The wonders of space leave countless nations all over the globe in demand to discover further. Especially in this day and age, room for the development of new and innovative technologies can aid in the prediction of massive catastrophic collisions and uncover alternative eco-friendly ways humans rapidly consume and dispose of resources. These ideas have lead to the suggestions of permanently inhabiting new life off of planet Earth. It may seem like a far-fetched idea, however, scientists, environmentalists and astronomers hypothesize that this outlook may be closer than we think. The proposal of beginning life in space continues to reveal new and exclusive aspects of human physiology and psychology – many of which may induce fear in an abundant
…show more content…
Situating members of a team to constant exposure to the dangerous chemicals required for “lift-off”, some including radiation, later result in the reduction of a particularly significant working population and also leaves incredibly costly bills for many companies that can use the money elsewhere. Researchers are constantly searching for alternative routes to achieve such tasks because of the many requirements to safely launch and land humans in space or on other planetary surfaces. The National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) has enabled “space-based nuclear reactors… to get people off Earth’s surface” (Morring). Entailing the use of hazardous chemicals for energy wants to be out of the picture for many. Although nuclear power reduces the exposure of radiation to their workers, this marginal still necessitates a heavy consignment. “The three principal types of reactors under consideration are those cooled by a pumped liquid metal, like sodium or lithium, by… liquid metal heat pipes and by inert helium or helium-xenon gas. Regardless of which one ultimately is chosen, it would allow scientists to conduct the same kind of orbital research at distant Jupiter that is now only possible in Earth orbit” (Morring). In essence, the prolongation of improving and advancing these machinery characteristics, “the recycling of human waste, used resources and utilization of planetary resources are crucial to long-duration missions”
Situating members of a team to constant exposure to the dangerous chemicals required for “lift-off”, some including radiation, later result in the reduction of a particularly significant working population and also leaves incredibly costly bills for many companies that can use the money elsewhere. Researchers are constantly searching for alternative routes to achieve such tasks because of the many requirements to safely launch and land humans in space or on other planetary surfaces. The National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) has enabled “space-based nuclear reactors… to get people off Earth’s surface” (Morring). Entailing the use of hazardous chemicals for energy wants to be out of the picture for many. Although nuclear power reduces the exposure of radiation to their workers, this marginal still necessitates a heavy consignment. “The three principal types of reactors under consideration are those cooled by a pumped liquid metal, like sodium or lithium, by… liquid metal heat pipes and by inert helium or helium-xenon gas. Regardless of which one ultimately is chosen, it would allow scientists to conduct the same kind of orbital research at distant Jupiter that is now only possible in Earth orbit” (Morring). In essence, the prolongation of improving and advancing these machinery characteristics, “the recycling of human waste, used resources and utilization of planetary resources are crucial to long-duration missions”