Defining the Problem This case presents two ethical dilemmas. First, respecting human agency in participating in nonviolent …show more content…
It is supported by Aristotelian, Kantian, and Bonhoefferian ethics. Utilitarianism provides less support, but it can be argued that the avoidance of the pain of a further incident of abuse outweighs any potential for public humiliation for Beth’s family. Most importantly, this is the most selfless course of action, which supports its alignment with the will of God. It is important to note that Beth’s brother, the aggressor, provides the argument for incest as opposed to abuse. His interests are clearly self-centered, as doing so would provide the most benefit for him. Further it is not Beth but her mother who suggests keeping the situation private. Beth’s mother is also acting in her own self-interest to preserve the family’s image in their small town. She assumes that Beth desires the same, but the only information we have from Beth is that she was raped by her older brother. Considering the lifelong consequences of such a violation, the hospital must prioritize Beth’s future safety and sense of being protected. Involving the Department of Family and Children’s Services is the best way to do