In the course of recent decades, college sports increase in fame over the United States. Whether it be football or basketball, following the time when the century's turn, intercollegiate athletics acquire an overflow of income to their separate universities, and expand the college's name. Undergrad athletes are vital towards colleges as they are behind the athletic program's surplus in income (Nocera 1). These competitors are set to play which results in obtaining revenue to the university, yet players aren't remunerated with any money. Athletes are working for the schools and are supporting the school that appears to go unnoticed. This absence of pay is not seen anyplace else in the workforce and shouldn't be seen here. “John Calipari, head
…show more content…
Nonetheless, it’s injustice for labor intensive work to be done as an accessory to the education they're are supposed to be receiving, but aren't. The NCAA credits itself on “student first athlete second”, though the very-skilled players leave for the league early. “However, at some schools the road to the NCAA men’s basketball championship may require student-athletes to miss up to a quarter of all class days during their spring semester”(Edelman 1), consequently athletes fall behind. Additionally, in many cases of college basketball, players, usually freshmen, who come for one year and leave for the pros as a result of needing cash and need it at the earliest opportunity leaving a 19 year old to face the real world without a proper education. Thus, the importance of education itself is lost, only money is important, yet providing this money will enable teachers to engulf the knowledge that would’ve been missed in a classroom because going pro early wouldn’t be priority. “According to research , a university’s primary objective is to provide its students with a quality education that prepares them to function in the world as opposed to in college”(Rush 1). The NCAA is by all accounts misleading in its motto when it doesn't pay its competitors, in light of the fact …show more content…
Negatively affecting the student morally, and create more problems usually resulting in punishment. Now some athletes are in college for the sole reason of obtaining a preeminent level of training for pro league according to coaches (Sharp 1). Logistically, boosting on many occasions has taken a negative toll on athletes, as portrayed in many instances. Prime example, Reggie Bush, the running back for the “University of Southern California from 2003-2005 Bush was paid by boosters to attend USC, which violated NCAA rules as a result he was warranted to return his Heisman trophy”(Sharp 2). It was the lack of financial funding that allowed Bush to succumb to break the rules and accepting money from a booster which forever tainted his reputation (Sharp 2). Colleges claim they want the best for their students and provide a path to get achieve that goal, yet they in a sense encourage boosting, by not paying compensation to players. Had Reggie Bush, possessing a full ride scholarship, had the sufficient funding provided by the scholarship; what would be the apparent need for accepting boosting money? Which brings me to the conclusion that players absolutely need compensation to ensure incentive to graduate , which the primary goal of a college since not all can “go pro” so to say, and to respectively appreciate the players for the contribution to
Nonetheless, it’s injustice for labor intensive work to be done as an accessory to the education they're are supposed to be receiving, but aren't. The NCAA credits itself on “student first athlete second”, though the very-skilled players leave for the league early. “However, at some schools the road to the NCAA men’s basketball championship may require student-athletes to miss up to a quarter of all class days during their spring semester”(Edelman 1), consequently athletes fall behind. Additionally, in many cases of college basketball, players, usually freshmen, who come for one year and leave for the pros as a result of needing cash and need it at the earliest opportunity leaving a 19 year old to face the real world without a proper education. Thus, the importance of education itself is lost, only money is important, yet providing this money will enable teachers to engulf the knowledge that would’ve been missed in a classroom because going pro early wouldn’t be priority. “According to research , a university’s primary objective is to provide its students with a quality education that prepares them to function in the world as opposed to in college”(Rush 1). The NCAA is by all accounts misleading in its motto when it doesn't pay its competitors, in light of the fact …show more content…
Negatively affecting the student morally, and create more problems usually resulting in punishment. Now some athletes are in college for the sole reason of obtaining a preeminent level of training for pro league according to coaches (Sharp 1). Logistically, boosting on many occasions has taken a negative toll on athletes, as portrayed in many instances. Prime example, Reggie Bush, the running back for the “University of Southern California from 2003-2005 Bush was paid by boosters to attend USC, which violated NCAA rules as a result he was warranted to return his Heisman trophy”(Sharp 2). It was the lack of financial funding that allowed Bush to succumb to break the rules and accepting money from a booster which forever tainted his reputation (Sharp 2). Colleges claim they want the best for their students and provide a path to get achieve that goal, yet they in a sense encourage boosting, by not paying compensation to players. Had Reggie Bush, possessing a full ride scholarship, had the sufficient funding provided by the scholarship; what would be the apparent need for accepting boosting money? Which brings me to the conclusion that players absolutely need compensation to ensure incentive to graduate , which the primary goal of a college since not all can “go pro” so to say, and to respectively appreciate the players for the contribution to