Tom Regan Animal Rights Analysis

Great Essays
In “The Case for Animal Rights,” Tom Regan writes about his beliefs regarding animal rights and states certain goals for the animal rights movement. He believes animals have inherent value and are equal to humans and all living beings. Regan has an abolitionist position clearly shown in his distaste for the way animals are treated and goes on to tell us about the fundamentally wrong system of using animals as a resource. Regan argues this position and gives solid reasoning to support his claims on why there needs to be a change. Treating animals as though they are our property and using them only to benefit us is morally justifiable but only to some degree. In the article Regan rejects three different ideas or views about the rights of Animals. …show more content…
“utilitarian accepts is that of utility: do the act that will bring about the best balance between satisfaction and frustration for everyone affected by the outcome.” (1. Steven M. Cahn and Peter Markie, eds., Ethics: History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 825, http://www.questia.com/read/88356604/ethics-history-theory-and-contemporary-issues.) Although agreeing with some of Philosopher Tom Regan, I myself feel that although limits should be made some of the testing is necessary. How else does one learn about another species? “Every advance in medicine--every new drug, new operation, new therapy of any kind--must sooner or later be tried on a living being for the first time. That trial, controlled or uncontrolled, will be an experiment. The subject of that experiment, if it is not an animal, will be a human being.’ ( Steven M. Cahn and Peter Markie, eds., Ethics: History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 835, http://www.questia.com/read/88356614/ethics-history-theory-and-contemporary-issues.) If my dog was to get cancer and I could send him to a treatment center like a could my girlfriend I would. By allowing the necessary studies on animals it allows us to be prepared for the future times we will see an animal with the same illnesses. Or animals who also have specials needs it teaches us how to better …show more content…
There are a few valid counter arguments we must consider and then fight. First is the utilitarian view on the subject, many people have problems with this theory. For the utilitarian, the only important matter is the overall gain of happiness and it denies that individuals have value. Its human oriented for overall gain and it still allows for animals to suffer to some degree. If there is more happiness created, then harm its acceptable. I do not see an issue with this way of reasoning because there is compromise, and I believe that’s the right way to do things. I don’t see completely stopping all animal use beneficial, but I do not believe in abuse and cruel treatment, so moderation and regulations are what I think are important here. Others would say any type of farming or agricultural is wrong, as well as science and medical testing. No matter what it would be an unnecessary act against an innocent and equally free being. It is fact that we have done huge amounts of animal testing in the past and we currently have many advancements because of it. I was not alive back then to choose how things where done but looking back I do not regret it or see it evolving any other way. That’s not to say that I think all of it was right, but I believe the test for advances was and is necessary. If done with respect the act is permissible to me, with consideration of the outcome of course. Another argument is how can one be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Then, he compares them with the theory, which says that we have direct duties to the animals. Regan rejects contractarianism. (Regal T., 1985, p.35) He believes that the rules of this theory cannot be considered fair. The author cites the example of children and individuals with mental retardation, explaining that they, as well as animals, are not able to sign an agreement, which means that such a theory is unjust and cannot be used in the case of non-human animals.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals all around the world are used for testing and research. People always wonder why people use animals. They ask why would scientist put these innocent creatures through something horrible. It has been proven that scientist use about 100 million animals for testing and research each year. From personal research, I have seen many inhumane things happen to these creatures that should not happen.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Almost every day an animal is beaten, abandoned and even starved. Animals should have rights to protect themselves from being hurt, just like us people. If people followed the animals rights, fewer animals would be in danger. I ask that people begin to help make a change and make animal rights to prevent any more harm to these helpless little animals who don’t deserve to be hurt. There are some crazy people out in the world that say animals can’t feel pain.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    8607756 Animal Testing Is Extremely Wrong Imagine living inside a locked closet without any control over any aspect of your life. Over the years, billions of animals are used for experiments and getting harmed in labs. Animal testing is any scientific experiment or test in which a life of an animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm. Animals benefit us humans in many ways such as providing milk, for fun and entertainment, recreation, for work, transport, cultivation and many more, these are reasons why humans need animals.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It posits that because predation deprives an animal of its life, it is an unethical partnership and if humans and animals were to be considered truly morally equal, humans would be obligated to interfere with these unethical natural relationships and prevent this suffering. Humans would for example have the obligation to protect gazelles from lions in the same fashion as humans would protect small children from lions, as Regan allows no distinction between humans and animals. Because there is no current system of policing the natural world, so the argument goes, humans are failing their ethical duty. This implies that there must not be an assignment of rights to animals and that Regan’s stance is…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Heedlessness of Animal Rights Animal rights are the rights believed to belong to animals, so they can live experiment-free. The basic principle of animal rights according to PETA states that “animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on or use for entertainment” (BROOK). It is no secret that animal rights is one of the paramount controversial topics of the 21st century. There are still debates today between animal rights activists and animal rights terrorists. However animal rights activists seem to captivate different audiences through the media.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most people there are two scenarios that come to mind when they hear animal testing. The first scenario is that scientist are torturing, neglecting and abusing the animals that are being tested on. The other scenario is that scientist are being ethical, take care of the animals and are creating life-saving medicines. This makes the use of animals in experiments a controversial topic; a topic that isn’t quite black and white when argued. There are different types of animal testing like, medical testing and cosmetic testing; one is more ethical than the other.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every second grader has gone to the zoo to see lions and tigers in their cages and learned about what they eat and a few interesting facts about the animals. What the second graders do not think about is how the animals got to the zoo and what a day in the life of a zoo animal really consists of. No American could ever imagine living in solitary confinement in any situation other than being punished for a crime in jail, so what makes that different for animals? They did not commit crimes, they did not do anything to deserve to be sent away to public zoos and aquariums to be punished. Animals are voiceless, they have no way to defend themselves and stand up for their rights.…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tom Regan, advocates the animal right and he claims abolition of the use of animal in science, commercial animal agriculture, sport hunting, trapping, and all other ways that we treat animals. He argues that people must change their beliefs about the animal rights that is fundamentally wrong. The society need a serious movement for correcting the whole system of treating animals. He stresses that people should stop all cruelties to the animals.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Animal Essay For centuries man has always had the upper hand over animals but animal activists are now trying to sway the argument to prove that animals should be treated at the same standard as humans. Activists are working hard to show that all animals, from the smallest fish to the largest elephant, can feel pain, emotions, and human connections. After reading the articles I have concluded that an animal bill of rights should be added the the United States Government. I believe that this Bill of rights should provide standards and regulations to how animals are kept and cared for, It should also cover laws of what humans should and should not be allowed to to to animals, for example, slaughterhouses versus bull fighting, and finally the bill of rights should not state nor infer that animals should not be treated with the same standard or be “legally declared a person”(Yong 38).…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tom Regan Animal Rights

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First, one might place the idea of moral values on Regan to argue against his case of inherent value that protects…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals are inhumanely treated all over the world and have been mistreated for thousands of years. They have been hunted, abused, and people believe that they are not smart and don’t have emotions. The Animal Bill of Rights is good start for animal rights, however, It will interfere with the way people live their lives too much. People will not be willing to pay more for animal products, give up hunting, cultural rituals having to do with animals, and much more because of The Animal Bill of Rights. Animals have feelings, they feel pain, are aware of themselves, and their surroundings.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of animals in research is widely accepted, particularly within the scientific community. However, with the rise of new technologies and growing concern over animal welfare, the ethics of animal experimentation and the extent to which it is practiced has increasingly come into question. Although animal experimentation is regulated to prevent excessive suffering, opponents argue that these measures are insufficient. Proponents of animal research argue that knowledge gained from it and the various applications for it justify the unethical manner by which that knowledge is obtained. This argument neglects critical moral considerations rooted in deontology and utilitarianism which condemn the unethical use of animals for the advancement…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals are not ours to eat. Animals are not ours to wear. Animals are not ours to experiment on. Animals are not ours to use for entertainment. Animals are not ours to abuse in any way.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Animal Testing Wrong? In the current discussions of animal testing, an important argument has been whether or not animal testing is wrong, considering that animals have feelings. One viewpoint is that using animals for testing is completely okay and important in human survival. From this idea, many people such as Heloisa Sabin believe that “without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year” (158).…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays