Role Of The Judiciary In The Philippines

Decent Essays
Ultimately, the judiciary is defined as a branch of government in which judicial power is vested into a system of courts of law and the judges in it. Despite having different court structures and hierarchies, the purpose of the judiciary in both Malaysia and Philippines is to ensure justice is delivered, and it does so by utilising the functions of its courts with the help of judges playing their respective roles. Three main roles are played by the judiciary in general, that is, to hear cases on civil or criminal matters, to interpret and give effect to the Constitution and legislations, as well as to exercise the functions of judicial review. In applying the first role of deciding cases involving disputes over rights, both countries apply the English doctrine of stare decisis in handling each case, that is, judges are compelled to follow the decision of a higher court in cases of similar facts. Each level of court in the hierarchy has its own role to play …show more content…
As the highest court in their respective hierarchies, both courts play a significant role in the judiciary as they are empowered under their Constitutions to settle matters that are of constitutional importance as well as to settle disputes of civil or criminal matters objectively. Thus, these courts are capable of performing all three roles due to their wide jurisdiction to hear any case brought before them.
However, the bulk of cases are dealt by the lower courts who apply precedents in deciding cases. Appeals on questions of law goes up to the Court of Appeal, while the Federal Court or Supreme Court will deal with mostly matters of constitutional importance or exceptional circumstances. Some parallel courts run alongside the civil court system, such as the Syariah courts which exist in both countries to hear disputes on Muslim rights for marriage, succession, inheritance, and divorce based on Islamic

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the court system judicial authority is shared between the levels of government. Today, the Texas Constitution lacks power in people, campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters. Due to lack of these powers, people distrust the changes that could give the government even more power. Thought the states in United States, the Texas judiciary is among the most complicated and confusing systems. Courts are expected by the country to act in nonpolitical ways, focus on the wishes of the electorate, focus on justice, and give the fair and right judgment for the citizens.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the late 1700s, the Federalists Papers, essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay spoke volumes to the colonial citizens. Divided into factions, the Federalists and Anti-federalists had their own views on how the government should be run. Avid supporters of the Constitution, the Federalists made a name for themselves, disguising the fact they were committed to a nationalist government. On the other hand, the Anti-federalists focused more on the true principles of the Revolution. In articles seventy-eight and seventy-nine published under Publis and Brutus, the authors clarified the structure, powers, appointments and independence of the judiciary branch.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitutional Convention was a very special event that shaped American history, it all started with one bright idea. After the Articles of Confederation, James Madison and others noticed that the central government created by the Articles of Confederation was weak and ineffective. So many famous political attended a convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The convention was held at the State House of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in May through September of 1787. They created a strong central government still used today!…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a benchmark United States Supreme court case in which the court formed the foundation for the exercise of Judicial review under Article 3 of the US constitution. The landmark decision of this case, defined the boundaries between the Executive and Judicial branches of the US government. Case Summary The case started with the petition filed to the supreme Court on February 11, 1803 by William Marbury. William Marbury had been appointed justice of Peace in the district of Columbia by the president John Adams but whose commission was not later delivered.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are three branches that make up the United States Government, and that includes: the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Each branch has a certain job to do, so to say, and each one is made up of different types of people; whether this concerns their religion, race, political party or gender. The demographics of each of these branches affects their duties in some way, either good or bad. It affects the American people, their lives, and the society they live in. These four major demographics, race, religion, gender and political party, are important when it comes to the decisions these branches in the American government are to uphold.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Fifteenth Amendment guarantees that the "right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. "(Library of Congress). This means, in theory, that any US citizen should be able to vote no matter what their background. But the limits of this amendment are very apparent. This amendment does not guarantee rights of black women, they were not able to vote until 1920, earned with the rise of the woman’s suffrage movement.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Branch

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article III of the constitution established the Judicial Branch. This branch is made up of the supreme court and all of the lower courts. The Judicial Branch is unique from the other two branches. The executive and legislative branches members are chosen by the people. Whereas the judicial branches members are chosen only by the president with the approval of the senate.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cases begin their journey in a lower court and if needed, work their way up to a higher court. State courts mostly have two levels of trail courts inclusive of limited jurisdiction and specific jurisdiction. Courts of general jurisdiction are inclusive of circuit courts, superior courts, district courts, or courts of common pleas, They hear lawsuits that are attached to larger monetary issues, or more serious types of crimes than cases heard in a limited venue. When a case progresses, there is the appellate courts, which do not hold trails, but rather, function to review the decisions made by lower courts, and uphold or reverse the decision made The distraction of a multi court system…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They use judicial review to determine if a court case’s law or actions contradicted the constitutional. Through the review of all the facts and information in each case as well the decision of that they can tell if that case goes with the constitution or against the constitution. Some may think one case is with the constitution while another case of similar fashion is unconstitutional. That is because the justices have different minds and also have their own opinions of each case that they see. When they have decided that a case is unconstitutional then there will be steps and procedures that will get that case repealed and another decision be made about that case.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil law systems give their legislatures the power to make laws not to judges. Judges in this system makes their decisions based on legal codes, laws, and statues. Each case that a judge hears is treated as an individual incident without precedent. In the Islamic system the Qur’an, the Sunna, judicial consensus, and analogical reasoning are the basis for judges to make decisions (Vago,…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics