This cannot be achieved by oppression of other, groups because it acts in complete disconnection with the true meaning of socialism. By the end of the film the protagonist seems to come to the realization that what in the beginning he saw as conflicting deity, that did not align with his interpretation of God was actually almost identical to his personal view of the world. Daniel claims to be anti-samite when in reality he is more aligning with their values and beliefs than any other group. In the film there is an expression that presents itself as both a challenge and a continuation of Judaism, “maybe we are all Jew’s, it doesn’t matter” (Bean, "The believer"). That expression is relevant throughout this essay, many of Daniel’s doctrines challenge Judaism and in doing so they also present continuation to such. The fact of the matter is that it doesn’t matter. There will almost always be a common ground for different doctrines that should in the very least allow us to
This cannot be achieved by oppression of other, groups because it acts in complete disconnection with the true meaning of socialism. By the end of the film the protagonist seems to come to the realization that what in the beginning he saw as conflicting deity, that did not align with his interpretation of God was actually almost identical to his personal view of the world. Daniel claims to be anti-samite when in reality he is more aligning with their values and beliefs than any other group. In the film there is an expression that presents itself as both a challenge and a continuation of Judaism, “maybe we are all Jew’s, it doesn’t matter” (Bean, "The believer"). That expression is relevant throughout this essay, many of Daniel’s doctrines challenge Judaism and in doing so they also present continuation to such. The fact of the matter is that it doesn’t matter. There will almost always be a common ground for different doctrines that should in the very least allow us to