There is a major and distinct difference between being an overseer and a leader. Both are based on supremacy, but an overseer demand obsequious behavior while a leader earn trust through understanding others. During Tsar Nicholas II reign; he was known for being the last Romanov leaders. Tsar’s government held totally power, along with the inability to rule over Russia. Tsar was dethroned and later executed with his family for his poor judgement and Russia being in chaos. Industrialism did not reach Russia until the late 19th century; but majority of Russia was still not industrialized. As other nations expanded and became more advanced; Russian trailed behind. Many people were still pleasant ruled over by nobility. Nicholas II was against
…show more content…
During the pre revolutionary Russian revolution was incompetent; Nicholas could not manage Russia’s vast population and stop anyone who oppose or try to help him. He was always suspicious of anyone that might pose a threat to his sovereignty. Additionally, his advisors and top officials were fundamental bases on loyalty than skills. The government was inefficient and corrupted. A historian Richard Pipes argues that,”the revolution was the result not of insufferable conditions but of irreconcilable attitudes of a clash between those who wanted sweeping changes in government and a government whose ruler refused to change anything”(Collapse of Tsarist Russia). Tsar refused to change his government and Russia were based on his own ideas. Tsar Nicholas II try to create a government for the citizens to help them obtain liberty and fairness. Nicholas felt that his ruling was divine rights that he try to striped away or undermine the Duma of their power. He refused to give anyone his power. He wanted to preserve as much autocracy; a system of government by one people with absolute power. He created a group called the Duma; without any political power. Nicholas II repressed opposition by while or executing his foe; the Duma met once before Tsar eliminated them. Russia was constantly changing; many citizens had different opinion about what the government should be; but …show more content…
He was unqualified to govern Russia because he did not allow Russia to be more modernized and they lack industrialization. The citizens suffered and were treated as slave; they decides to revolt against Tsar. Additionally, Tsar’s wanted extreme power. He refused to share that power with anyone also not doing his job correctly. Also, his poor leadership in war led to the Russian revolution. The lesson not learned by Tsar Nicholas II is to listen to others opinion and not be selfish and conceited about the amount of power. The Russian Revolution is one example of a weak leader mistakes because of his reckless, naive and
During the pre revolutionary Russian revolution was incompetent; Nicholas could not manage Russia’s vast population and stop anyone who oppose or try to help him. He was always suspicious of anyone that might pose a threat to his sovereignty. Additionally, his advisors and top officials were fundamental bases on loyalty than skills. The government was inefficient and corrupted. A historian Richard Pipes argues that,”the revolution was the result not of insufferable conditions but of irreconcilable attitudes of a clash between those who wanted sweeping changes in government and a government whose ruler refused to change anything”(Collapse of Tsarist Russia). Tsar refused to change his government and Russia were based on his own ideas. Tsar Nicholas II try to create a government for the citizens to help them obtain liberty and fairness. Nicholas felt that his ruling was divine rights that he try to striped away or undermine the Duma of their power. He refused to give anyone his power. He wanted to preserve as much autocracy; a system of government by one people with absolute power. He created a group called the Duma; without any political power. Nicholas II repressed opposition by while or executing his foe; the Duma met once before Tsar eliminated them. Russia was constantly changing; many citizens had different opinion about what the government should be; but …show more content…
He was unqualified to govern Russia because he did not allow Russia to be more modernized and they lack industrialization. The citizens suffered and were treated as slave; they decides to revolt against Tsar. Additionally, Tsar’s wanted extreme power. He refused to share that power with anyone also not doing his job correctly. Also, his poor leadership in war led to the Russian revolution. The lesson not learned by Tsar Nicholas II is to listen to others opinion and not be selfish and conceited about the amount of power. The Russian Revolution is one example of a weak leader mistakes because of his reckless, naive and