Climate change, a real threat to the entire world, has become a foreground to many leaders in our country, leading some to even …show more content…
A lot of budgets underestimate, such as when the Monticello Nuclear Plant "upgrades cost a fraction of the price of building a new plant, but still blew past initial cost calculations" (Scherer 2). However, there are multiple sources that show that, in the end, nuclear is cheaper than solar. One example hits close to home, claiming that "The Vogtle nuclear plants coming online near Atlanta generate a kilowatt of power at half the cost of Crescent Dunes Solar Facility" (Trembath 4). Therefore, it seems very logical to use nuclear because it provides the most effectiveness for the financial cost. Another cost outside of finance is that nuclear power plants are catastrophic if they meltdown, leaving whole entire areas radioactive and uninhabitable. Terrorists could use this fact to make them a prime target, and it could be a reason that "America is deterred by terrorism" inside of the Syrian refugee movement (Syrian refugees 3). With proper security and personnel, which our country most certainly has, the threat of nuclear terrorism happening becomes minimal to