Reparation Or Unity
In “The Case for Reparations” Ta-Nehisi Coates say that we should accept the inhumanity of white supremacist . However African American believes that they will be paid reparation because they have been treated cruelly and have been wronged. Moreover reparation can't not pay off all the crimes that has been done, only some crimes can be paid off by reparation. Yet getting reparation may be satisfying, but it will divide all Americans. Moreover Americans has been divided for centuries, and if Americans cry about what has been done to their dads or themself then we will never unity as one Americans. African American should not make the children of the cruel White Americans suffer, just because their dads acted inhumanly …show more content…
He say that “ north lawndale was an extreme portrait of the trend that ail black chicago” , and no white families lived there. He say that when the African American wanted to move to a better place, even though there would be houses for sale the white retailer wouldn't sale it to them. He claims that there were no laws that protected the African American peoples rights. He also says that blacks family's household is worth 20 time less than whites families household. He claims that black upper- middle-class families did not get to live in a better place than the poor black families, they were all basically trap in one big horrible places with little freedom. He shows that African American kids were more likely to join a gang group, insteads of going of to college or even highschool. He points that the government could have pass laws that could have protected the rights of African Americans, but some of the white congress mens tried and failed because the white supremacist, and retailing business didn't let …show more content…
He claims that “the idea of reparation threatens something much deeper--America’s heritage, history”. He illustrates that we could get to the point where everyone is equal if we work together but it will take sometime. He says that if American people chase the idea of reparation rather then find a solution to their problems than american people will divide up. He claims that the only way the American people could come together a unit as one is if Americans “settling with old ghosts” and “Banishment of white guilt”. Nevertheless he claims that the way of reparation isn't the best way that Americans should come together because “reparation would mean a revolution of the American consciousness”, and it would not look good for the American people. He points that if we chase the idea of reparation than we will never achives the goal of unity, equality, and justice for all Americans no matter what race or
In “The Case for Reparations” Ta-Nehisi Coates say that we should accept the inhumanity of white supremacist . However African American believes that they will be paid reparation because they have been treated cruelly and have been wronged. Moreover reparation can't not pay off all the crimes that has been done, only some crimes can be paid off by reparation. Yet getting reparation may be satisfying, but it will divide all Americans. Moreover Americans has been divided for centuries, and if Americans cry about what has been done to their dads or themself then we will never unity as one Americans. African American should not make the children of the cruel White Americans suffer, just because their dads acted inhumanly …show more content…
He say that “ north lawndale was an extreme portrait of the trend that ail black chicago” , and no white families lived there. He say that when the African American wanted to move to a better place, even though there would be houses for sale the white retailer wouldn't sale it to them. He claims that there were no laws that protected the African American peoples rights. He also says that blacks family's household is worth 20 time less than whites families household. He claims that black upper- middle-class families did not get to live in a better place than the poor black families, they were all basically trap in one big horrible places with little freedom. He shows that African American kids were more likely to join a gang group, insteads of going of to college or even highschool. He points that the government could have pass laws that could have protected the rights of African Americans, but some of the white congress mens tried and failed because the white supremacist, and retailing business didn't let …show more content…
He claims that “the idea of reparation threatens something much deeper--America’s heritage, history”. He illustrates that we could get to the point where everyone is equal if we work together but it will take sometime. He says that if American people chase the idea of reparation rather then find a solution to their problems than american people will divide up. He claims that the only way the American people could come together a unit as one is if Americans “settling with old ghosts” and “Banishment of white guilt”. Nevertheless he claims that the way of reparation isn't the best way that Americans should come together because “reparation would mean a revolution of the American consciousness”, and it would not look good for the American people. He points that if we chase the idea of reparation than we will never achives the goal of unity, equality, and justice for all Americans no matter what race or