The Atomic Bomb: Necessary Or Justified?

Improved Essays
The fact that the United States decided to drop an atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan shocked many people, including U.S. citizens and the Japanese. The U.S. used a brutal force choosing the atomic bomb, as proven by the thousands of deaths caused. The U.S. knew the extent of damage it was causing by deploying the bomb, and some people still question the motives for such a ruthless choice of weaponry. The atomic bomb, however destructive and questionable, seemed to be the only sure way of ensuring “unconditional surrender.” The U.S. took matters into its own hands to ensure an end to war on its own terms. The atomic bomb was, in fact, “a clear step designated to force Japan’s unconditional surrender;” however, this statement fails …show more content…
The U.S. had much regret when coming out of WWI and was far from ready to engage in yet another war. The U.S. sat back comfortably and maintained a position of neutrality, even while sending supplies to the British military. Not until the U.S. felt the effects of war on a personal level during the attack on Pearl Harbor, did the U.S. even decide to enter WWII. If the U.S. wanted to maintain its position as a rising power, it had to respond to such an attack. At the same time, one must remember that the formation of a United Nations was in the works. In order to accommodate such a large agreement, the U.S. had to compromise and side with nations, particularly the Soviet Union, that it did not necessarily agree with, in order to preserve power. The desire to put a complete stop to Japan’s attacks as well as to maintain a stance of power within the Alliance were both important goals the U.S. had to keep in mind when making the decision to drop the atomic …show more content…
From the beginning of the development of the atomic bomb, the world knew that it would be an unstoppable weapon. It would do nothing short of destroying the indestructible and forcing the unstoppable to stop. Critics argue that the surrender of Japan was already on the way, considering that there had already been multiple debilitating blows to the nation. Thousands of people had already been killed and industries already laid bare. These situations would’ve already made it difficult for the Japanese to continue “to carry on a large-scale war.” (Doc B) The U.S., however, did not just want to make it difficult for the Japanese to continue, but wanted to guarantee a defeat against the nation that violated them the most. Threats of destruction did not cause the Japanese to surrender, so anything short of the atomic bomb may not have worked to cause them to surrender. While the U.S. directed the force at Japan, the U.S. also had in mind the desire to show the entire world the force that it had within its grasp. The U.S. wanted to be seen as a superpower and the atomic bomb was undeniably a power play using such a mighty

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the aftermath of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor the United States retaliated on August 6, 1945, at 8:15 a.m. the crew of the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima. The bomb detonated 2,000 feet above the center of Hiroshima, destroying 60% of the city and killing an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 people immediately. Due to amount of civilian deaths this led to, we often ask ourselves if the bombings over these Japanese cities were necessary. To debate wether the bombing was necessary we should pay attention to Japans decision to continue to not surrender after the first bombing. If a country is that proud and resilient for them to still refuse to surrender after one nuclear bombing killing between 70,000 to 100,000…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1945, the United States made a fateful decision: to drop not just one, but two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. These decisions would spur debate amongst historians for the next sixty-nine years and will most likely continue to do so for some time. One historian, J. Samuel Walker, wrote a book on the topic entitled Prompt & Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan. This publication examines the decision-making process followed when the US government was contemplating dropping the atomic bomb on Japan. This book focuses especially on the new President Truman who was just coming into his presidency in 1945.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima (Aug. 6) and Nagasaki (Aug. 9) totaled to almost 200,000 Japanese casualties (Document A). President Harry Truman decided to use this horrific weapon considered to be immoral despite other options to force Japan to surrender, ending the second world war. On June 6th, 1945, the Japanese War Council stated, “we shall -- thanks to the advantages of our terrain and the unity of our nation, prosecute the war until the bitter end” (Document C). Japan had no intentions to surrender until absolutely necessary. This statement is supported through when Japan surrendered.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated previously, the United States’ objective was to obliterate Japan with their military power in order to make them surrender from the war, “Only the complete destruction of her military power could open way to lasting peace” (Document #3). At this point in the war, Japan was already in a devastated state due to the wrath of incendiary bomb raids and shortages in food. To push them over the edge into “waving the white flag”, the atomic bombs were necessary so that the Japanese could not be able to continue their fight and finally put an end to the entire war. Therefore, resulting in a win for the…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Dropping the atomic bomb was the only correct decision for the United States because of casualties being less than what they would have if America had invaded, the brutality of Japanese towards the American POW, and the importance of intimidating Stalin. By dropping the Atomic bomb, the United States rightfully saved thousands of potential lives. After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the amount of Japanese lives lost totaled to 105,000. (Doc E)…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Viewpoint 30A “The United States Should Not Drop the Atomic Bomb on Japan.” The Franck Committee, 1945. Dropping a nuclear bomb on Japan would initiate grim political and economic problems in the future of the United States. Without international control of nuclear weapons, a nuclear armaments race is ensured. The Franck Committee states, “...A race for nuclear armaments is certain to ensue following the first revelation of our possession of nuclear weapons to the world” (239).…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Time and time again the United States of America has proven itself to be a lethal force in war, this is both the nation’s greatest wartime strength and its weakness. When the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing thousands of Japanese and instituting the conclusion of conflict in the Pacific Theatre of WWII, it was proven to the world how ruthlessly violent the nation truly is. The United States’ use of the atomic bomb was not necessary primarily as it caused massive civilian causalities. Additionally, the decision to drop the bombs was not properly justified, as Japan at the time was already very crippled and the Axis powers were on the brink of losing the war. Unequivocally, the dropping…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped bombs killing thousands of people on Japan, which effectively ended the Second World War. The bombings against Japan were necessary because they had warnings and a chance to surrender, things could have ended up worse, and most of all it protected the lives of the US. Japan didn’t have a direct warning that the US was going to bomb them, but there was a statement encouraging Japan to surrender while the bomb was still being talked about. Japan didn’t surrender. For months we dropped more than 63 million leaflets across Japan, warning them of bombings.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. made a good decision when it decided that it wanted to use the atomic bomb. Japan was just not going to give up. Although it is admirable how hard they fought and how far they were willing to go they should’ve known when it was just time to stop. It had been a long war and it was just time for it to end. The U.S. had given Japan a chance to go for unconditional surrender but Japan refused.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United State’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War ll is one of the most arguable controversies in American history due to the questionable reasoning behind its use, and the horrific effects it had on Japanese citizens. At the time of the bombing it was actually supported by a vast majority of the American public. During 1945, the decision to use the bomb was not only supported but encouraged. In August of 1945 opinion polls given to the American public showed 85% of Americans supported bombing Japan (Hadley, 21). On the contrary, historians such as Gar Alperovitz have argued Truman used the bomb merely to gain political status and power over the Soviets.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teetering to Surrender: A Critical Analysis of “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration” Individuals see “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration,” by Sadao Asada, as tedious and boring. Including names of different articles and historians can seem useless and insignificant, however I challenge you to see the strengths within this piece. Asada’s academic article puts entertainment and emotional appeal aside to discuss a different side of the Hiroshima bombing then previously emphasized, due to new information. As a result, Asada’s factual article presents a convincing case: the atomic bombs and Russian pressure were both necessary for Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics