The Binary Gender System

Improved Essays
As previously stated, the binary gender system does not promote self-interest, societal happiness, social structure, peace or prosperity. These goals could be obtained by removing gender, as will be shown with use of classical utilitarian, egoist, Kantian, and social contract ethics.
Classical utilitarianism decides morality by looking at the overall happiness of a population using the principle of utility, “Jeremy Bentham’s principle which approves or disapproves of every action whatsoever, according to the tendency which it appears to have to augment or diminish the happiness of the party whose interest is in question” (Vaughn, 2015). Taking all of the vulnerable populations at hand within the binary gender system, being that of women, intersex or transgender, it is apparent that the actions of discrimination against these parties leads to a clear deterioration of happiness, thus making it immoral. If the gender system was removed, the issues associated with sexism and homophobia would no longer flourish, leading to a proliferation of happiness to a majority. Those who follow the heterosexist views would be disappointed in their loss, but the disappointment would not overcome the surreal bliss of others.
Ethical egoism uses the advancement of the
…show more content…
Thomas Hobbes argues that humans are inherently stingy, and use people as a means to advance their self-interest, which leads to civil unrest, and without cooperation and restraint, will continue on a dubious path of self-destruction. Through cooperation, restraint, and understanding, the constructs of the binary gender system now in place could be altered, or removed, to allow for a higher level of peace, prosperity, and safety among

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    European philosophers as early as the seventeenth century begin debating how to run government. As different forms of democracy come about, wars breakout amongst European nations. Ideas on human nature and how man runs government spread throughout the world, determining for years the ways of society. The first philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, promotes the strict monarchy of commonwealth, the second, John Locke, promotes the liberal monarchy, and the last, Jean-Jacques Rousseau promotes liberal republicanism. Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, born in 1588 of Malmesbury, is most known for his work in modern political philosophy.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gender effect in the Sierra Leone War Through Ishmael Beah and Mariatu Kamara’s autobiographies, the world learned about the devastating war in Sierra Leone through the eyes of a boy and a girl. The civil war stripped children from their families and killed many innocent civilians. In A Long Way Gone by Beah Beah he says, “One of the main aims of the rebels was to force the civilians to stay with them, especially women and children” (Beah 37). The rebels used the civilians as either bait for the army or as servants. They took girls to cook or exploit and recruited boys as soldiers.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Thomas Hobbes book “The Leviathan” Hobbes has stated how we as humans come to live in society in where we are by nature equal in power, and even the weakest of man can simply scheme to kill the strongest. This is achieved by joining hands with others that are in the same position as the first individual. These aspects according to Hobbs combined with limited resources, and a natural distrust amongst man leads to a “perpetual state of conflict”. Without a common power or government to control man and distribute resources so that there is no need for fighting man live in constant anarchy. We live in constant distrust that is why we have weapons, and that is why we have locks to shield our homes, it is in only in our nature.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke and Hobbes use their states of nature to help construct their governments, and is crucial to their theories. Locke’s state of nature allows for rebellion and protection of private property by making the state of nature peaceful, so people do not fear falling back into the state of nature. Hobbes, on the other hand, creates a state of nature that is cruel and brutal to prevent the want to overthrow the government, because any state is better than the state of nature. Both Hobbes’ and Locke’s theories of government depend on their theories as to what the state of nature is.…

    • 2439 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes the source of conflict is self-preservation (p. 9), meaning that even though various causes of conflict appear in the state of nature, the underlying cause of conflict is self-preservation. He believes not only do humans want to survive in the present, but also they want to ensure their survival in the future. In order to survive in the future, humans need resources which leads to violent conflict with others. Hobbes paints a very messy picture of life. He explicitly states the need for a social contract, so that people aren’t always in conflict with one another (p. 13).…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sex Selection In Australia

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 2004, the National Health and Medical Research Council (‘NHMRC’) banned sex selection on moral and social grounds, except in the case of a serious genetic condition. However, recent debates in Australia have led the NHMRC to consider the prospect of lifting the life ban. It is inherent in such a culturally diverse society that the public cannot reach one consensus. While some believe that sex selection is unethical for ‘moral’ purposes, others believe that it is an ethical means of hindering sexism in a paternalistic society (Sureau, 1999). Consequently, whether the ban on sex selection is acceptable or should be lifted remains a contentious topic, ultimately excluding a portion of society.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gender Blur

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aaron Devor, the author of the essay “Gender Role Behaviors and Attitudes”, states that gender is a social construct that has very little to do with biology. On the other hand, Deborah Blum, in her essay “The Gender Blur: Where Does Biology End And Society Take Over”, claims that while society has an effect on gender, so does biology. In this essay, I plan to present the argument that biology and society both have an effect on gender. I, like Blum, noticed biological gender differences in my children (two boys and a girl). As a father who has raised his children to believe that, men and women both do the housework, I noticed that my boys were much more aggressive than my daughter ever was even before pre-school.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘“Night to His Day’: The Social Construction of Gender,” Judith Lorber’s article written in the mid 90s, describes western societies as having two genders: men and women. Lorber explains that, while they not wholly separate genders, transvestities and transexuals are “crossover genders” (2007: 43) floating in between society’s two genders. Society’s framework for gender affects everything a person does from the moment that person is born, without them even knowing it. The clothes a person wears, the friends a person makes, the job that person ultimately does or does not get: all affected by gender.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    #1.) There are many ways that gender can be defined and experienced. In our first class discussion, we examined how gender can be an identity, expression, expectation, and an attribution. Kate Bornstein addressed these terms in “Gender Outlaw.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The binary gender system is the accepted notion in the society which labels gender as two different and opposite forms i.e. men and women. The system makes it easier to understand how society works as it assigns the identity to both males and females where males are supposed to be masculine and females feminine. It also establishes the roles in the society and creates a ‘normal’ society in which a woman does housework, takes care of the family and the man is the breadwinner of the family. Although the system looks very simple and good but there are many limitations of the system as it ignores the complexity and diversity of the sex and gender. This paper examines the threats and difficulties which a binary gender system poses to the society…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes is a well renowned philosopher, specifically in the world of political philosophy. His work the Leviathan opened up revolutionary ideas that were beyond his time. Hobbes wrote the “Leviathan” during the English Civil War, a war caused by religion and violently ending with the beheading of the king. Hobbes watched this madness unfold, leading him to extend a “helping hand” over to England authority, by publicizing a solution for all to read. His work introduced a radical topic by the name of “Social Contract,” which proposed that a person’s morals and/or political obligations are dependent on an agreement to form or coexist in a society.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hobbes’ maintains humans have a “natural condition,” which may be either blissful or brutish. Given such condition, Hobbes asks, how members of society to act/ought to be. Intuitively many philosophers agree members of a society existing blissfully is not only preferred, but better. And, if we grant what is better for society captures that which is good for a society, then individuals ought to act according to the promotion of this peaceful societal end. One objection to Hobbes comes from whether an individual has the right to opt-out of the contract.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coincidently, Locke’s hypocrisy promotes Thomas Hobbes’ idea that people only strive for power, and will do whatever it takes to sustain that power (Hobbes, 1651 & Locke, 1689). In the end, the idea of human nature is inevitable subjective to each and every person and their philosophical…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays