Brutus Anti Federalism

Great Essays
Although the writers of the Brutus essays understood the importance of amending the Articles of Confederation, they nonetheless opposed the ratification of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalist, who wrote the “Brutus” essays in response to the Federalist Papers, were concerned about a powerful centralized government, individual rights and equal representation. In the first of the Brutus essays, the Anti-Federalist articulate their concerns about a strong federal government. The second of the Brutus essays advocates for a bill of rights, in order to ensure people’s individual rights. Lastly the Anti-Federalists wrote in the third of the Brutus essays about the issue of equal representation. In response to the Brutus essays, Madison answered …show more content…
In Federalist number 10, as has been previously argued in this paper, a republican system of government is able to control any abusive government. Additionally, a republican government is able to control any abusive majority from taking advantage of the rights of the minority. Therefore, through this type of government the “public good and the rights of other citizens” is respected. As mentioned before in Federalist number 51, Madison writes that the individual rights and interest of every citizen is connected to the Constitution.Furthermore, in a republic the citizens surrender their rights to a single government. However, the division of government is a creates a “double security” of the rights of the people. In addition, In Federalist 51, Madison makes the assurance that the rights of everyone would be protected. In brief, despite the rule of the majority, the minority has the assurances that their individual rights to life, liberty and property would be …show more content…
Moreover, Madison understood that society was divided in many different aspects of “interests and classes of citizens.” However, through a republican form of government the rights of everyone, including rich and poor, the majority and the minority, would not be in danger. For that reason, in Federalist number 51, Madison writes that a system of checks and balances will protect against the “encroachments of the other”branches of government, including the senate and the general assembly. Furthermore, Madison guarantees that a republican form of government will protect the interest of every man and that said rights must be connected to the Constitution. Thus, a republican form of government would control the abuses of the elite,and provide equal representation before the senate in order to safeguard the interest of the minority and the poor. For that reason, Madison argues that it was necessary to divide the legislative branch into two branches. In addition, the two branches of the general assembly would have different ways of election process, and have as little connection with each other as possible. Lastly, the purpose of the two legislative branches was to guard against “dangerous encroachments” of the representatives on the people’s individual

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny in four ways which were small state-large state comprise, separation of powers, balancing, and creating representatives. The first guard against tyranny was the balancing of powers in the three branches. In Document B, it explains how Madison used checks and balances made each branch do what it does and how each branch is equally in charge of what they do. Checks and Balances…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, Madison’s idea from Federalist 10 was also incorporated into the Constitution. In his essay, he argued the importance of a Republic, opposed to…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also suggested the idea of checks and balances. This is a great tool to use in America’s kind of government because it means no one section of government could become more powerful than the other, the government stays true to the equality values, and it avoids possible corruption. Madison also presented the Virginia Plan which recommended using three branches in our government, a legislative branch, an executive branch, and a judicial branch. This plan is now used as the basis of today’s…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this republican, democratic hybride government, the legislative branch is the most powerful. Therefore, it must be divided into two more branches, the House, and the Senate, which need to have a little of as connection as possible to keep the power…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did James Madison get it right in Federalist No 10? In most regards, Madison did get it right, but technology and our two party system have changed the way an Extended Republic works in this country. In Federalist No 10 Madison gives an alternative to a Pure Democracy, an Extended Republic.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Separating the powers of the central government and allowing them to control each other equally split the power in the government. Madison explained this separation by stating that “the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Doc. C) By separating the central government’s powers, no branch will be able to overpower the others and therefore protects against tyranny.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus, a pseudonym for Robert Gates, was an Anti-Federalist who was against the signing of the Constitution. He wrote to the citizens of New York many documents on his views and why the United States should not be under this new government. In his first paper, he talked about how Congress, the new body of government, could undermine the States under certain circumstances. Also he proposed reasons why this new way of ruling could not rule over such a vast territory that this brand new country came upon on. Many of Brutus’ examples and reasoning still exists in today’s modern era in which these contemporary political circumstances still impact us daily.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalist 10 Summary

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Federalist paper No. 10, written by James Madison, is one of the most influential papers in American History. In this paper he discusses why the new republican from of government is superior to any democratic form of government concerning the constitution. Madison states that each representative will be chosen by a larger number of citizens. That is to say that there will be smaller room for error in selecting unworthy representatives. That being the case, citizens will elect representatives based on merit.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison also identifies two ways to eliminate factions such as authoritarianism and conformism. Madison concludes by explaining how the republican form of government addresses the tyranny of the majority problem. In summary, Federalist No. 10 conveys the theory of pluralism that guided the Constitutions chief…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Americans’ rights and liberties are overtly expressed through the Bill of Rights. Federalists and Republicans possessed contradicting views of the same document, fueling debate. Key Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton intelligently reformed the American economy, eliminating the national debt. The Federalist Papers strategically expressed the movement’s motivations and ideals, thus bolstering support. More than 200 years later, the Federalist-Antifederalist debate comprised of the same key issues that face our nation…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Federalist 51, he proposes the idea of separation of powers, where each branch of government would be mostly independent. In his proposition, branches could not set each other’s salaries and no one would have too much power in assigning members to other branches (Emmett). Because he found the legislative branch a little too powerful in their lawmaking, Madison said that it would be split into two parts, the House and Senate, with different election strategies in each part. This would prevent the legislative branch from overruling the other branches and having more of a say in the flow of governmental issues.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist 47 argues that “the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands,” is a form of tyranny. The Foundering Fathers, especially the authors of the Federalist Papers were concerned with the powers of the executive, legislature and judiciary being consolidated into one area, due to the fear of totalitarianism. Thus, in Federalist 51, James Madison that “the power surrendered by the people,” to the United States of America’s government must be divided within the government to allow “ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” Each branch, the executive, legislature and judiciary were given their own respective powers, and if one branch decided to expand their power, the other branches would stop that expansion in order to prevent their own powers being endangered.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist 10 Analysis

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The dangers of fractions were that if the faction was powerful enough, such as the Republican government, they would sacrifice the rights of the minorities to suit their own selfish interests. Although a pure democracy would mean hearing every single voice and opinion, which is too time confusing and creates confusion. The main idea of the Federalist 10 is the support of a government that establishes basic rights for its citizens and to have a government that does not impose ill will towards its people. The main source of the Federalist 10 is to prove the need for such protection against "the cabals of a few" (Federalist…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Is A Patriot Essay

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus was a patriot and a savior for the people of Rome because he sacrificed his good friend to ensure that Romans would not be enslaved. His actions showed that the people of Rome and their safety come first; him maintaining a relationship with Julius Caesar was a priority for Brutus. Brutus knew that if he did not follow through with his plan, he would regret it for the rest of his life and Romans would die as slaves. Although some would say that Brutus was untrustworthy, by carrying out this attack, he showed how passionate he was about the citizens of Rome. While killing his best friend seemed like an awful thing to many people, Brutus’ decision was indeed correct.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays