The Brain On Trial David Eagleman Analysis

Perspective of David Eagleman in Modern Science
David Eagleman is a famous American writer and neuroscientist. Whose most notable work is “The Brain on Trial” - a narrative that details the lives of different types of people who suffers from glioblastoma. In the article, “The Brain on Trial,” Eagleman suggests to individuals who have mental illnesses, and who have committed crimes that should not suffer. In fact, he states that it is better for criminals who suffer from glioblastoma to place in the mental institution. Eagleman realizes that putting them in mental institutions is the best solution for them and they will surely give them a chance to change. Thus, Eagleman thinks that this will be positive result in less violation for criminals who are mentally ill, fewer people in the jail, and fewer crimes because mentally ill are fully recover and did not make any trouble.
In the beginning, Eagleman believes putting the …show more content…
The mentally are far more likely to be the victim of a crime or to harm them. Their over-representation in the criminal system results from their poor ability to communicate with police, lack of adequate legal representation and the lack of any other place to put them. In fact, if a crime is committed by someone with a brain abnormality, while he or she should be responsible for the offense, the fact that he or she has a mental illness should not be ignored – it is a significant aspect/reason and should highly consider when sentencing him or her. He or she are unable to understand why crime his or her committed is wrong. Forcing the accuser into a correctional facility would do nothing to rehabilitate them, or convicted them of the offense they committed. Placing them into a mental facility would allow them to be restored and to get the help that they