The existence of God has been a talked subject for more than 100 decades. Throughout this time we’ve managed to take a step forward into finalizing the question once and for all. We have the cosmological view and teleological view that help us understand if we do believe on God or if we don’t. There are two types of people in this world. One that doesn’t need proof to understand that there is a God. and the other that need logic to understand if there is a God. I don’t consider myself an atheist because I do believe in a God. My whole family would lecture me worse and the jehovah witness if i 'm a little skeptical about it but there are some questions I’ve had throughout my entire childhood and this essay will help me finalize my thoughts
…show more content…
These arguments were initially projected by Thomas Aquinas. The first statement concludes how there must be motion. Motion is evident to our senses therefore it must exist. The problem with this argument is that everything that is moved is also moved by something from the outside. Another problem can be that we have an infinite amount of movers. Lastly for the first part of the argument would be that an unmoved mover must exist also nothing can move itself. The second part of his argument applies, “There must be a first uncaused cause of the causal series.= God.” (Pursley, Mark) This initially says that everything that exists has a purpose to it. Also, that nothing that we care aware or conscious about is the making of itself but of God. Now, for the third part of the argument it talks about how a variety of things are contingent. There is a subject to change to every human being that exists but at one point there was nothing. Therefore that there must be something necessary which is God. The fourth way implies that there is a scale or spectrum of things that might be good and some might be bad. For example fire is the hottest of all things hot so it 's the cause of all things. So if fire is the hottest of all hot things it 's the genius of it. This leads us to the genius of all causes which is God himself. For the fifth and most important part of his argument is
These arguments were initially projected by Thomas Aquinas. The first statement concludes how there must be motion. Motion is evident to our senses therefore it must exist. The problem with this argument is that everything that is moved is also moved by something from the outside. Another problem can be that we have an infinite amount of movers. Lastly for the first part of the argument would be that an unmoved mover must exist also nothing can move itself. The second part of his argument applies, “There must be a first uncaused cause of the causal series.= God.” (Pursley, Mark) This initially says that everything that exists has a purpose to it. Also, that nothing that we care aware or conscious about is the making of itself but of God. Now, for the third part of the argument it talks about how a variety of things are contingent. There is a subject to change to every human being that exists but at one point there was nothing. Therefore that there must be something necessary which is God. The fourth way implies that there is a scale or spectrum of things that might be good and some might be bad. For example fire is the hottest of all things hot so it 's the cause of all things. So if fire is the hottest of all hot things it 's the genius of it. This leads us to the genius of all causes which is God himself. For the fifth and most important part of his argument is