The Benefits Of Keeping Up With The Kardashian Family

Decent Essays
Singer’s views and opinions on world poverty are valid and logical. Supporting evidence is found in celebrities in entertainment and personal experience. Many people spend extreme amounts of money on luxury items such as vacations, new cars, clothes, shoes, etc. But, how much of those things can really be considered “necessities?” The Kardashian family has made their fortune from their television series Keeping Up with the Kardashians and also with the people they choose to have relations with. However, almost all of this money is spent on houses, cars, and vacations around the world. These activities are, no doubt, very exciting and enjoying to partake in, however, they are by no means essential to life. The combined net worth of the Kardashian family is about $400 million dollars. Even if this number was cut in half, $200 million would be more than enough to support their lavish lifestyle. On a much smaller scale, there are approximately 4.78 million people in the state of Alabama. If a statewide law was passed that a percentage of the tax taken out of employee checks went to the need for food and medicine all over the world, and in the United States, how quickly …show more content…
Many people find comfort in knowing they have extra cash in preparation for unexpected events. My family does not often donate money to causes for medicine and food. My mother halves our extra funds each month, and puts them into an emergency bank account and our vacation fund. Our family as a unit is not required to give any money to the effort as my parents work for their money and are rightfully paid for it. Individuals will have different opinions on what “necessities” are depending on how they were raised and how they live now. Those that grew up in wealthy households and also have high paying jobs now will not see their splurges as “want” items. These people are simply doing as they have always

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In If We’re So Rich, Why Aren’t We Happy, the author, Margaret Wente addresses the correlation between being rich and being happy. She argues that spending and consuming is now the habitual lifestyle of financially adequate people and is misconceived as the solution to happiness. In today’s world where an individual’s life is driven between stores and malls, alongside the daily advancement of technology, and the system of following the trend, we become accustomed to keep up with the rest of the crowd. However, when our choices are a mimic of others or are made to feel superior to others, are we ultimately attaining happiness?…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Peter Singer informs his readers about the defects in society's attempt toward world poverty and the issues related with it through illustrations utilizing a philosophical contention to state that individuals ought to give 100% of their unnecessary salary to abroad guide associations. Singer uses hypothetical methods to achieve his objective of getting perusers to really trust his thoughts and change their qualities and customs. He uses a frustrated but yet straightforward tone in this article and shows his perspective in an enthusiastic way by giving various hypothetical illustrations. Singers point of the story is that it is wrong for people to spend their money on non-essential things such as vacations and eating out when there are kids…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every day, millions of well-off people throughout the world buy brand-new vehicles worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, large entertainment systems to put inside their luxury homes, and countless amounts of other luxury items that are not considered necessities. In “The Ethical Life”, there is an excerpt from Peter Singer from “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” which Singer argues that the people that do not donate to those in need in-fact can donate. Singer believes that by not donating, one is purposely letting a child starve to death. In which, his solution to saving a child is to give up everyday luxuries, such as the ones listed above. Not only is Singer’s solution unrealistic but it is also extremely demanding to everyday people, especially when one has responsibilities, problems, and much more to deal with of their own.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “Homeless, Mike Dick Was 51, Looked 66,” author Kevin Fagan stated that “The nation needs to commit, emotionally and economically, to saving these older folks” (321.) The older folks referred to in the article are homeless people that live across the United States. Fagan maintained that the nation can do better in terms giving back to the needy, especially considering the wealthy of the nation. However, what Fagan failed to mention in the article is what the homeless are not doing for themselves. Long time homelessness is a predicament that can only be blamed on the homeless because people that wind up homeless for whatever reasons are capable of changing their situation.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a society where “giving food to starving kids in Africa” has become almost a cliché, utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer makes the readers of The New York Times step back and reevaluate their spending choices in his 1999 essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”. Through a mixture of examples and facts Singer calls upon those with excess money, typically used on luxuries, to instead donate that money for overseas aid agencies. In order to persuade the reader to follow through with his solution, he utilizes anecdotes and facts, emotional statements, and an impression to communicate the importance of donating to these agencies. At the start of the article, Singer opens with an anecdote from the movie “Central Station”.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Preference Utilitarian Peter Singer maintains that it is a moral wrong for those in affluent countries to not do more to prevent starvation in other parts of the world. Singer formulates this argument in his paper ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. Singer argues from the side of consequentialism, in particular Utilitarianism; an ethical philosophy in which the happiness of the greatest number of people in the society is considered the greatest good. Several philosophers have countered Singer’s theory, claiming that our moral duties are lessened by the distance of those suffering in other parts of the world. Moreover, critics of consequentialism argue that it does not allow agents to act in accordance with their own needs.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer begins his argument on Famine, Affluence, and Morality with heart wrenching facts and statements about disasters happening all over the world but more specifically, East Bengal. He claims people are dying in East Bengal from lack of food, shelter, and medical care. The relentless poverty, a cyclone, and a civil war turned at least nine million people into refugees. Singer further explains that the richer nations have enough money to completely fix this issue and still have a surplus of cash in the bank. He calls the same attention to the individual level as well; he states with the exception of a select few, the mass majority of individuals do not morally feel responsible to help the situation in any significant way.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Comparability In Famine, Affluence, and Morality by Peter Singer, he argues that we are morally obligated to donate as much money to charity as we can to help limit poverty in the world. Singer explains that there are many people in the world suffering from poverty, and living very poor-quality lives as a result of poverty. He argues that poverty is morally wrong because of the suffering it promotes. Singer believes it is the moral obligation of humans to donate as much as they can to help limit the suffering of the poor in the world, without sacrificing anything moral comparability. In this paper, I will argue that Singer uses vague language to describe what the line is for moral comparability.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Makes the World Go Round Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer, explains in the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” that all prosperous people should give all money that is not needed for basic necessities to places that are in need of food and medicine. As an American, I have knowledge this argument would shake up America as a whole. This could create a world of giving up the Capitalistic ways of America and the economic food chain. On the other hand, it could create a world of kindness and less violence. Can you imagine giving up your freedom to help others?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Peter Singer Analysis

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many would agree that murder is the most morally atrocious and impermissible thing that an autonomous being can commit. As well, many would agree that there is a certain moral obligation that everyone should have to their fellow man, and hence feel some obligation to help prevent the suffering of a fellow man if the opportunity presents itself. However, how far does that obligation stretch? Does it go beyond the bounds of only being morally responsible for the circumstances that you can see in front of you? Or are people in a way just as much responsible for all the suffering throughout the world that we have the capability to help prevent; such as the suffering of the global poor.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this essay, “The Impact Celebrities Have On Our Lives,” the author Deborah King, discusses the topic or main idea, How celebrities have an impact on our lives. To begin with, “King” points out that celebrities are playing a huge role in our lives. The author also indicates that celebrities are Serving as our role models of taste, style and public opinion throughout the world. Their endorsement and creative input enables them to bring attention, credibility and other intangible benefits to us. Furthermore, the biggest structure or foundation of this essay is that even celebrities have leaders or people they look up to but us the people are the celebrities followers.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The choices made by today’s media, such as “news reports” and television shows flaunting celebrities famous for being celebrities, might show that the world is solely populated by materialists. But, pondering the situation, one must come to see that at least a portion of those watching these “news reports” of fashion and celebrity icons must be romanticists. They pine for a better life for themselves or their family, but do not have the good fortune to be one of the rich or famous. Another completely separate faction are realists when it comes to such “news” programs and the misplaced attention on the rich and famous. This group may take a short moment to assess the situation and then do what is called for: change the channel.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peter Singer Argument

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The underlying goal of philosophy is to help humans seek the ultimate truth to the questions that orbit their knowledge for the meaning of existence. One question that many philosophers are challenging themselves to answer would be that of just how far individuals should go in order to provide relief for those who are suffering from poverty. After attaining a degree in bioethics, a professor by the name of Peter Singer recently ventured to provide the world with an answer to the question that had been protruding the minds of many philosophers. Singer claims, “The formula is simple: whatever money you’re spending on luxuries, not necessities, should be given away.” Although Singer’s argument proposes an idea that could be beneficial towards…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Keeping up with the Kardashians, is a reality docu-soap that presents the lives of the Kardashian-Jenner family on the television screen. The Kardashian-Jenner family members that are currently on screen, include Kim Kardashian, Khloé Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Kris Jenner, Caitlyn Jenner (formerly the Olympian Bruce Jenner), Kylie Jenner, Kendall Jenner, Scott Disick and Kanye West. This docu-soap has shown tremendous success ever since its first airing in 2007, with several spin-off docu-soaps being released and the Kardashian-Jenner’s rising fame gaining international recognition (Eonline 2015). This American reality television series has aired on channel “E!” and is currently in its 10th season, with the focus still being on the family’s…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays