Even the least environmentally conscious individuals are able to both see and sense the environmental changes that are taking place just outside our windows. Although not a new concept, climate concerns regarding Global Warming have never been more of a realistic or pressing concern than they are today. Among other things, it has been an accumulation of environmental negligence that has led us to our current state, specifically referring to mankind’s production of greenhouse gasses, such as CO2, and even more specifically referring to our choice of energy production used. As opposed to carbon-free electrical production, using nuclear energy, there’s a nationwide shift towards natural gas, due to its inexpensive electric capacity.
…show more content…
But will there ever be a change between Fossil Fuels and Nuclear Energy? Well according to Stephen Kellert and his Biophilia Hypothesis, there would not be a change unless humanity joins all together to create a change for the better of the environment and themselves. The only way that humans may all join together is if the climate change was so severe that their own lives were in danger. According to Stephen Kellert’s, The Biological Basis for Human Values of Nature, he talks about the United States and Japan and how they only show interest about some things about nature. Both the countries do show interest in the natural world and want to protect it and enjoy the aspects of nature, but is there ever any actions ever happening to resolve any of these issues to nature? Most Americans would use nature for various purposes even though they would be inflicting more damage to the environment. Most humans are very self-centered toward the natural world. The global climate change will eventually affect the world in a variety of ways such as the destruction of crops because of the uses of fossil fuels. According to Stephen Kellert eventually there will need to be a change where human will have to come together to help prevent the ending of humankind from climate changes and Nuclear energy may be the solution to help the natural world. But for right now there are no actions happening to change this
But will there ever be a change between Fossil Fuels and Nuclear Energy? Well according to Stephen Kellert and his Biophilia Hypothesis, there would not be a change unless humanity joins all together to create a change for the better of the environment and themselves. The only way that humans may all join together is if the climate change was so severe that their own lives were in danger. According to Stephen Kellert’s, The Biological Basis for Human Values of Nature, he talks about the United States and Japan and how they only show interest about some things about nature. Both the countries do show interest in the natural world and want to protect it and enjoy the aspects of nature, but is there ever any actions ever happening to resolve any of these issues to nature? Most Americans would use nature for various purposes even though they would be inflicting more damage to the environment. Most humans are very self-centered toward the natural world. The global climate change will eventually affect the world in a variety of ways such as the destruction of crops because of the uses of fossil fuels. According to Stephen Kellert eventually there will need to be a change where human will have to come together to help prevent the ending of humankind from climate changes and Nuclear energy may be the solution to help the natural world. But for right now there are no actions happening to change this