In the article, “Uber Regulations Would Stifle the Transportation Free Market”, the author is trying to convey the point that regulations on the companies such as Uber and Lyft will only benefit the insurance companies while actually hurting the free market of transportation because this will cause less people to use the car-sharing and thus make the companies move out of California. The following essay will break down the article in order to give the reader an understanding of the author’s main argument and to point out the validity of the argument and whether the argumentation contains fallacious propositions. Then this essay will give ways at which the argumentations can be changed in order to make the argumentation stronger. Before breaking down the argument into syllogism form and pointing out its validity this paper will make the reader aware of the fallacious argumentation within the article. When looking at the fifth paragraph in the article it states that “Without such proof, it’s fair to wonder if this legislative push is really about public safety or about attempting to stifle
…show more content…
Premise 1: If the two bills are passed by the state legislature, then online car-sharing hubs will be heavily regulated.
Premise 2: If the online car-sharing hubs are heavily regulated, then there is a possibility that there will be a decrease in market competition.
Conclusion 1: Therefore if the two bills are passed to regulate the online car-sharing hubs, then there is a possibility that there will be a decrease in market competition.
Premise 1: If the two bills are passed by the state legislature, then online car-sharing hubs will be required to have around the clock insurance coverage.
Premise 2: If the online car sharing hubs are required to have around the clock insurance coverage, then the insurance companies will be the only to
Premise 1: If the two bills are passed by the state legislature, then online car-sharing hubs will be heavily regulated.
Premise 2: If the online car-sharing hubs are heavily regulated, then there is a possibility that there will be a decrease in market competition.
Conclusion 1: Therefore if the two bills are passed to regulate the online car-sharing hubs, then there is a possibility that there will be a decrease in market competition.
Premise 1: If the two bills are passed by the state legislature, then online car-sharing hubs will be required to have around the clock insurance coverage.
Premise 2: If the online car sharing hubs are required to have around the clock insurance coverage, then the insurance companies will be the only to