Are Atomic Bombs Necessary

Improved Essays
In 1945, the United States government launched two atomic bombs. These bombs landed on two different Japanese cities in the span of a week. The United States saw the atomic bombs as an opportunity to get out of the war with Japan. Many atomic bomb supporters claim that the US were only acting to defend their own people. Regardless, the bombs weren’t a necessary or a humane solution. Japan was already face to face with surrender. Most of the world had agreed upon disallowing the use of WMDs in war, this was in attempts to prevent civilian casualties. Needless to say, the bombings were a selfish, disgusting, inhumane war crime. They caused many innocent people to suffer life altering injury or death.

The bombings were a pointless acts of aggression.
…show more content…
People in the wake of the bombs were killed or severely injured both mentally and physically. Entire families and neighborhoods of Japanese civilians were whipped out by the atomic bombs. The bombs weren 't necessary, because it is never necessary to take the lives of innocent people. Anyone with a heart can see that it is inherently evil, soulless, and wrong to take the lives of so many women, children, elderly, and men. The few survivors faced radiation sickness, starvation, and crippling mutations. Not to mention the emotional damages of seeing the places and people they grew up knowing and loving mutilated to a pulp. The bombings also affected the future generations, as many babies were born with mutations and fatal illnesses. The United States unknowingly crippled the country of Japan. As well as the future of the civilization as the fallout mutated and caused diseases to the future Japanese generations. Even the co-pilot on the Enola Gay mission over Hiroshima felt remorse for the bombing. He wrote in his log, “My god, what have we done?”. This shows that the reaction happened immediately and many US citizens and officers realized the true effects of the bombs. Also it shows how a person who works in war can show remorse for the people in which he had fought against. It is apparent that no one deserves to be atomically bombed and that atomic bombs …show more content…
As well as the use of what could be considered as weapons of mass destruction. The League of Nations issued a unanimous resolution that stated, “Any attack on legitimate military objectives must be carried out in such a way that civilian populations in the neighborhood are not bombed in negligence.” Even though the League of Nations had dissolved by 1945, many of the international laws produced through it still were followed and accepted by the nations that were at once involved in the League. Thus, it was inherently illegal for the US to bomb Japan and put the civilian population of Japan in the wake of their destruction. The League of Nations also banned the use of WMDs, “the use of chemical or bacterial methods in the conduct of war is contrary to international law.” Although the law doesn’t say anything against nuclear warfare, it is implied because it has similar and even more devastating reaction. Again this shows how the atomic bomb was against international law. So not only unnecessary but also an offense deserving of high punishment for the nation that is at fault. Additionally, the bomb wasn’t ever made to be an offensive weapon. It was initially created to deter Germany. The use of the bomb directly went against the will of its creators therefore, should never been allowed to have been dropped upon Japan. Disgustingly enough, we can contribute some of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, world war two was not a disagreement to cause destruction towards the countries. The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America’s desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered. In addition, the USA were acting against the Japanese in…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan The decision President Truman had to make regarding dropping a fission bomb onto Japanese cities in order to end the war would have been too hard for most of us to handle. America was weary after 4 years of almost total war with Germany, Italy, and Japan and the war needed to end. At this point, Japan was alone and dragging its feet after many losses. From the history we know, the decision was justified as it ended a devastating war with no end in sight and it saved more lives than were lost.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ww2 Ethical Dilemmas

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is morality? Surely it can’t be taking men, women, and children to a camp because you don’t like the color of their skin, their religion, or even what people from their home country have done. Sure, the Japanese bombed us first. But does that make it right to bomb them back? Twice at that.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Historical Turning Point

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After the dropping of the bombs and the initial blasts, there would be other, equally painful effects on the Japanese people. Several tens of thousands in Japan would die post-explosion due to radiation sickness and other deadly diseases that were caused as a part of intense exposure to heat and radiation. I might mention that one of these deadly diseases that had a terrible impact in this instance, and whose echo is still heard today, was some related cancers. It struck fear, pain, and other suffering into the Japanese people as non-combatants, in addition to the combatants of the war were killed as result of these…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    usage of the atomic bombs was militarily unnecessary and immoral. Furthermore, it lead to the extensive loss of civilian life, therefore making these bombings justifiable only to a lesser extent. However, supporters of the bombings generally are of the opinion that they were instrumental in the Japanese surrender. These supporters also believe that the bombings were beneficial in preventing casualties on both sides, and helped in protecting America from further attacks, especially by Japan. Even before the atomic bombs were dropped, Japan’s surrender was imminent (Source B, Extract 1).…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Japan did not surrender after the first bomb, but a day after the second bomb dropped Japan surrendered. A lot of conflict and controversy circles around if the U.S. should or should not have dropped the atomic bomb. Dropping the atomic bomb helped Americans in many ways and put an end to the Second World War. By dropping the bombs, the U.S. knew it would end the war quickly and bring American families back together. Also, it saved…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, “even after the use of the atomic bombs, the Japanese military still fought on” (Wilson Miscamble, 2014). The atomic bombs helped Emperor Hirohito realise the futility of trying to defend the home islands. Furthermore, all other viable scenarios, such as an invasion, would have resulted in much higher casualties for both the allies and Japan. If such an invasion was to occur, it “would cost 250,000 American lives” (Jason Hook, 2002). Moreover, the prisoners of war would also have been executed, as Japanese officials would have ordered it if they had been invaded.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Japanese already established their willingness to fight tooth and nail for Japan and the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa suggesting a substantial amount of loss of life and property for an invasion of Japan homeland. The atomic bombs were possibly the only alterative to what an invasion would hold, as author Bernstein defines with America’s potential Invasion of Japan on the horizon, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, details an estimation of over 250,000 American casualties and up to a million men for an invasion of Japan (Bernstein, 550). With America’s estimations and the expected outcomes of invasion of Japan, suggesting a bloodbath “an all-out fight to the death” between the Japanese population and American soldiers, The atomic bombs had to be dropped, as not dropping the atomic bombs the invasion of Japan would have most likely preceded instead, thus prolonging the war, causing substantial amounts of casualties and costing a great amount of funds and resources to overtsee the operation. The atomic bombs provided an alternative to risking anymore American lives. Similarly, by July 1945, the Japanese military continued refuse surrender.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    You have heard two reasons why dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was not justified and unnecessary. But perhaps the most compelling reasons why dropping the bomb was not justified is that the United States was weeks or months away from Japan surrendering and the war ending before dropping the bombs and killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people. As you will hear from General Mitsuru Ushijima, Japan was already losing the war. The country was surrounded by US troops, Americans controlled Japanese airspace and waterways, and US casualties in military battles were low compared to Japanese. The US commanders knew that Japan was close to surrendering as Germany had already surrendered, and Russia, another powerful military force, was…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S government stated that the reasoning for choosing Hiroshima and Nagasaki was due to them being classified as legitimate military targets, yet in truth there were little military personnel within both cities. Even though Hiroshima was home to the Japanese Second Army HQ only about 10,000 of the estimated 17,000 deaths were military servicemen, in Nagasaki there were even less, an approximate 150 military members perished out of the 80,000 total casualties that come out to be 95% civilian casualties (The Truth About the Bombing). The worst has yet to come, when the bomb detonated the “heart of the explosion reached a temperature of several million degrees centigrade” all people within a half a mile radius were killed instantaneously, around 63% of the buildings, and 92% of all structures within Hiroshima were annihilated (The Truth About the Bombing). Those who were not killed the first day, yet still in the blast radius, died shortly after from severe burns, those who were only in the radiation radius died weeks to month to years after from too much radiation, and women who were pregnant gave birth to still borns, or children with serious birth defects (The Truth About the Bombing). The truth is, is that the bombs are not a one and done type thing it is a long drawn out process that people decades later are still affected by.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As if the first bomb was not bad enough, another bomb was dropped on another Japanese city. The development of the atomic bombs cost America billions of dollars. Many thought there were could have been different ways to get back at Japan other than spending…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays