The Benefits Of Abolishing The Senate

Improved Essays
The Senate is most likely the least appreciated and most unknown of our national political institutions. Its work attracts neither the interest of the media, the sympathy of the politicians, nor even the curiosity of public. How paradoxical is that, very few Canadians have an understanding of the history, role, and operations of the Senate, and yet everyone seems to have an opinion on the establishment. Many Canadians are asking themselves whether we might be better off without the Senate. Over the last several months, a talk about abolishing the Senate.Abolishing the Senate would be a terrible loss for Canada because the Senate does serve Canada well. Our first Prime minister, Sir John A. Macdonald, described the Senate as a place for “sober

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution Act of 1982 transferred the authority to amend the Constitution from Great Britain to Canada. To date, Quebec’s constitutional concerns have not been addressed to a great enough extent, according to the government or the residence, to formally pass consent on the 1982 Constitution. This is largely due to the distinctiveness of the society of Quebec originating from the largely French speaking population, the resilient cultural identity, as well as history, political, and social traditions, that are more or less not shared with the rest of Canada The question in concern is whether or not Canada’s Constitution should recognize the francophone population in Quebec as a ‘nation’ with characteristics and needs palpably different from those of other provinces in the Canadian federation. The problem has been tackled on a number of occasions but has yet to be resolved.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opinion piece, written by Senator Leo Housakos and published earlier this year in the Montreal Gazette, talked about the Senate’s attempt to improve the connection between this parliamentary institution and the Canadian citizens. As stated in the article, the Senate tried to deepen the connection between citizens and the institution by cultivating a better communication amongst them. According to Senator Housakos, transparency and accessibility go hand in hand with good governance, meaning the main purpose behind the Senate’s actions was their desire to be more open about their committee meetings and about the decisions that were taken. At the same time, Senator Housakos highlighted the Senate’s significance in the Canadian constitution…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Voices within Canada: Of hockey, Medicare and Canadian dreams” written by Stephen J. Toope questions what we want to be as Canadians as we approach our 150th birthday. Toope is the director of the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto, and is well qualified to question our country’s dreams as we approach an intimidatingly stormy future. To his audience of Canadians of all ages, Toope questions if current Canadian state is the best that can be done. Should hockey and Medicare be the defining features of a country that has sustained democratic rule for so long? He approaches the topic immediately with an emotional appeal to Canadians that motivates the audience to seek answers for what they believe in.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Electoral College: The System in Which the Loser Can Win Contrary to popular belief, when the public goes to the polls every fourth November to vote for the president, they are not actually voting for the president directly. In fact, a candidate could win the election even if only less than 22% of the population votes for them (Grey). Essentially, the vote of the people does not matter; it is the votes cast by the Electoral College that really determine who the next President of the United States will be. The Electoral College is a complex system that was created by the founding fathers and is, needless to say, flawed.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the Senate simply a waste of institutional space? Or is it an opportunity to make a change that is long overdue? An expense scandal involving several senators in December of 2012 sparked a political debate with regards to the future of the Senate of Canada. Most will agree that the Senate is a thoroughly flawed institution, however the pros and cons of each proposition should be weighed before any action is taken. After presenting each of the proposed options regarding what decision is to be made about the future of the Senate, I will argue in favor of major reform.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My government will not have a senate body. The senate includes a group of people that are appointed by the Governor-General on the advice of the Prime Minister. There are very few requirements needed to become a senator and they remain in this position until the age of seventy-five years. The reason my government won't have a senate is because it does not give fair opportunities to all the citizens as most are chosen by the PM based on his associations. Additionally, the senators are paid a high salary, but are not very accountable for their tasks because most of them are certain to remain in power till they retire.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism In Canada

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The move to actualize some type of electoral change is politically divisive. Since change stands to influence the quantity of seats each party wins in an election, the move to some system can seemingly profit at least one parties above others. Now and again, proposition have surfaced for changes to Canada's electoral system. More often than not, these include some variation of proportional representation, albeit some have contended for a particular ballot to guarantee that applicants chose have the support of a larger part of voters. At the government level, these have dependably been rejected.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the most recent election Donald Trump won, even though he got 380,000 fewer votes than Hillary Clinton. Most people who came out to vote on election day wanted Hillary Clinton to be the president, but still Trump ended up winning. How is this possible? What kind of system is this in which the person who gets more votes actually ends up losing? This scenario is only possible through the Electoral College.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College The Electoral College is a process made by the founding fathers in the Constitution as a compromise between the votes of the people of the United States, and the electors of the United States, where citizens vote to assist their electors who will hopefully vote as their state did. But the main question a majority of voting citizens asks, is the Electoral College fair, and is the Electoral college trouble for the United States as a country built on democracy? Even greater, is it time to dispose of the process? With that being said; yes the Electoral College is definitely ready to be disposed of due to the conflict it causes within the election process. To begin, the Electoral college should be eliminated because the…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As can be seen in the figure above, majority does not support getting rid of the Electoral college. 20 college students from UTSA were asked the survey question: “Do you think the Electoral College should be abolished? Please answer ‘yes,’ or ‘no.’” These students were asked this question from September 22nd-October 3rd, and were all asked the same exact question each time. 25% of students approved of abolishing the Electoral College.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College, a topic hotly debated today, is a ridiculously unfair system for choosing the next president. As the Founding Fathers were drafting the Constitution, they had to reach questionable compromises; one of them being the Electoral College. The Electoral College is an unfair system used to decide the nation’s next president. The people at the Constitutional Convention wrongfully feared that the people of the nation would vote for a bad candidate, and decided to delegate the task of choosing the president to certain people chosen by each state. The Electoral College should be abolished because it does not provide the basic Constitutional right of political equality, and because it makes it encourages hyper-partisan.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Chamber Abolition

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - Abolition: Complete abolition of the second chamber. Legislatures in countries such as Norway, Sweden and New Zealand are unicameral and therefore only have one chamber. This option would not only save money but it would also enable scrutiny to be carried out in different ways for example through a strengthened committee system. However, not only do numerous people debate against the loss of a British political tradition, many also claim that the House of Commons would in fact gain too much power without a second chamber, due to an important check on the government’s power being lost.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress: A Broken Government Throughout history, scholars, politicians, and the general public have been divided into two separate categories: those who agree that Congress is not a broken government and those who disagree with the former and argue that Congress is a broken government. While many factors point toward either argument, the most prominent answer is that Congress is, indeed, broken. The design of Congress, the founder’s intentions for Congress, and the Washington Establishment are among some of the many reasons that reveal plainly the brokenness of the government and allow others to see the dysfunction of Congress as well. Congress is designed to be made up of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays