• Home Page
  • Aristotle's Five Characteristics Of Personality According To Fieser

Aristotle's Five Characteristics Of Personality According To Fieser

Decent Essays
Show More
Virtue is good attributes that controls our feelings such as anger, joy, sorrow, love and impulse. Vice are hostile features we incur as a result of our emotions and Virtue Theory on the other hand is when we have good traits and we do not have any hostile personality. According to Fieser, there are four cardinal virtues in Plato’s theory: wisdom, courage, temperance, and justice. (Fieser 35). In Aristotle’s theory, the psyche consist of three faculties: cumulative, appetitive and vegetative. The appetitive faculty is both rational and irrational because it is accountable for our state of consciousness in human and lower animals undergo strong feelings. (Fieser 36). Aristotle went as far as to make three general observations about the nature …show more content…
In the development of practical wisdom, Aristotle mentioned that there are two contributions which are: an insightful information of our faith in life and the second contribution is pondering about and arranging the best ways in which we can achieve that purpose. When it comes to our appropriate response to anger; according to Fieser, Aristotle said that there are five factors; in his discussion about good temper. These factors are: We have the right to become enraged only at the person befitting, and for the correct offense, to the right length with the right quickness and for an appropriate length of time. (Fieser 39). Faith, hope and charity are three theological virtues found in Virtue Theory, by Fieser. An example of a misapplied virtue is when we believe that it is a principle to not easily be excited or worried but when a person who does bad things is able to think and do stuff in a calm way, this makes him seem more sinful than he would have been. To resolve the problem of misapplied virtues Kant suggest that we should grow our values in response to the general ethical rules that we follow. (Fieser …show more content…
Kant, on the other hand agree with Mills argument and also said that we often base our opinion on others action rather than their predisposition. (Fieser 44). The key differences between action/ rule-based morality and Virtue-based morality is according to virtue-base theories greater value is deposited on building good qualities than on acting in agreement with moral rules, the things that we do that are considered proper, are those things that pour from our true personality and ethics is being a good person, which is considered when we have ethical characteristics. On the other hand, action/rule-based theories is when force placed on good actions, which correspond to ethical rules, although the nice personality that we possess might help us to act proper, they do not show proper actions and the last difference is that we judge people according to what they do and not on them being a good person. (Fieser 45). Anscombe’s criticism of action/ rule-based morality is that it stays away from not being regular in terms of moving forward in ethical rules without any notion of a rule

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Determining Morality In Kant's Categorical Imperative
    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Determining Morality In Kant's Categorical Imperative

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Similarities Between Kant And Aristotle
    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Similarities Between Kant And Aristotle

    The following points of similarities are constructed upon their scientific and philosophical theories. For instance, Aristotle’s virtue of justice has a close similarity to Kant’s perfect duties to self and others and Aristotle’s virtues that he lists has a rough correspondence in line with Kant’s imperfect duties to self and others. Therefore, the recommended way of living life of Aristotle and Kant, is fairly similar. Furthermore, Aristotle and Kant argued the point that emotions are subjective and cannot be useful in making moral claims, which lead them both to conclude that reason and logic are the way to understand the moral world. In most cases, Aristotle and Kant viewed the morality of an individual is determined by the action and not the consequences of the action.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle And John Stuart Mill And The Nicomachean Ethics
    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle And John Stuart Mill And The Nicomachean Ethics

    Aristotle (384BC-322BC) was a Greek philosopher who is considered to be one of the greatest thinkers in the history of western philosophy and science. One of his most influential works is the Nicomachean Ethics, where he puts forward a theory of happiness that is still pertinent today. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) was a British philosopher who has had a considerable influence on contemporary moral and political philosophy. Both Aristotle and John Stuart Mill develop their ethical theories around the search for the highest good. They both agree on happiness being the highest good.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nicomachean Ethics And Aristotle's Definition Of Happiness According To Aristotle
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nicomachean Ethics And Aristotle's Definition Of Happiness According To Aristotle

    31). According to the philosopher, virtue is a ‘characteristic’ rather than as opposed to a ‘passion’ or ‘capacity’. This characteristic is determined by an individual’s choice. These choices must be determined in mean of wisdom and rationale, which is the implication in which it is labeled a virtue. In justification, an individual is permitted to act in accordance to a particular virtue that is most appropriate for the circumstances.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast Virtue Ethics And Virtue Ethicism
    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    Compare And Contrast Virtue Ethics And Virtue Ethicism

    While deontologists focus primarily on duty and obligation, virtue ethicists focus more on how one’s character affects their behavior. Aristotle believed that a virtuous person would fare better in life that a person who has lived a life of vice (Rachels,…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Kantian Deontology
    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Essay On Kantian Deontology

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Virtue Ethics
    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Virtue Ethics

    Back in ancient Greece Aristotle theory of Virtue Ethics begged the question “what sort of person should I be?” (SL, 254) It’s no surprise this question still persists over two thousand years after his death. To this day Aristotelian virtue ethics remains prominent in ethical theories, all this time there have been objections to its theories but there must be something to these ancient ideas. Over the course of this paper I will explain virtue ethics as a whole and present an argument against virtue ethics and why virtue ethics has been able to withstand the opposing ideas.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Summary Of The Elements Of Moral Philosophy By James And Stuart Rachels
    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of The Elements Of Moral Philosophy By James And Stuart Rachels

    Philosophy 2306 Final Paper In The Elements of Moral Philosophy, James and Stuart Rachels discuss the ideas of ethics that a novice should challenge. This book consists of thirteen chapters. First, the author begins with the minimum conception of morality; the following three chapters cover cultural relativism and the connection between morality and religion; the middle chapters, five to twelve, focus on essential ethical theories; and the last chapter describes the author’s perspective of what a satisfactory moral theory should be like.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Louden's Virtue Ethical Theory
    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Louden's Virtue Ethical Theory

    Understanding virtue ethics theories begins with understanding the concept of the ideal character traits a virtuous and ethical person has according to Aristotle’s Ethical Theory. I will argue that virtue ethics relies on the actions of a person in adhering to their duty as a part of society’s moral expectations. Louden argues that a contemporary analysis is necessary while holding a more pragmatic application about Aristotle’s view of practical wisdom as the standard of a person’s virtue ethics. I contend that this fails because it only focused on the realities of the contemporary world versus the polis community of the Aristotle’s era when he formed his theory. After first explaining Loudens argument for moral evaluation that it only takes…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pursuit Of Virtue In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pursuit Of Virtue In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    Happiness is sometimes equated with pleasure, although this may be sufficient for animals, for human life one must strive for a divine sense of true happiness that is not the direct result of a single action. Aristotle makes the argument that pleasure is something that even animals can experience, this proving that there is no distinction between human life. For this reason, Aristotle believes that someone who simply strives for pleasure as the highest good is slavish and like a fatted cattle. As pleasures themselves change throughout one’s actions, it is important that one dedicates themselves to excelling and being virtuous, as being virtuous in itself becomes pleasurable. Although pleasure is still an important factor in excelling and living well, it is not the primary goal nor the highest good one can achieve.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle's Doctrine Of The Mean Analysis
    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle's Doctrine Of The Mean Analysis

    Other virtues may be any of the following: Determination, Modesty, Bravery, Excellence, and Trust. A vice is the deficiency or the excess surrounding the virtue and its situation. For example, if the virtue is courage, then the vices would either be recklessness (excess), or being a coward…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals By Kant And John Stuart Mill
    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals By Kant And John Stuart Mill

    In accordance with Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, I will argue that ethical actions should be judged by good will alone. By comparing the theories of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill, I will conclude that Kant’s theories are more realistic in regards to the nature of humans. Immanuel Kant argues that one’s good intentions should be the deciding factor in judging their actions no matter the outcome. What is beneficial about this is that it allows for the expression of the intrinsic values of a person. Since every person has different virtues and opinions, they can act in any way they choose.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Can Virtue Be Taught Essay
    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Can Virtue Be Taught Essay

    In my paper, I will argue that virtue can be taught to those who are willing to change. Although those who oppose the teaching of virtue believe that virtue is a born trait and is developed naturally through habits. There are many who believe that virtue is teachable and although there may be bad people, it is true that they…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Similarities And Differences Between Kant And Aristotle
    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Similarities And Differences Between Kant And Aristotle

    Unlike Kant, Aristotle believed that virtue could be measured; and to be virtuous according to Aristotle, a person had to contain goodwill for the greatest good and make choices based on that. When it comes to pleasure and pain, Aristotle states that having the right attitude towards these two feelings is an important habit in forming moral virtue. For example, a greedy eater might feel inappropriate pleasure when presented with food and inappropriate pain when deprived of food; a moderate person will experience pleasure from abstaining from such indulgence. Although Kant and Aristotle have some contrasting views, there are some similarities.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast Aristotle And Epicurus
    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Aristotle And Epicurus

    Although pleasure is a very important and necessary aspect in our lives, the ideas around this premise are not as conceivable and beneficial for all. In a society supporting a larger population of people, Aristotle’s theory would serve best for the society to progress as a…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings