You said you have advocated the school ‘the same level of protection as our jewelry stores and sport stadiums’ – but by using what means you could protect the schoolchildren from other schoolchildren with evil intention and suicidal determination, such as the murderers of Columbine massacre? The traumatized teenagers who sought for revenge and killed 13 people in the presence of an armed guard? You would realize that the armed guards may fail to overcome the assailants; even if they are seen as a threat to them, their feverish desire to kill would not prevent the attack from happening although it means self-destruction. And obviously – the source of the guns – where they brought under the impression of your so-called ‘law-abiding people’, and you still have the confidence to introduce and reassure the impenetrable defense to people your association provides? Not that I would believe so. Additionally, another of your suggestion to allow teachers the access to the gun, ‘Teacher themselves can be easily trained to use a firearm and keep it in a safe and concealed place’, has contradicted with the case of Ford Hood shooting. To bring back your reminiscence, here I provide the very report in concision: A disturbed army psychiatrist, Major Hasan, entered the base shot at other soldiers, 13 people died along with 30 of others who were injured. You see, even the professionals who are taught and have been trained regularly to use guns are mortal to an unexpected threat involving armaments. Base on this fact alone, how could you expect the untrained gun owners or unarmed civilians to feel secure while there are countless guns in the possession of others? While under the instable factors of psychology health and
You said you have advocated the school ‘the same level of protection as our jewelry stores and sport stadiums’ – but by using what means you could protect the schoolchildren from other schoolchildren with evil intention and suicidal determination, such as the murderers of Columbine massacre? The traumatized teenagers who sought for revenge and killed 13 people in the presence of an armed guard? You would realize that the armed guards may fail to overcome the assailants; even if they are seen as a threat to them, their feverish desire to kill would not prevent the attack from happening although it means self-destruction. And obviously – the source of the guns – where they brought under the impression of your so-called ‘law-abiding people’, and you still have the confidence to introduce and reassure the impenetrable defense to people your association provides? Not that I would believe so. Additionally, another of your suggestion to allow teachers the access to the gun, ‘Teacher themselves can be easily trained to use a firearm and keep it in a safe and concealed place’, has contradicted with the case of Ford Hood shooting. To bring back your reminiscence, here I provide the very report in concision: A disturbed army psychiatrist, Major Hasan, entered the base shot at other soldiers, 13 people died along with 30 of others who were injured. You see, even the professionals who are taught and have been trained regularly to use guns are mortal to an unexpected threat involving armaments. Base on this fact alone, how could you expect the untrained gun owners or unarmed civilians to feel secure while there are countless guns in the possession of others? While under the instable factors of psychology health and