The Case Against Banning The Word Retard Essay

Improved Essays
Words can be hurtful, some leave a little sting and others can feel like huge daggers. One of those dagger words to many is the word retarded other wise known as the “R” word. “It’s not that I’ve come to praise the word “retard” I just don’t think we should bury it” argues Professor Christopher Fairman from Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, in his article “The Case Against Banning the word ‘retard’”. While the word retarded is not the problem, Fairman’s argument ends up ridiculous and we should absolutely ban the word because the real problem lies in the meaning behind the word, the ability to invoke strong emotions, and the negativity following its use. Of all things Fairman argues, he chooses to battle against the Special …show more content…
Yet, he fails. One paragraph he tells us the history of mental illness, then just two paragraphs later he completely contradicts himself. Fairman wrote, “for centuries, mental illness and disabilities. . . were thought to be the work of devils and demons. . . shame was often attached to individuals and their families.” Just two paragraphs following Fairman writes, “The N-word invokes some of the foulest chapters in our nations history: “retard” however harsh, pales in comparison.” Downright negating himself both words portray extremely foul chapters in America’s history. He leaves us to wonder about his ethics and creditability on the subject matter. Take a look at the world history of the word “R” word and just see if it does not “Invoke” some enormously foul …show more content…
Fairman maintains, “Invariably, negative connotations materialize around what ever new word is used.” He debates how the “r” word was originally used to take place of the insulting word idiot, yet still the word retarded has been turned into a negative insulting word. Then the phrase “intellectual disability” became the new official diagnosis. In 2010 the family of Rosa Marcellino a little girl with Downs Syndrome helped to pass “Rosas Law… mandated that “intellectual disability” replace “mental retardation” in many areas of federal government” (Hallahan 86). When Fairman remarks, “Idiot becomes an insult and gives way to retardation, which in turn suffers the same fate, leading to intellectual disability” he plummets back down the slope. He implies here, that the new diagnosing term of intellectually disabled will soon in turn be used as an insulting expression and become demeaning as well. Seriously? Is he delusional? Who on earth is going to be like, “hey dude you look intellectually disabled in that hat”, or “man that commercial was so intellectually disabled.”? How ridiculous, not only is it a long phrase, but is extremely specific while almost self explanatory. Take a look at the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities legal definition of “Intellectual disability is a disability characterized by significant limitations in both

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    (Legal -dictionary.thefreedictionary.com, 2012) False advertising is absolutely unethical and must be punished by law. It has numerous negative effects to make sure that companies would stop doing this act.…

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    An issue that has plagued society for centuries is the creation of “the other half” - a group of people that are considered below or of a lesser value than the rest of the population. “Othering,” refers to any action by which an individual or group is mentally classified in as not being “one of them” or “one of us.” While many factors contribute to why “othering” is still prevalent today, its consequences are extremely detrimental to society. The tone and words used to refer to individuals based on their ethnicity or color of their skin can have severe effects on its victims. Simple classifications like “those people” immediately degrades a group, putting them in a closed box of inferiority. In contrast to being mindful that every person…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Montresor says “My heart grew sick; it was the dampness of the catacombs that made it so” (870). This shows that Montresor is feeling a little bit of guilt about the plan he is doing. Man vs Man is another conflict that played a huge part in this story. Montresor wants revenge on Fortunato. Montresor says, “When he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge” (866).…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through the use of “name-calling”, he draw attention away from his opponents and back to him. This childish act of calling often draws out the worst in people and always causes terrible reproductions. Not only does it belittle the receiver of the insult but it also cause people to question the quality of the person. Professor of English, Donna Woodfolk Cross states, that the purpose of name-calling is to get us to react blindly and to not question whether or not the statement is true (210). Trump’s use of name-calling is like a double-edged sword, not only does it give the recipient a bad name but it also causes people to question their character.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two cultures in different locations will not have the same perspective on topics, it’s a known idea created from deductive reasoning. “Time to Assert American Values” also presents their claim by using some fallacies. The idea that “this country was also founded by dissidents” who “believed it was wrong to punish pilferage with hanging or crimes of any sort with torture” is a hasty generalization (“Time to Assert American Values” 180). A statement like this is faulty reasoning because it doesn’t explore the fact we used to punish crimes the same way. Another example of the same concept is when explaining how Americans who are “express[ing] outrage over a punishment that causes permanent scarring” are being “culturally arrogant”(“Time to Assert American Values” 180).…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In short, the actions intended to provide a positive effect end up fueling a negative character change. Hawthorne continues to censure hypocrisy as shown by Dimmesdale’s reaction towards the cruelty and malice Chillingworth delivers. “While thus suffering under bodily disease, and gnawed and tortured by some black trouble of the soul… Dimmesdale had achieved great popularity in his sacred office” (Hawthorne 131). The character of Dimmesdale is a living hypocrisy. Considered a holy man by the majority of the town, Dimmesdale is rather in fact a sinner.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jesus Christ, you’re a crazy bastard.” People challenge this book due to the fact that they think the language in the text should not be included. Without this issue of language included in this text, the book would have a different meaning. This use of language shows who the characters are. Another issue that shows characterization is mental disabilities. A lot of people see Lennie’s disabilities as a mockery but it shows George and his friendship.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A huge portion of English pros could be potentially be considered as bad pros because we as humans do not recognize these problems, Dying Metaphors, False Limbs, Pretentious Diction, and Meaningless Words all are substantial in the creation of unprincipled English writing. Thus, the usage of these no matter who the writer is, a columnist for the New York Times, a civil rights activist, a scientist, or even the President of the United States, can fall victim to grips that can constrain the writing, and be classified as Orwell’s examples of bad…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment is Dead Wrong Capital punishment, such as the death penalty, is an intolerable denial of civil liberties and is inconsistent with the fundamental values of our democratic system; the death penalty is uncivilized in theory and unfair and inequitable in practice. There should not be a death penalty in action. It isn’t as effective as other options out there, and is morally wrong. The death penalty isn’t the best form of prevention, closure and isn’t the economical smart choice. In addition to that, it stirs an immense deal of controversy.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What Went Wrong Analysis

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What Went Wrong Sienna Fick History The Freedoms of America need to be revised. Freedom of speech and the infringing of the right to bare arms are harmful in two drastically different areas harmful physical and harmful mental. There are apparent and growing flaws in the bill of rights that need attention. The two most detrimental are freedom of speech and gun rights. The government is trying to cover up the holes in these articles…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays