The most obvious reason that the government is guilty is that the events that lead to this unfortunate situation for Dennett was completely their idea. They sought out Dennett to undertake …show more content…
The government did not force him to agree to become involved with the mission. Dennett could have simply turned the offer down, and then none of these unfortunate events would have happened. The government’s initial intentions (difficult to accurately gauge) did not appear to involve any harm done to Dennett, which by Kantian ethics shows that the government was not doing any wrong up to this point. Furthermore, what happened in Oklahoma could also be considered a tragic accident, and Dennett was aware of the possibility that something could go terribly wrong during the mission. It could be argued that Dennett knew what he signed up for and therefore, and was well aware of the risks, so the government cannot be held liable for any negative consequences. While this argument may have some truth to it, it is not completely sound. When a company, organization, or government is a part of or responsible for a tragedy, it is their moral responsibility to do everything they possibly can to support and offer help to those negatively affected by the tragic event. The government’s solution was to give Dennett a new body, but they also attached Hubert to this body, which means that they really never properly fixed the initial problem, they instead created a new