The Benefits Of Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Animal testing is the use of animals in order to determine the safety of a newly invented product, mainly medicine, drug and cosmetics. Animals are the perfect models to test on since they are similar to humans in some ways and to a certain degree, they can predict the potential effects of a product. However, during the process of testing, animals are brutally neglected and are treated with almost no care. Such practices are inhumane; thus, in 1959 Russell and Burch published The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, which introduced the idea of the 3Rs principle — replacement, reduction, and refinement. This idea highlights the treatment that animals should receive in an experimental setting, and gradually it promoted the development …show more content…
According to Ferdowsian and Beck(2011), these animals often times do not receive sufficient amount of care, especially mice, rats and birds — species that are not valued as much as others. These species are to live low-quality lives that mentally and physically wears them down. However, over the past decades, national and international laws and guidelines have been created to improve living conditions and aim to provide basic protection for all animals. Such guidelines gradually encouraged people to find alternatives to animal testing. According to National Research Council(2007), in 1993, the NIH Reauthorization Act was passed to announce the need for alternative to toxicity testing. The NRC then stated that advances in systems biology, computational toxicology, epigenetic can enhance the research of certain products, as it steps closer to human origin. Finally, in 2008, the EPA, NIH, and Chemical Genomics Center followed NRC’s report and began developing new methods to toxicity testing. According to Johns Hopkins University, the EPA is still in the process of developing virtual human organs today. These researches on alternatives to animal testing will reduce, refine and replace the use of animal testing. Lastly, not only do animals gain a better quality life, the research would also be able to make products safer for humans to use and make …show more content…
They are subjected to testing that ranges from testing of new drugs to skin burning. According to New England Anti-Vivisection Society, these animals are severely neglected, and suffer just by merely existing. Some of these sufferings include: long-term isolation, electric shocks, withholding of food and water, genetic manipulation, immobilization of specific body parts and separation of infants from mother. In toxicity tests, animals receive the test substance everyday for up to two years without rest or recovery periods. Most of the animals die before the study ends; those that are lucky to survive are killed at the end of the study (with the exception of chimpanzees.) Moreover, animals don't only suffer from painful protocols, they also suffer from the accumulation of stress day by day living in poor conditions. Such laboratory conditions include crowded cages, lack of enrichment and bright lights — environments in which the animals cannot express their natural behaviors. Although, animals do not experience complex emotions and feelings like humans, they do share similar genetic and physiological traits with humans, and can express pain in a comparable way as humans. According to Gregory NG (2004), recent research discovered that mice are capable of experiencing pain and stress, and more importantly they are capable of expressing empathy, as they become even

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some are killed after they are done with their experiment. Ian Murnaghan mentions how some of the substance tested is never even used for anything useful. These products are tested on these animals for practice because it is a substance that wouldn’t be approved or won’t have public consumption. Another thing is that researchers keep thinking that animals and humans are the same in the skin. Animals can have a lot of reactions to these chemicals as well as humans because the skin is different.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admits that more than half of their experiments involving animals result in the trash because the difficulty of handling with animals are producing false information. Animal testing is unpredictable because the condition of each individual animal and species will vary. Clearly, experimenting with animals is unreasonable, dangerous, and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reprieve Animal Testing

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Often these animals either die during the testing process or suffer…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the FDA, 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal test, fail in humans(Klausner). It is time for scientist to divorce the idea of researching on animals and adapt to using methods like in vitro testing, computer models, and human tissues. Former U.S. national Institutes of Health director, Elias Zerhouni, said ,“We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the animals come to a testing laboratory, they are subjected to many things that will horrify you to imagine, but this paper will go into detail about what they endure so you can have a clear view of what happens to these animals. When these animals are taken to the laboratory for testing, they are commonly subjected to force feeding by tubes and needles, are forced to breathe a certain type of gas that can permanently alter them, and even be deprived of food and water for days while these experiments go on. Not only do they have to go through these things everyday, but they also undergo long periods of physical restraint, infliction or burns and other, sometimes serious wounds so that the corporations that are testing on them can examine the healing processes of these animals. Neck-breaking, decapitation, and infliction of pain, to study effects and medicine remedies are also very common. The draize eye test is also commonly used by cosmetic companies to evaluate irritation caused by shampoos, which involves rabbits being incapacitated with their eyelids held open by metal clamps.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While scientists often argue that animal testing is necessary for medical advancement, it can be considered inhumane and is not always necessary. Animals are used in research to determine the safety of products, advance in science, study disease, and develop forms of treatment. While there are alternatives for…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilizing living animal for the benefit of researcher and for the testing many types of products has been a matter of heated debate for for many of years now. Many people consider animals as pets or companions; whereas others look upon animals as only aids for researchers to study on. Despite peoples feeling towards animals, the reality is that animals across the country and around the world animals are being abused by cosmetics companies and research facilities. Even though humans sometimes benefit from successful animal testing, the pain, the torment, and deaths of the animals are not worth the potential benefits it may bring to humans. However, With all the new advancements in medical and scientific technology, the pain and suffering of…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animals are then forced fed, deprived of food and water, restrained physically for prolonged periods, and inflicted with burns, wounds and pain to test for healing process effects and remedies, and even killed through neck breaking or asphyxiation. Plenty of animal lives are wasted, considering all the tests failed not to mention other non- experimental factors that affect animals. There is a significant number of animal lives wasted for nothing. (16 Integral Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation."…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, scientists are coming up with new ideas to test these products. The scientist in Europe has come up with an artificial skin that reacts to products like human skin would (Alternatives to). They have also developed an artificial human eye that can be used to test eye irritation (Alternatives to). Computer modelling can help predict how our bodies will react to new substances by putting what we know about human cells and the new product and the computer will use mathematics to predict how we'll react to the new product (Alternatives to). Companies have been able to reduce animal testing by using human volunteers (Alternatives to).…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dating back to The Cruelty to Animals Act of 1876, mankind, especially the British, have been looking to protect laboratory animals and their rights (Lane-Petter 118). Modern protest to unethical animal testing has appeared in forms of laws, alternative suggestions, and improvements within the lab setting. For example, the UK passed the Animals Scientific Procedures Act of 1986, requiring extensive assessment in experiments that involve animals, then comparing the benefits of the project and the costs of the animal’s suffering (Festing and Wilkinson). Hopefully this act will eliminate animal testing that isn’t necessary for human medical development or survival. William S. Stokes, toxicity expert and zoologist suggests that practicing animal refinement (minimizing or eliminating pain in research animals) is a good way to enhance the well-being of laboratory animals.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like humans, animals feel pain, distress and torment when exhibited to chemical substances. Most of the time, these chemicals leave the animals: burnt, poisoned, starved and even lead to death, which is normally carried out through the inhumane manner of decapitation. Being a controversial and ethical topic, animal testing is often debated in a biased manner which makes it difficult, if not nearly impossible to find a concluding outcome. Those against animal testing argue on behalf of the welfare of animals, with others claiming that animal testing is vital for human benefit and…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine your family pet being enclosed in a small, cold, and dirty cage for days, weeks, or even months on end, only being taken out to be subjected to painful experiments without any anesthetic, as well as the possibility of developing life threatening diseases and injuries. Too many animals experience this on a regular basis around the globe - in fact, nearly 25 million animals will be used as test subjects annually. Animal testing is a horrible occurrence, one that brings suffering to even the smallest of creatures. Many people do not know the extremes of the effects of this practice, which are unnecessarily painful to animals, or that alternatives do exist, and that the results are not always accurate and time/cost effective. Experiments…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal testing is a reoccurring issue that circles society without any form of hesitation as to the consequences that underlay the blinding benefits. Animal experimenting was established during the 19th century. Many products such as medicine, hair care products and cosmetics are presented to the human population as safe to use because of animal testing. Though animal testing may be a controversial issue, many people feel animal testing is for the best. Hence, animal testing should be quickly addressed, for there is plenty of negative aspects that people choose to ignore on a day to day basis without juxtaposing the good and bad outcomes.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States alone, notably around 100 million animals die every year from lab testing, including larger animals like dogs and cats, along with smaller rodents. With animal testing on the rise, it is called out for being an unethical form of science. There are scientists and pro animal rights activists constantly on the search to reduce the number of animals involved in animal testing. They are trying to find alternatives to help layout a better blueprint for the science world. For instance, there are different types of lab testing that are used in an attempt to make animal testing more humane, as well as trying to pass laws that limit the use of animals in testing, scientists are stepping towards more animal free labs.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although animal experimentation has provided many benefits, there are alternatives to test toxic substances that may eliminate the cruel use of animals in research. The United States, along with many other countries, have turned to the use of animals in research labs to test human products for hazardous substances. According to the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, the United States uses about 12 million animals every year making it the biggest conductor of animal experimentation in the world. Scientists and many companies believe that testing their products on animals save humans from being harmed if the product is toxic. However, no matter what the benefits of animal experimentation are, the tests conducted on the animals are cruel.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays