In this essay, it will examine the relationship between the two main purposes of punishment which are retribution and restoration. In order to do this, it will first define what restoration and retribution are, which will ultimately help illustrate the differences in the approach to justice shaping a better understanding of how it operates. It will critically analyse this relationship by looking in detail at a variety of different sources and the works of theorists such as Walgrave, Duff and Brunk who covers critically on this. This will evidently provide an ease of understanding for showing the similarities and differences between restoration and retribution.
Retribution, in the simplest form, can be defined as the assumption that criminal offenders deserve to be punished for a criminal act. Galligan (1981: p.152) puts it “the core of the idea of retribution is the moral notion that the …show more content…
The body of research paints a picture of how fragile the two principle are in the sense that they are still evolving and the issue lies in the primary purpose and goals of each. Whether restoration can co-exist alongside formal criminal justice approaches has been answered. Restoration provide an important addition to the imposed sanctions on criminal behaviour by the traditional criminal justice system. To elaborate, the research indicated that to critically analyse this relationship we must stop comparing retribution justice and restorative justice in oppositional terms. For example, morris and young (2000: p.23) assert that retributive justice is ‘fundamentally at odds with the defining values of restorative justice and cannot, therefore be part of it’. This perhaps suggest that it is important to move beyond the simple contrast of retributive and restorative justice and use restoration to seek an additional response to
Retribution, in the simplest form, can be defined as the assumption that criminal offenders deserve to be punished for a criminal act. Galligan (1981: p.152) puts it “the core of the idea of retribution is the moral notion that the …show more content…
The body of research paints a picture of how fragile the two principle are in the sense that they are still evolving and the issue lies in the primary purpose and goals of each. Whether restoration can co-exist alongside formal criminal justice approaches has been answered. Restoration provide an important addition to the imposed sanctions on criminal behaviour by the traditional criminal justice system. To elaborate, the research indicated that to critically analyse this relationship we must stop comparing retribution justice and restorative justice in oppositional terms. For example, morris and young (2000: p.23) assert that retributive justice is ‘fundamentally at odds with the defining values of restorative justice and cannot, therefore be part of it’. This perhaps suggest that it is important to move beyond the simple contrast of retributive and restorative justice and use restoration to seek an additional response to