Arguments For Euthanasia Essay

Improved Essays
1. Discuss the arguments made by people in favor of euthanasia.

There are several arguments made for euthanasia. The main argument would be it is for the better; it is to stop the suffering. If you were in excruciating pain would you want to prolong that feeling? Do you have a high tolerance for pain? For some people they have appointed guardians or tell family members what they would want. In the case Spahn v. Eisenberg, Spahn the sister also the court appointed guardian, argued that her sister Edna would not have wanted to live in this vegetative state where she needed to be tube fed. So another argument could have been this is a condition where the patient is not actually living their life the machines are. Other arguments could be about financial costs. It is not bad enough that most hospital visits are expensive, but if there was a relative that was in a state for no hope of recovery, why keep paying these heavy expenses of machinery? Especially if you’re loved one will never be the same or awaken. There is also the quality-of-life judgment it talks about how it is our right to die. Each argument for euthanasia there is an argument against it; your beliefs are your own.

2. Discuss the arguments made by people in opposition to euthanasia.

Similar to the arguments
…show more content…
There are many different things you could say, but most won’t make the person feel any better. It is important to take their religion into consideration, depending on whether or not they believe in the after life or even just a god you can build something to say. I know a lot of people would say it’s all apart of god’s plan or god only gives us what we can handle, but in this situation I would refrain from those things. Maybe one should just stay there and comfort the patient, or maybe help them recognize that there will be less pain after death. Let them know that they are not going through this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “The whole notion of pain, and how every individual experiences pain, is up for debate. We don 't know how another person experiences pain - physical pain or psychic pain. Some of these clinics where assisted suicide or euthanasia is practiced, they call it 'weariness of life. '” (Toews). For many years, those dubbed with the burden of cancer and other terminal illnesses have to suffer through a slow and painful death in the end.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then I will utilize aspects of James Rachels paper, “The Morality of Euthanasia”, in order to illustrate how active euthanasia can be morally permissible. Afterward, I will explain some aspects of my argument that others might find fault in and refute…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the past decade, an average of fifty-five percent of terminally ill patients died in pain (Seth). Thousands and thousands of people are diagnosed with cancer or other diseases that can put them in a difficult situation if death comes into play. Constant debate of Physician-Assisted Suicide and/or Euthanasia has caused a spark within the medical industry, causing more hospitals and medical facilities to accommodate special request from terminally ill patients. Within the majority of society, many agree that this is morally wrong; but, what many people don’t understand is what these patients mentally and physically have to endure when making end of life decisions. Which leads to the question, is it truly ethical to help a terminally ill…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reported cases of suicide due to terminal illness have been on the rise. Today, there is an increase in terminal illnesses that have plagued our communities. Cancer, ALS, and diabetes are all among some of these illnesses that people suffer from each and every day. For some, to be told that it is unlawful to take your own life due to the suffering you are experiencing, is overwhelming in the least. As a person, we make our own choices and decisions everyday regarding our health, and our families.…

    • 2187 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Of Euthanasia

    • 1751 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When looking into sources getting different views can greatly broaden the view of the reader and also the author which allows them to make an educated and logical argument on the subject. The topic of physician assisted suicide has many different sides to its argument which makes it a prime candidate in getting opposing views for research. It brings into question the morals and integrity of doctors, and also the morals of the patients and families that choose physician assisted suicide. Many people see it as tarnishing the value of human life, while others believe it gives a person one of their most basic human rights to choose how their body is handled. These types of arguments can change the views of a person when they thought they had come to the right conclusion, which shows the importance of doing in-depth research.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When are we as human beings allowed to die? Should we leave the decision of whether we suffer for years with debilitating illnesses and diseases with no chances of a cure or die an earlier death with a little of our dignity and financial security intact, up to legislation? These are some of the questions brought to light in one of the most highly debated medical ethics questions. There are many factors that play into both sides that support the argument of the legalization of euthanasia. With that, there are many methods to carrying out this act in a controlled manner.…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pro Euthanasia Essay

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia Euthanasia is an extremely controversial aspect in today’s world. Euthanasia is the act of assisted suicide to end a life of suffering. However, it is debated under circumstances on whether it should be legal or not. Although Euthanasia is not morally correct, it’s necessary in certain situations. While modern medicine can replace euthanasia and end suffering, sometimes people become so ill their condition is hopeless.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following three arguments will subsequently be anaylzed in the philosophical context of moral theories put forth by Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. The first argument in favour of permitting euthanasia is that when an individual is suffering from a terminal disease or unbearable pain, it it seen as morally just to allow them to terminate their life, rather than forcing them to continue suffering. Euthanasia in this scenario is perceived as a humanitarian solution through…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voluntary Euthanasia should be legalized because a person should have a right to die with dignity rather than continue a life of pain and suffering. I believe that a tremendous ill patient has the constitutional right to decide whether they should continue to fit or not. There’s some illness a person cannot handle even with the best pain reliever, or when the person lost all the tolerance and control of his or her body. Euthanasia is the only compassionate solution. Euthanasia is basically justified as a relieving unbearable suffering, as long as the patient request it.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On the morning of November 1, a young woman named Brittany Maynard ended her life in Oregon. Her diagnosis was brain cancer; doctors told her she had several years to live. Unfortunately, after further tests doctors informed her that she had about 6 months to live. She decided that she would choose to end her life after the pain of her condition became unbearable. She stated that being able to choose when to die allowed her to live (Slotnik).…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Right to Die” is this a choice or is this a choice that society should be allowed to make? The controversy over someone choosing to end their life when dealing with a terminal illness with a physician’s help is the rights of the patient and not the right of society to choose. People who are dealing with terminal illness should have a choice to die or not with their doctor’s help. In a physician-assistant suicide the doctor prescribes the medication that will end a patient’s life, but the patient has to be able to take the medication which will result in death.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is for this reason, that it is important for society to consider the quality of a person’s life and therefore allow them to choose euthanasia as a way to die as the person…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays