.S. Treasury as well as the board of directors. During her time, she learned that Full Spectrum Lending Division (FSL) managers in the Boston area were subject to several fraud allegations, she directed an investigation into the matter, found conclusive evidence of “egregious fraud”, including document and invoice forgery,…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case Robertson verses Hunter Panels LLC and Carlisle Construction Materials Inc., was a civil rights – Title VII Employment – Retaliation, workplace Harassment, Gender Discrimination suit. Sandra Robertson had worked for Hunter Panels LLC since 2006. Robertson filed a lawsuit against Hunter Panels LLC and Carlisle Construction Materials Inc. in April 2013, for harassment on the job, and gender discrimination. Mrs. Robertson was fired in 2012, after telling a human resource employee that gender discrimination was a on going problem at Hunter Panels LLC (Packel, 2016). Mrs. Robertson a twenty-year veteran of the Untied States Air Force, the discrimination started after she was hired at Hunter Panels LLC.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Baker V. Carr Case Study

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Q1 The main inquiry in Baker v. Carr was in the case of redistricting was a legitimate issue the courts could deliver proactively to revise manhandle or a political issue. The state contended that it was a political issue, so the courts had no purview. The case demonstrated a standout amongst the most debilitating in the Supreme Court's history, with the choice held over for re-contention on the grounds that the court couldn't achieve a lion's share choice. Equity Charles Evans Whittaker was so resentful about the case, he at long last recused himself from the choice, and the worry over the choice may have added to his initial retirement from the Court.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss the case of R v. Labaye. A summary of the nature of the proceeding and the judges writing decision, facts, legal issues, the decision, judicial reasoning and a thorough analysis will be addressed in this essay. I prefer the reasoning of the majority decision as it is reasonable and ethical. The nature of the proceeding is an appeal heard from the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One amendment can also nullify another amendment: for example, amendment 21 repealed amendment 18 (prohibition of alcohol). In order for a new amendment to be proposed, two-thirds of both the Senate and House of Representatives must agree on it. It can also be agreed on by a Constitutional Convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures, but no amendment had been passed this way yet. It is then sent to the national archivist, who sends it to the Governors of each state to ratify. Finally, it is sent to the Office of the Federal Register.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A proposed amendment must be passed by a two-thirds from both the senate and the house of representatives. Then ratified by the legislatures of…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Honig vs. Doe (1988) In 1988, the concept of disciplining students with disabilities under the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA), which is today considered the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA), was brought into question. The plaintiff, an emotionally disturbed (ED) child named John Doe, was suspended from school for choking another student. He claimed that his ED caused his misbehavior. As the school was deciding to expel him, they maintained his suspension.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Law 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Answer: Yes, Bo would be entitled to recover his $1,000 payment plus the $150 cost of clearing the land. He has the option to rescind his contract. Also, Sadia had knowledge and consent that Bo was going to had Lot No. 2 cleared of brush. Therefore, he should be able to get the money back for the cost of clearing the land. (g) Assume that on March 1.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Amendment did you choose for your topic? Include the number and the text. The 2nd Amendment, The Right to Bear Arms MLA citation for the Bill of Rights (official government site): "The Bill of Rights: A Transcription." National Archives and Records Administration.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fiduciary Duty Essay

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this case, the directors of a company arrived at the share price for a leveraged buy-out merger without consulting the Company’s and independent financial experts. The directors also failed to determine the company’s total value before the merger. The directors of the company were found to have been grossly negligent in the manner in which they handled the merger. Even though the share price arrived by the directors proved to be profitable for the company, the court maintained that the directors had failed to exercise their duty of care because they had failed to consult any financial experts when arriving at their decision (Macey,…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Conrail Case Study

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ACQUISITION OF CONRAIL(B) ASSIGNMENT Mergers, Acquisitions and Corporate Restructuring Submitted To Professor Vishwanath SR Submitted By Amit Prasad Swathi Nivarthi 1. Why did Norfolk Southern make a hostile bid for Conrail? Ans: The most prominent reason for Norfolk to make a hostile bid was to continue its existence.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics