The Black Box Experiment

Improved Essays
What is the scientific method some people may ask? In the black box experiment I will be explaining what the scientific method. This paper will also include what the experiment is and how I discovered my hypotheses along with the theory to get my answer. I will also be explaining what some of these scientific terms are that you may not fully understand. The scientific method is a way to ask and answer scientific questions by making observations and doing experiments. Picture the scientific method as a missing wallet. The first thing you need is to come up with is a problem. As you can see the problem is a missing wallet. The second thing you need is to collect is data. The data would be found by re-tracing your steps. In this example you …show more content…
This part of the experiment will include the what the over all problem is. I will also be taking about the data I found along with the hypothesis and experiments to find my conclusion. As you saw in my example above I stated that my problem was the missing wallet. In this experiment my problem is trying to find what design is in this black box. In order for me to get to my conclusion I have to find data. The data I that was able to receive from my observation is, the black box is a circle. Inside that box is a small marble that is made from metal. I was also able to observer that each box had a number to it and each box had a different shape inside. Now that I have collected all of my data I need to come up with my hypothesis. My first hypothesis was that the shape was in the middle of the box because it might help hold the box together. The second hypothesis I was able to take a guess of the box having a wall down the center to keep the marble on one side. For my final guess I thought that the box was cut into four sections. Now that I was able to come up with three hypothesis from the data I was giving, I have to now experiment. For my first experiment I will observe the box by taking a good look at the design of the. I will be looking for any indentations or marks giving an ideas of where and what the shape was. For my second observation I picked up …show more content…
I believe that with the information that was giving during class I was able to rate my abilities or observation a four out of five. I feel like I was detailed and had a good explanation of what the scientific method is and also good detail with the black box. I was able to discover that as I moved the marble around It would run in contact with a barrier that kept it from going any farther. I knew as I moved it in both directions it would stop in the same spot in each direction. With my observation I discover that you can 't go over it so you can only go around it. In this lab the first part of the paper went well explaining what the scientific method is. I found this part easiest from some of the things I learned when I was in middle school. I had most difficulty when it came to checking punctuation on this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Scientific Method is to help you better understand an experiment by making observations.The steps to the Scientific Method starts by asking a question. Ask a question about your experiment, a question that you do not know the answer to. The next step is to do back round research about your topic. Know your topic well to move onto the next step. Next, construct a hypothesis.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the heart of the scientific process lies testing. In this part of the process can make or break a scientist hypothesis or theory. Testing follows two steps. One, if the idea is correct, what would we expect to see, and two, does that expectation match what we actually observe. Based on how those two questions are answered, testing can either refute a hypothesis or it can lend support.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The researcher will explore certain characteristics of the subjects and determine if further study is required. 2. Explaining an event that had occurred (Explaining Case Study) This is used to help the researcher to explain the cause and effect of a phenomenon that has already happened. The researcher aim to explain the phenomenon based on an available theory or to test the validity of a particular theory. To explain the theory, the researcher need to collect the data from different types of information to describe and makes the reader understand about the theory or the…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Interview My main reason to learn what participants thinks about the giftedness in early childhood. Therefore, interview is a great tool for me to achieve that goal. The semi structured interview are will be the center of this mini study, since guided interview allows researcher to follow format to utilize with all participants (Litchman, 2013). Even though the participants know the purpose of the interview, I will begin the interview by providing information about (a) why conducting the study, (b) what I will do with the information, (c) how long the interview will take. Then, I will start interview with the general personal questions in order to develop a rapport with participant.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moving forward from the failures of experiments, scientists possess a drive to find results to add precision to given paradigms and improve its accountability. To discover the nature of a paradigm, one must follow the set rules passed down from earlier results of attempted experiments with those paradigms. After explain the nature of paradigms, Thomas Kuhn gives insight to the emergence of crises and scientific theories. He defines crises as being the outcome of changes in paradigms and the arrival of new theories brought about by failed theories. What has become common sense or second nature to scientists now is the action to develop a new theory from a failed attempt with an older theory.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Here, peer review, of course, is the evaluation of any truth claims made by social scientists by other social scientists in the same field (in whatever field of social sciences, in specific). Peer review effectively adds a third way by which the social sciences can account for the complexity of the material they study: social phenomena. The scientific method helps social scientists furnish testable claims about what they observe, and likewise, repetition helps ensure what they observe in their experiment is observable in others. But peer review is necessary when it comes to the handling and publishing of data in the social sciences, and namely to critique findings in the data, as well as the methods of gathering or analyzing that data. So even though (for instance), a social scientist may have crafted an experiment to help study a certain social phenomena—and even though it can be repeated—other analysis, via peer review, is absolutely necessary in the social sciences to give critical insight into the structural flaws in research, or the gathering or interpreting of data.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Final 2) Explain in detail the relationship between the concepts of a hypothesis, theory, and law. Be sure to not only define each word but to discuss the intricacies of how these three concepts are related. You should also include a discussion that explains why a scientist might get offended by someone who refuses to accept the validity of a scientific theory by claiming, “it’s just a theory,” and someone who claims that a hypothesis is an educated guess. A hypothesis is based on prior knowledge and observations; it should be falsifiable. Hypotheses are used in experiments to predict the outcome explaining why, how, or what will happen in an experiment.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From there I had to form a hypothesis supported by my research. Once my hypothesis was formed, I could set up my experiment in which I used a questionnaire to determine where subjects were on a scale of extraversion and a short term memory test. After performing my experiment, I had to collect my data and determine what my results met through statistical significance. While my result proved to be statistically insignificant, I learned how to implement the scientific method to obtain knowledge in the field of…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this experiment, students were able to learn about the basic elements of the scientific inquiry which helped students think critically—students also used the scientific method to conduct this experiment. In this experiment, we were given a black bottle and a bag that had items that could be inside the bottle. The independent variable was the contents inside the bag, while the dependent variable was the contents inside the black bottle since that is what we had determine. In order to learn more about the elements of scientific inquiry, we made observations in order to come up with a hypothesis. Through observations, we got an idea of what we could hypothesis—observations gave us limitations on what we could hypothesis.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Black Box Ideas

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It discusses the characteristics found in scientific knowledge, along with a variety of concepts such as bias, uncertainty, limitations, and reliability. Idea 2: Another concept that was illustrated through the black box activity was Inference vs. Observation. This activity required the participants to use Scientific Inquiry and the Scientific Method to formulate a process of examination on the black box. They were required to make observations and revisit steps to gather data, before forming inferences based on prior knowledge and the gathered information.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays