Reasons For The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Improved Essays
The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not nearly as black and white and some people make them out to be. In war, who is to decide who the good guys and the bad guys are? There were so many factors ands risks that President Truman had to weigh in when making this crucial decision. In the end, he decided that it would be most beneficial to his country to bomb two military and industrial centers in Japan. President Truman 's decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justifiable because the United States was forced to respond to the attacks on Pearl Harbor, the alternative of invading Japan would have resulted in higher death tolls from both sides, the use of brutal force such as an atomic bomb was the only way Japan …show more content…
The first plane of the attack was identified by the Americans as an American aircraft; therefore, the Americans were caught completely off guard when the attack first began (Harris). The Japanese had the upper hand in this attack, and left the Americans defenseless and panicked. This situation draws similarities to the United States ' bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since the Japanese caught the Americans off guard, it was only logically fair that the Americans would catch the Japanese off guard with the bombs. Just as the American Navy and citizens were innocently attacked, so too were the Japanese people. In a war, an attack on a country 's home does not go unnoticed and calls for a response by that …show more content…
According to an article about the pros and cons of dropping the atomic bombs, the government claimed that one reason for dropping the bombs was to instill fear into the Japanese people. The United States ' possession and usage of the bombs demonstrated their strength to not only the Japanese but also the rest of the world. A counterargument to the bombs is that great tension was created between Japan and the United States ("Pros and Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb"). The United States was able to scare the Japanese, thus forcing them to surrender. Although a strong tension was created between the two countries, it would not have been much different had the Americans invaded Japan and killed thousands of their people in that fashion. On top of all of that, the United States would have lost soldiers as well. Either way, the Japanese would not have stopped fighting until they were scared and battered by the bombs. The war had already been going on too long for the United States ' liking, so they did not like the idea of an invasion because of the amount of time it would

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The decision to use the atomic bomb was partially a show-off of American strength over its enemies. The impact of the bombing on human beings and the environment is quite enormous and it is felt for many generations after the war. Those in favor of the bomb argued that dropping the bomb is better than invading Japan because it will save lives. This I do not agree with,…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By 1945, the Japanese Imperial Navy and air force were on the verge of collapse and by July, American warplanes had destroyed nearly a quarter of all the houses in Japan (“Was Hiroshima necessary?”). Because the United States was aware of the suffering the Japanese were going through, the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was overkill, and therefore, was…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the only times that atomic weapons have been used. To access whether the attacks were justified we need to consider at least two eyewitness accounts; which are available through the access to the media more precisely a particular issue of the New Yorker which had John Hersey’s “Hiroshima” taking up the entire magazine. The article only covers the bombing of Hiroshima, but since the bombing of Nagasaki was a plutonium bomb and more power we can assume that the aftermath of it was worse than the aftermath of Hiroshima. There were many victims of the unprecedented atomic attack by the United States against the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Yet, I only need to use two of the four victims in John Hersey’s article "Hiroshima.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The league of Nations prevented any deliberate bombing on civilians but America was not a part of the League of Nations so what they did wasn’t technically illegal. America had the technology and had been working on it for years so why shouldn’t they be allowed to use it. America had been continuously bombing Japan destroying their resources but still Japan wouldn’t surrender so America thought a very powerful atomic bomb would do the trick. America had planned for a Japan mainland invasion on November but they dropped the bomb earlier to see if they could prevent the predicted death of millions from both sides.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    dropped the atom bombs because they wanted to test the power of the atomic bomb and that Hiroshima was not firebombed because America had reserved it as a test site, but that is incorrect. One reason is that the U.S. had already tested an atom bomb and knew of its tremendous power. Another prominent reason is that the U.S. felt that the atomic bomb was the only way to stop the laborious and difficult in the Pacific. This was true because the fighting in the Pacific consisted of Japanese soldiers using kamikazes to damage Allied Navy forces.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America is a very advanced country, but for 1945 the atomic bomb was considered a new, rare, and powerful weapon. They began to develop Little Boy before War World 2 began, but as ideas changed two models were made. The first one, made of uranium and dropped in Hiroshima, was called Little Boy. This was a sign to them that the war would be ending soon. In order to secure the end of the war they dropped another bomb made of plutonium in Nagasaki.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The primary bomb, dropped on the city of Hiroshima on August 6 1945, brought about a loss of life of around 135,000. The second, which hit Nagasaki on August 9, killed no less than 50,000 individuals. Many people died from the atomic bomb released by the United States of America. I feel as if the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan was justified.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were several Wars having to include weapons and force against each other. However, there were certain weapons that people were biased to either use or not use. In the War against Japan, the US was debating to drop the atomic bomb. There are three main arguments why they should and three why they shouldn’t. Japan was an enemy to the United States at one point.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Boom! Crash! Those were the sounds coming from the bombings of World War II. Was it a good idea to bomb Japan for what they had done to us? The answer remains uncertain, but in my opinion, it was the best choice.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After several years of fighting , it was no surprise that each nation was feeling the toll of the conflict, which is why the U.S. wanted to put an end to it. As stated by Taketo Suzuki in ‘Why Was the A-Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima’ “One reason for the atomic bombings given by the United States was to hasten the end of the war.” When dealing with foreign conflict it’s safe to say that a government’s priority should be protecting the lives of their citizens. Continuing to send troops would have resulted in more casualties on the American side, which is why their choice to drop Hiroshima and Nagasaki is deemed admissible, given that the Japanese had already claimed thousands of American souls during WWII, and preventing any more was in the United States best interest. All of the bloodshed from the atomic missiles could have been avoided if Japan had agreed to the allies terms of surrender.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thousands of people, civilians and soldiers alike, were murdered. Both cities were decimated, and Japan’s economy was suffering greatly. However, the whole situation could have been avoided. Japan was already on the brink of surrendering when the U.S. dropped the bomb. If the attack would’ve consisted of regular bombs, the actions of the Japanese would have been similar, but there would have been fewer casualties and a lower chance of future world destruction.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    could have handled the matter in a less brutal way. The U.S. committed acts of murder more than the act of war. The bomb could have been as destructive as the bomb used on the attack of Pearl Harbor. The bombing may have been more justified if the bomb had been dropped in a less populated area, showing the japanese what america was capable of. Many different things could have been done to Japan that would have had a less negative long-term effects.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, Harry S. Truman, President of the U.S, ordered the dropping of the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The first bomb was dropped on August 6th, 1945 on Hiroshima which resulted in a death toll of around 135,000. The second bomb hit Nagasaki on August 9th, 1945 which killed at least 50,000 people. But the question is, was the U.S justified in dropping the Atomic Bombs? The U.S was justified in dropping the Atomic Bombs for numerous reasons,being that Imperial Japan initiated a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor (December 7th, 1941), Imperial Japan kidnapped, tortured, and killed U.S Prisoners of War (P.O.W), and even after all this the U.S gave Japan the chance to surrender before the bombings (The Potsdam Declaration)…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On August 6, 1945 – the day of the Hiroshima bombing – President Harry Truman announced to the United States why the bomb had been dropped: It was “to spare the Japanese people from utter destruction that the ultimatum of July 26 was issued at Potsdam” (Harry Truman). Though this is what President Truman directly said to his citizens, this was not the main reason for dropping the bomb. The U.S. needed Japan to surrender as fast as possible so they could drive Japan back to their own land. The United States needed to establish dominance over Japan. This would also prove America’s power and swift execution to the Soviet Union.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    President Harry Truman informed the world that a bomb had been dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. Certainly the power of both bombs was understood to be devastating and some deemed it to be an unnecessary act including President Truman who stated, “it was the most terrible thing ever discovered,” (Grant 24). The decision to use this new weapon was not an easy decision according to Truman who was indecisive about dropping them. Knowing that both bombs would work, his decision was made to end the war quickly and with as few American casualties as possible. The main purpose of bombing the Japanese was to win the war at the lowest possible cost, and this meant that Truman wasn’t just looking for any reason to use the bomb, but to end the war…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays