The case of whether guns should be banned is very controversial. Some people believe that guns need to be better controlled, while others say that they should be banned. In the article “The Case Against Banning Guns” there are many strong arguments against banning guns. I think that the most important point in the article is that even if there very fewer amounts of guns, or if they were less accessible, people who really want to do harm would still find a way to get a gun. In the text, it state’s, “Psychotics and terrorists will always find ways to exploit the cracks.” I am wondering if there were fewer guns accessible would there be more bombings and other methods of mass killing used more often? When I read this article, it made me
