The Benefits Of Cloning

Improved Essays
Cloning, however, is very controversial and there is often debate about whether or not the cloning of humans, animals, or even body parts should be allowed (Murnaghan 1). Some advocates for cloning believe that it offers significant benefits to society, while opponents of this topic suggest otherwise. Though both ideas coexist in society, scientists should only be permitted to clone humans and animals for medical purposes only. One significant medical benefit from cloning would be that it saves people and animals’ lives. For example, in 2012, a three-year-old girl, named Pippie Kruger, was severely burnt after a kerosene tank exploded during a backyard barbecue (Tedx 10:50-11:00). The explosion resulted in severe burns that covered her …show more content…
Some people do not think it should take place because they believe that cloning is very dangerous for the humans and animals involved; they believe that the technology used in the cloning process is harmful to those involved, as well (Quinonez 1). For example, cloning may put them at a higher risk of developing genetic defects; it may cause premature aging, which would, in turn, lead to premature death (Quinonez 1). On the other hand, those that are oppose to cloning need to take into consideration that the technology used is relatively new and is still developing. It is obvious to note that the technology would have made mistakes and would not have worked one-hundred percent correctly the first time used. As researchers get more accustomed to the technology, they will be able to make improvements to it; this will, in turn, make the process of cloning a lot safer. This will help to lessen a person’s chances of getting genetic defects and other side effects, as well. Therefore, as improvements are made to the cloning process, the technology used will become much safer; this will allow more people to become advocates for human and animal …show more content…
Cloning, therefore, should not be permitted for nonmedical purposes. One significant reason why cloning should not be done for nonmedical reasons is that it will eventually lead to the overpopulation of humans and animals (Rawat 1). If scientists are constantly cloning new organisms, then every human or animal would have to compete with each other for space and resources. As a result, survival of the fittest would take place. In simpler terms, only the dominant, well-adapted individuals would survive and the inferior ones would die off. Cloning would ultimately, “put acute pressure on natural resources and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others. These scientists are making the clones suffer through unneeded complications. Head states in the article, “Should human cloning be banned?”, “Scientists generally agree that it would be irresponsible to clone a human being until cloning has been perfected, given that the cloned human would probably face serious, and ultimately terminal, health issues.” It is impetuous for scientists to continue cloning because the babies that were made are alive and have their own feelings. They should not be forced to live with health issues their entire life because of our imperfect experiments. Scientists only want to create clones in order to have better organ donors.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments have been made stating that cloning could save lives, but it would jeopardize many more than it would save the scientists from the article “The Cloning Debate. Should All Forms Of Human Cloning Be Banned?” State “Many experts say reproductive cloning is grossly unethical because it jeopardizes the health of would-be child clones. They note that efforts to clone sheep, pigs, goats and other animals yield few live births, and that many live-born mammal clones die within weeks or months because of abnormalities.” If humans were to reproduce through cloning we would have very little success and the children would not live for very long. Why…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some scientists believe otherwise though. They claim that cloning extinct or endangered animals would undo the damage we’ve done to the species, or it would be a positive advancement for science, allowing us to study newer species. However, as stated before, the possible consequences would outweigh the benefits. Cloning would do damage to the environment and other species, and it could actually lead to more endangered animals. "It totally ignores the very practical realities of what conservation is about," conservation ecologist at Duke University, Stuart Pimm says.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, de-extinction possibly will change priorities for medical researchers. This would not be good because these researchers will be worrying more about bringing back already extinct animals, rather than worrying about keeping alive humans and animals already living today. De-extinction remains unnecessary. Although it possibly will provide a few benefits and seeing a real live wooly mammoth or…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Often, when on the subject of whether or not animals should be used in animal research, it generally sparks up a debate. Some argue that animal testing does not work and the practice is cruel to animals while others argue that the use of animal research has produced tremendous medical breakthroughs and should not be stopped. Yes, animal testing has resulted in great medical discoveries and could be used to potentially discover more, however, new technological advances in medicine such as the 3D biomedical printer can eventually replace the need for animal testing and as a result of that cost of research will go down dramatically as well as animals will no longer suffer for no reason. There is absolutely no doubt that animal testing…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gene Doping In Spiderman

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    But to create a super human and using science technology to manipulate a human’s natural qualities has many negative aspects. The first disadvantage is that humans will lose their individuality when creating a super human, everyone will be exactly the same. Next, it is unethical to subject animals and embryos to undergo testing when no one can tell whether they are suffering or not. There are moral aspects that need to be addressed, if this research were to be continued there must be a board regulating every step. The society will benefit from preventing harmful diseases but the health risks the research poses is huge.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research on human embryonic stem cells, how ever is controversial, given the diverse views held in our society about the moral and legal status of early embryo.” (National Research 1). Opposers argue that destroying embryonic cells and fetuses to obtain stem cells is something humans should not mess with. The general public believes that biomedical researches are “playing god” by destroying embryonic cells, but scientists have a bigger fear. Scientists fear that stem cell research will eventually lead to the creation of human clones. The reasoning behind this fear…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proponents of the idea say that cloning could lead to more disease resistant plants, but, this very creation could cause lack of DNA diversity. So, cloning should not be allowed because because people are still very conflicted on the subject, also the cost of cloning is too extreme and, it would lack in DNA diversity. First of all, cloning is still very new to the world. Although cloning has been around since Dolly the Sheep, the whole world is still conflicted on the subject. Some feel that the cloning of embryos, is morally repugnant and may feel that the idea of cloning humans is “playing God” according to “What are the Pros and Cons of Cloning?” So, if too many people are conflicted based on a moral stance, it will create too much turmoil in the science community.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dangers Of Human Cloning

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Humans are another species that scientists want to add to the list of living species that have been cloned. “Animal welfare issues are harder to ignore when cloning is undertaken for ends that seem frivolous or even, by some lights, inhumane” and from this people do not want the advancement of cloning(Fiester328-348). These actions prove that cloning is dangerous and should be stopped in order to save the animals that are being tortured for science. Cloning is not safe and the technology increasing towards this destruction of diversity needs to be stopped in order to help the…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Vaccines: Article Analysis

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is also unethical to let a human die in a trial of a new drug, but they are not comparable because one was intentional and the other accidental. The author is trying to use ethos and pathos to make you question the motives and the testing of vaccines. Perkins is also trying to make readers feel sympathy for those who suffer from vaccination testing, and use that sympathy to arise anger towards corporations. The…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics