What Are The Arguments For And Against Gun Control Essay

Superior Essays
Gun control has been a big controversial topic for ages. With an increase in violence and the selling of guns reaching a high many people believe that the government should restrict the sale of guns to help prevent tragic events from happening. However, many others believe that the government should not restrict the sale and possession of guns as it would violate rights and not only increase violence, but prevent citizens from defending themselves if ever faced with a violent occurrence. Due to such diverse opinions this controversy will be very hard to resolve for both current leaders and future ones.

A big argument for the restriction on selling guns is the fact that crime rates could go down. With limited access to guns means less crime as most crime in the United States of America occurs with guns and after all a criminal would be perceived as more
…show more content…
In which that restricting guns would not make a difference at all. The mafia and gangsters such as Al Capone in the 1920 's would not have stopped fighting if guns would have been banned (“Gun Control Won 't Stop Terrorist Attacks."). They will find a way to acquire them illegally instead, doing nothing to stop the amount of crime from occurring. People will always find a way to acquire guns illegally and if people can, they will use other things in order to do what these criminals intend to do. The amount of crime and terrorist attacks will not go down, but stay the same if not increase. This also applies to the amount of suicides in the United States. Though it will not do anything to prevent someone’s kid from getting a hold of a gun it should be the parent of the kids responsibility to keep the gun away from the kid not the laws. Limiting and restricting guns wouldn 't help anything as there is always an alternative, way for criminals to get the crimes done which is why the United States should take away a lot of gun

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a perfect world we would be able to get control, or better yet never have invented such a violent weapon. It is too late for that now, guns are out there among our citizen, and I do not see anyway of regaining control of them. Any attempt would only take guns away from law abiding citizens not from the criminals. Stricter gun laws will not stop people from going into schools or movies theaters and shooting mass numbers of people. These people obviously have no issue with breaking laws, therefore laws will not stop them.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control: Unconstitutional or Constructive? In a nation of differing opinions, a few issues stick out. Gun control is one of them, a widely debated subject punctuated by acts of heinous violence. In an attempt to curb this violence, articles such as “Crime, Deterrence, and Right‐to‐Carry Concealed Handguns”, by John Lott, argue that less gun control would lead to less crime. The other side of the coin argues that more gun control would lead to less violence, and this is the argument that the article “GUN CONTROL AFTER HELLER AND MCDONALD: WHAT CANNOT BE DONE AND WHAT OUGHT TO BE DONE”, by Gary Kleck, takes.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Concealed carry is a law that has been in controversy for several decades. A majority of people say that not being able to carry a gun is violating their rights. Others say that they don 't feel safe when there are guns around and can cause more harm than good. The use of concealed and carry weapons could reduce the number of mass shootings by making criminals not want to commit the crimes because the people who are armed would be able to defend themselves. To understand concealed and carry, people need to understand what gun control really is.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Similarly, criminals do not care laws as they illegally do many other things. Criminals will still find a way to obtain guns if they want to do, and it makes other citizens without any weapons to use in defense. Also, gun control will create another income resources of criminals. They create black markets to sell illegal guns, and it will surely develop. Moreover, guns are not the only weapons that criminals use.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The controversial argument concerning gun control has become a nationwide issue in the United States due to numerous amounts of shootings and incidents that have inflicted activist to finally step up in 2012 for and against gun control. Many believe gun control has pulled the nation apart and that’s exactly what it has done. Activist for gun control have fought to disband citizens’ rights to have arms, to try and lessen the amounts of shootings and protect the nation. While others, who refute gun control activists’ views, believe this will only infuriate criminals and that it is also taking away the rights of citizens and the right to bear arms. Gun control is a cover up where people have become scared and they believe that the best way…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    If gun control fails, people can fight back using their own guns. Not only that, but if criminals know civilians have guns, they would be in fear of being shot and would not attempt illegal acts. This not only will decrease crime, but also decrease how many people are killed by criminals. To be honest, I thinks that more police officers are needed, along with marines on rooftops. With criminals in fear of being shot with lethal and nonlethal weapons, they won’t commit crimes.With soldiers on the rooftops, they could spot a crime as they receive a message and they use their tranquilizer weapons.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning handguns will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns. What these laws will do however is keep perfectly right minded law abiding citizens from defending themselves. Without Handguns citizens are left much more vulnerable. If a ban on handguns went into place the only people that would break the law to obtain a handgun would be the criminals themselves. A law abiding citizen would not go out of their way to obtain a handgun and break the law, making them the only people without some means self-defense.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe this is a better idea because criminals tend to not follow the law. By putting more restrictions, it could possibly hurt the citizens because they’re unable to protect themselves. According to Marco Rubio, a republican senator, stated, “My skepticism about gun laws is criminals don’t follow the law. They don’t care what the law is, you can pass any law you want and criminals won’t follow it.” I believe Marco Rubio has a good point because if they’re going to commit an illegal crime, they’re not going to legally register the gun. Mass shootings are a big issue due to the large amount of deaths, but this relates to Rubio’s statement because it won’t stop…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays