Per the Oxford Dictionary of English, pluralism is “a condition or system in which two or more states, groups, principles, sources of authority, etc., coexist.” Thus, one could argue that virtually every nation on this planet always displays some degree of pluralism. However, pluralism and multiculturalism are regarded individually as well as disparately by different individuals, because president-elect Donald Trump, the people of Vietnam, and the right-wing populists of Europe might all give their own, separate answer. To give an account of these answers along with how they can be put in the prodigious context that is the global community, the answers shall all be reflected upon prior to concluding said reflections with a short summary.
To …show more content…
While emerging economies such as those found in Africa and Asia are favourable towards these global occurrences, nations with the stagnating economic growth often found in Europe appear to experience a rise in pessimism on these issues. Perhaps the majority of Europeans may not yet share this pessimistic opinion; however, the consequences might become severe. Since in the event that a sizeable economy such as France were to adopt anti-globalisation policies in an effort to stimulate economic growth, it might both happen on hateful premises in addition to having devastating consequences for the intertwined global economy. Toleration of others, including a continued effort to understand cultures as well as nations, is crucial to uphold a fair distribution of resources while maintaining the global economy. As Mrs. Eck puts it on pluralism.org: “Pluralism is (…) the active seeking of understanding across lines of difference.” The correlation between pluralism and globalisation might have to be communicated clearer to western nations, as these terms seem to be connected, not …show more content…
Moreover, these attitudes appear inextricably connected to economic growth as well as decline. While right-wing politicians such as Trump and Le Pen thrive in the stagnating economies of the USA and France, this kind of shift in the political paradigm remains uninitiated in Asian nations, which are in a state of economic growth. Although Trump, along with Le Pen, is riding the current political wave, it might collapse sooner or later. As identified by Eck, pluralism is not easy to obtain; Besides, it does not seem to boast any significant negative qualities. Therefore, it could be possible to assume that other politicians in the future will pick up on the idea of pluralism once again, not leave it be. After all, the coming generation seemed statistically more positive towards globalisation and its wonders than their
To …show more content…
While emerging economies such as those found in Africa and Asia are favourable towards these global occurrences, nations with the stagnating economic growth often found in Europe appear to experience a rise in pessimism on these issues. Perhaps the majority of Europeans may not yet share this pessimistic opinion; however, the consequences might become severe. Since in the event that a sizeable economy such as France were to adopt anti-globalisation policies in an effort to stimulate economic growth, it might both happen on hateful premises in addition to having devastating consequences for the intertwined global economy. Toleration of others, including a continued effort to understand cultures as well as nations, is crucial to uphold a fair distribution of resources while maintaining the global economy. As Mrs. Eck puts it on pluralism.org: “Pluralism is (…) the active seeking of understanding across lines of difference.” The correlation between pluralism and globalisation might have to be communicated clearer to western nations, as these terms seem to be connected, not …show more content…
Moreover, these attitudes appear inextricably connected to economic growth as well as decline. While right-wing politicians such as Trump and Le Pen thrive in the stagnating economies of the USA and France, this kind of shift in the political paradigm remains uninitiated in Asian nations, which are in a state of economic growth. Although Trump, along with Le Pen, is riding the current political wave, it might collapse sooner or later. As identified by Eck, pluralism is not easy to obtain; Besides, it does not seem to boast any significant negative qualities. Therefore, it could be possible to assume that other politicians in the future will pick up on the idea of pluralism once again, not leave it be. After all, the coming generation seemed statistically more positive towards globalisation and its wonders than their