The Beliefs Of John Locke And Plato's Private Property

Improved Essays
Plato’s thoughts on private property are contradictory because he believes that property should be both private and public at the same time. Plato believes that all people should have some private property, but “no one will possess any private property except for what’s entirely necessary” (Republic, 416e). Plato recognizes that people should have some form of private property in the form of housing because everyone in the perfect city will have a home, but that the amount of private property afforded to each resident, be limited to what’s necessary for the individual to have a positive impact on the city as a whole. The city will provide the private property for its residents. However, Plato appears to contradict himself when he stipulates …show more content…
Private property is established when someone has “Mixed his labor with, and joined to it, something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property” (Second Treatise, 288). People gain private property by utilizing that property for their own benefit. Furthermore, Locke believes the only way that people separate from their natural freedoms, and join “civil society is by agreeing with other men to join and unite into a community, for their comfortable, safe, and peaceable living one amongst another, in a secure enjoyment of their properties” (Second Treatise, 331). Locke is not only concerned with the ownership of property, but also in the quality of living that people have. While the only reason that people leave the state of nature is to ensure the protection of their private property, they are also ensuring a happier life. This links with Aristotle as he was also concerned with the happiness within society. In contrast with Plato and Hobbes, Locke does not believe that the government allocates land to the …show more content…
Rousseau believes that “every man by nature has a right to everything he need” (The Social Contract, 168). One thing that every man needs is property. However, “The right of first occupant… does not become a true right until after the establishment of the right of property” (The Social Contract, 168). People do not have a right to a piece of land until the right to own land has been erected, and this right must be established by the sovereign. Furthermore, when claiming land, there are rules that people must adhere to. The first rule is that the ““Land may not already be occupied by anyone” (The Social Contract, 168). This means that an invading force cannot take land away from the inhabitants who are already there. In addition, land cannot be claimed through ceremonial processes such as purchasing of land. Instead, “One is to take possession of [land]... by working and cultivating it” (The Social Contract, 168). Land can only be claimed through the utilization of resources within the land. Rousseau also believes in limiting how much land someone can have because “No one may occupy more than the amount needed to subsist” (The Social Contract, 168). Just like Hobbes and Plato, Rousseau believes in limiting how much land any individual can own to the amount of land needed to provide for oneself and one’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Violence as seen in many communities is a very debated topic. The question most discussed tends to be when it’s okay to use violence against another individual. In terms of John Locke, in the absence of government in a civic society one has every right to use violence as self defense to protect their life, liberty and estates; any aggression towards another person is a challenge of the victims’ freedom whether there be a common judge or not. Even in a state of nature, rights still exist and take president since everyone is free, equal and has a right to private property. In a state of nature when self interest, bias and revenge are present each can lead to a state of war.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The idea of freedom in Jean Jacque Rousseau’s The Social Contract (1762) is present throughout the book and Rousseau’s own, personal understanding of freedom underpins his argument for his ideal state. In this essay I will argue that individual citizens aren’t truly free in every sense in Rousseau’s state as the sovereign has complete dominion over public matters and due to the sovereign explicitly being composed of every citizen, this could lead to nearly every problem being deemed within the public realm. Furthermore, one cannot be individually free, in my opinion, when one cannot voice dissent against the prevailing convention of society, as is the case in Rousseau’s state. To argue this thesis effectively I will explore what freedom means…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Natural Rights Vs Feminism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An important topic is being discussed and it concerns the article of natural rights and feminism. For instance, “natural rights is defined as rights such as life, liberty, and property, with which an individual is born” (Roots of Wisdom Pg. 354). In addition, feminism is defined as the advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to their male counterpart. Indeed, there are many opinions about these topics. However, the concept of natural rights and feminism have been prevalent throughout history.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spencer Escue Coach Quinn European History November 24, 2015 The Ideas of John Locke A philosopher is someone who is engaged or learned in philosophy. So who were some of the greatest philosophers?…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke’s social contract is similar to the Preamble in the sense that both require the government to listen to the people and be subject to its laws. As well as this , the rulers are entrusted to uphold the law and protect the life, liberty, and property of its citizens. This theory can be found in another line from the Preamble, “that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness”. The vision of individualism within the structure of the law of nature is integrated heavily within Locke’s book Two Treatises of Government as well as in the Declaration of…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The “Founding Fathers” of the United States would have answers to today’s most controversial issues, whether those are cases of police brutality in Baltimore or questions on the rights of same-sex couples through the nation. The era which brought into being the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is often referred to as the "New Enlightenment" during this era our Founding Fathers turn to the great works of Enlightenment philosophy when the time came to construct a new government. This new government would put man’s right as the top priority and working together to prohibit the rule of tyrannical leaders such as King George III of England. Enlightenment thinkers such as Montesquieu, Beccaria, and Locke ideas on the form and…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebellion Dbq

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He said that God gave every man natural rights. These rights could not be taken away for any reason by anyone, even if that someone was royalty or an institution the royalty had created. Locke believed that anyone who worked in the “commons” (essentially anywhere…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although complicated tasks were divided among workers, the workers become more dependent on one another. The division of labor among individuals allowed them to transform land into property, however an unequal distribution of resources emerged as not all individuals held the same talents and abilities as one another. Therefore, the use of resources were unequal since some individuals could benefit by being naturally gifted at their craft while others could find it difficult to survive in a nonsufficient market depending the needs of that community. The institution of property, according to Rousseau, is what adds to the political and social inequalities. It is important to note that Rousseau does not necessarily believe that property is the cause of these inequalities rather he points to the inequality of property as the main driven force behind…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Enlightenment was a time when people developed new ideas about human rights, human existence, and the level of control the people should have over their futures and government. Natural rights, the Social Contract, and Republicanism were some of the many ideas from this period of time. John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, William Blackstone, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were some of the few well-known philosophers during this time. John Locke and Jean-Jacques were the philosophers that influenced American government the most. They created multiple ideas that have helped shape society to this day.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau explains how a reset button is needed for politics at his time because the natural state of man has been compromised by the self-indulgence and dependent nature of politics. After man had strayed from the set of rules laid down by god/nature he was no longer self-sufficient and free but was enslaved by manmade laws that enforced inequality. Rousseau criticizes the idea of property “The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, bethought himself of saying 'this is mine ', and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society” (Rousseau). In this statement Rousseau claims that the idea of property is one of the origins of inequality, as man claimed the land as his own and began exploiting nature. Rousseau’s call for a reset button on political ethics is at a disagreement with Machiavelli’s idea, where Machiavelli urges the Prince to recognize and utilize the lapses in human nature.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to The Social Contract, once people can no longer survive in a primitive state, they willingly enter the social contract, and lose their animalistic ways. According to Rousseau, “Man loses by the social contract his natural liberty, and an unlimited right to all that tempts him, and which he can obtain; in return he acquires civil liberty, and proprietorship of all he possesses… In addition we might add to the other acquisitions of the civil state that of moral liberty, which alone renders a man master of himself; for it is slavery to be under the impulse of mere appetite, and freedom to obey a law in which we prescribe for ourselves” (Rousseau, 79-80). Unlike Locke, Rousseau believed that…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both philosophers, Lock and Aristotle, have written a variety of novels that concretely describes who they believe should rule. In the novel “The Politics of Aristotle”, Aristotle highlights the impact and influence that regimes have on our society. He thoroughly describes a regime as, “The way a city is arranged both with respect to its other offices and, above all, with respect to the office that has control over all the rest” (Aristotle 87). He goes on to specifying three correct regimes Kingship, aristocracy, and polity each on details a good way to rule. Although each one creates fair opportunities for the greater good, Aristotle deeply defines how each one creates some sort of unjust amongst the community.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays