The Blorary Law And The Principles Of International Legal Law

Improved Essays
Generally, there are two elements to define a rule if a customary law or not: the physical and the psychical. In the aspect of the physical element, a customary law has international usage, general practice or usus. Namely, a customary law has to be practiced worldwide, continuously, repeatedly, unanimously and analogously. In the aspect of the psychical element, a customary law has to be accepted by states in the international society, to get the opinion Juris.
The customary laws are usually unwritten. However, there is a trend that to transfer the customary law into the written law. For example, the contents of Principles of International Commercial Contracts were drawn by the UNIDROIT from commercial customary laws.
Thirdly, the general principle is seldom mentioned in legal practice. Principles are usually used to make up the mistakes of the treaties and customs on a certain case. The Article 38 (2) of the Statute of International Court of Justice introduced the ex aequo et bono principle to the judgement.
Subsidiary sources include the judicial decisions and the writings of the most highly qualified scholars. Judicial decisions include the national and the international; but the international is the primary one.
…show more content…
Using teachings of publicists as a source of law is not common enough but can be seen in some national legislations, like the Article 1 of Swiss Civil Code1907, which indicates that ‘the court shall follow established doctrine’. Those teachings of publicists have their influences on the judgements because of the scientific value, the impartiality and the principles they created. Actually, the principles inside these teachings are perhaps the reason why they can become the sources of international law. For example, the Freedom of the Seas principle was a theory, which Hugo Grotius

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Models Of Judicial Decision-Making. n.p.: Macmillan Reference USA, 2008. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I choose the principles of the bureaucratic organization structure, and the organization will be the State of Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security, Tennessee Highway Patrol. As compared there is a principle of fixed and official jurisdictional areas, which are ordered by laws and regulations as seen in the examples, related below. The Tennessee Highway Patrol (THP) is responsible for highway safety on all the Interstate systems and state highways and in some cases all county maintained roads all throughout the state of Tennessee.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Review: The Common Place of Law The Common Place of Law is an interesting empirical research of legal consciousness that is actually a very strong logical theory, in which law is recognized as both constituting and being constituted by social relations and cultural practice. The question that Ewick and Silbey spawn their theory from comes from the classic question, “how is the law experienced” rather than “what is the law,” this was a very compellingly argument made by Ewick and Silbey. The latter question that I saw arise from their argument was from where did most of the classic legal theory and jurisprudence; and did they spring from the subset question “how is the law experienced”. Seeing that law is not something that only exist and can be studied, but law is created by the process of inquiry and definition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been many influences on Canadian law including Hammurabi, Mosaic, and Roman. Britain has had the most influence on Canadian law. Although there have been many influences on Canada 's legal system, Britain has had the most impact for reasons such as Trial by Combat and Ordeal, Common Law, Rule of Law and the British North American Act of 1867. The impact that the Hammurabi laws have had on Canada 's legal system today is that the laws are known, along with the hierarchy of laws.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hammurabi’s influence on punishment and modern society When reading Hammurabi’s code and reaching rule #22: “If anyone is committing a robbery and is caught, then he shall be put to death. ”1 We may agree that it is or it is not the most suitable punishment; however, such punishment is considered just when the code is written to enforce the importance of these rules. In today’s society, the punishment for similar crimes became more lenient than the codes during Hammurabi’s rule as society has grown more merciful and not all crimes are considered equal. Today the code is applicable to the definition of the crimes only, but the punishments for them has shifted over time from the literal letter of the code to a more what we would call…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In every community, there is a set of rules to follow, which is found in the code of the street. The Code of the Street, according to the book, “Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City” by Elijah Anderson, explains more what the code of the street is and why people do things a certain way by saying, “This is because the street culture has evolved a “code of the street” which amounts to a set of informal rules governing interpersonal public behavior. (pg.33).” While the Code of the Street can be seen as a list of rules, it is a lifestyle and a set example of how to do things. One part of the Code of the street is no snitching.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Candilis Research Paper

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Great post! I like what you said, “most laws are created with loops holes, and no laws can adequately deter all unethical issues and misconduct in society.” Broadly speaking, law, particularly American laws, may be viewed as more derivative and more structured than its ethics. The United States codes include codes of basic English law that concerns itself mainly with rules that stabilize private and public institutions. Candilis (2002) states the differences between laws and ethics are characterize by moral rules and moral ideals.…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fundamental objective of international law, to regulate the relations between sovereign states, has become a standard to evaluating the effectiveness of different approaches to international law. Various philosophical disciplines have interpreted the importance and usefulness of international law in order to establish a better understanding of how international law is to be executed. This paper will take a thorough look at how two different philosophers have explained the concepts and principles that make up international law. Specifically, analyzing how Niccolò Machiavelli and Hugo Grotius present contrasting ideas of the original principles of international law and propose different ways through which international law should be justly…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, as rules are applied all-or-nothing , they are inherently restricting and are obstruct judges from determining the “right answer”. As such, Dworkin proposes that judges should view law as a system of principles, policies and other standards , rather than rules, as the former has a range of weight or importance , hence not as limiting. Also, principles may represent public standards of morality , and this means that for Dworkin, judges must draw on these societal perspectives and not political persuasion. Therefore, to follow closely these principles of the judicial system and society, judges cannot have discretion. Overall, Dworkin’s theory is theoretically sensible as it prevents the propagation of unfair or bad rules, hence allowing judges to adequately protect the rights of…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Customary law is a system based on the interpretation of a court case, based on prior cases. This approach is called stare decisis (Scalia 4) which is deciding a case based on precedent. The practice of stare decisis is highly criticized by Scalia. Justice Scalia explains that the system of case precedent or common law review, has two main problems. The first one cited by Justice Scalia is that, common law review applied the law to the fact of a case.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whincup, 1992). The Normans introduced the institution of jury and the absence of the written letter of the law. Common law is laws that are known widely but may not be written down just common sense laws. Stare decisis is an important feature that developed from common law. British colonies adopted the common law as the law of the land.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Normative Order Case Study

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    20 PART A: 1000 RESEARCH INTRODUCTION: The concept of the normative theory of law arose in the twentieth century with the aim of developing an efficient method of legal cognizance . Institutions form a crucial aspect of western law as it involves trust, marriage and property or legislatures and public prosecution agencies in administration sense .…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In defining the extent to which law is a matter of social fact, for example, is it possible that law can be entirely determined by social factors, the pedigree of law traceable via social rules? Or must it be acknowledged that societies themselves defer to an underlying morality that influences law regardless of its social pedigree? There are currently three schools of thought on these questions: natural law theory, hard legal positivism, and soft legal…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is shown through the philosophy provided by Aquinas and Cicero in which they have stated that natural law consist of morality which has been founded through ones experience or through a person’s reasoning on situations. For legal positivist however, a law is considered as good law when the law is enacted by a proper legal authorities, following the rules, procedures and constrains of the legal system. This is provided by legal positivist John Austin in which he was a strong believer of legal positivism. John Austin is more renowned for his Command theory in which he believes that once there is a person of sovereign over a country and this sovereign gives command which must be followed if not there will be sanctions as a consequences. This is regardless whether morality plays a part or…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics