The Argumentative Essay: The Bill Of Rights

Improved Essays
Patrick Henry once stated, “ Give me liberty or give me death.” This known statement was extremely popular within rural America(anti-federalist). The Philadelphia convention was dominated by commercial interest, thus the further the state was from the coast the higher the chances the people in that region would be anti-federalist. Anti-Federalist pseudonyms were Brutus, Cato, and Federal Farmers, as this demonstrated the lack of freedom. The most concerning issue within that party was the fear of tyranny by the government. Their argument was that there would be lack of representation of the people, with a stronger central government. Thus if the contusion added the Bill of Right there would be the sovereignty of the states and rights to the …show more content…
Therefore, Hamilton and Madison added the 9th amendment to the document to pass the constitution(get the votes of anti-federalist) and to prevent future misinterpretations. The 9th amendment is most recognized as the silent amendment. However, basic rights such as the Right to Travel hasn't been specified in the Bill of Right or even thought about over the past decades. But with the recent death of Otto Warmbier, the Trump's administration has banned American citizen to travel to North Korea. Thus if an American citizen wishes to travel to the Hermit country they have to take it to court and argue their point by using the 9th amendment. (1)However, since there are not a written foundations for interpreting the rights covered in the amendment, it is up to the court to decide what is and what is not covered. Since there is much controversy, even among leaders in the court system, there has never been a judicial decision made on the basis of the amendment alone. The amendment has simply been cited in certain cases. (2) For instance in the cases of West Coast Hotel vs. Parrish(1937) the court had rejected the idea that the constitution protects “substantive rights,” protects certain activities from government interference that are not explicitly mentioned in the Bill of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The battle to ratify the constitution quickly fell into two camps; the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists defended ratification of the constitution as it was written with the Anti-Federalists arguing against ratification for a number of reasons. The battle lines had been drawn, however, the arguments were far from consolidated; especially within the camp of the Anti-Federalists. Additionally, both sides took to media outlets to argue their positions where the written word on the argument of ratification played heavy on the side of the Federalists. Arguments against ratification brought forth by the Anti-Federalists were many and centered primarily on a long standing hostility to a stronger central government.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As the nation has evolved, the interpretation of the Constitution has varied. While the Sixth Amendment has been largely upheld in most domestic cases, in fact it has routinely been denied to those who are entitled to its protection when the government deems the situation as a threat to national security. Similarly, the understanding of the Eighth Amendment has been strictly interpreted in matters of domestic law, but the meaning is deviated from in cases where national security has taken the…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment states that the people are granted freedom of speech. However, people are always questioning to what extent that amendment is applied to things. In Citizens United v. F.E.C., the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional for the government to censor political broadcasts for elections that were funded by corporations or unions. The Supreme Court ruled incorrectly in Citizens United v. F.E.C. because corporations are not a single person. Their power drowns out the voices of the people and they have an unfair advantage because they have a lot of money.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The advantage given to the federal government to regulate state laws is not idealistic – the powers are divided to protect the nation from one body reigning over it. But Amendment 14 protects the people as much as the division of powers protects the nation; its power to preside over Amendment 10 to ensure Amendments 1-9 are protected far outweigh any insecurities one may have with its ambiguity. The Fourteenth Amendment may be enigmatic, but it is guarding our right to argue against it. Greene writes that Article Fourteen was a failure, but he would fail to write that without Article…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the ratification debates of the US Constitution, there was conversation over the necessity of a bill of rights to define people’s rights and limit the government’s powers. Many federalists believed such a bill of rights would not only be unnecessary, but would weaken the constitution and the people, and give the government powers they should have. Noah Webster, Alexander Hamilton, and James Wilson each make arguments against a bill of rights. Webster argues that a bill of rights may be irrelevant in future generations, but people will be reluctant to change or add to it. Hamilton believes that the bill of rights is unnecessary because the constitution itself is in terms a bill of rights.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist and anti-Federalist parties disagreed as to how much power the national authority needed, both parties agreed that a national authority was needed and that the national authority would require an individual source of income to function as it should. Both the Federalist and the anti-Federalist Parties also agreed that the people needed protection against dictatorship and other forms of tyranny. Even though neither party completely liked every part of the Constitution, both parties could agree that overall the Constitution was the “best document obtainable”. Federalists were the young, educated men who supported the idea of a centralized federal system and the Constitution’s ratification. They liked the fact that the Constitution could have a “broad interpretation” when situations arose that required such flexibility.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first subject I will be talking about is when the 14th amendment was ratified on July 28, 1868. This amendment grants citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States” which included former slaves who had been freed after the Civil War. The amendment was denied by most of the confederate states because they didn’t want the former slaves to have the right to become a citizen. In their minds the former slaves were not legal citizens because they were brought here to be one thing and one thing only which was slaves. I personally like this amendment because if you were born or admitted into this country I think you should have the right to be a U.S. citizen.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960’s, the meaning of 14th amendment rights have changed and evolved overtime in to what they have become today. First, the issue of race played a key role in defining the role of the 14th amendment in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Second, the Supreme Court used a different interpretation of the 14th amendment to decide rights of privacy in the case of Roe v. Wade that concerned the issue of abortion and rights of women. Lastly, the case of Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 that involves the issues of sexuality and privacy, shows another way that the 14th amendment was interpreted to give everyone the right to free choice. Through examining the way that the 14 amendment was used in each of these cases, it is evident that the meaning and interpretation of this amendment has changed overtime.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is the leading(as in the best amendment) amendment out of the 15 amendments. The Fourth Amendment conserves American rights the most, It protects them from personal stuff being searched, personal belongings taken away and violation of privacy. Many people believe” Now the right to life has come to mean the right to enjoy life, -- the right to be let alone." - Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis, 1890.”…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment? America, a country that used to be defined by bad asses and strong leader, now is defined by the sensitive and stupid. When and if we have a society built of people afraid of answering the hard questions what will we be? People need to speak their minds and stand up for what they believe in. limiting what and where certain topics can be spoken is very unconstitutional. We need to come together as a country so we never have to deal with that problem; because, if we don’t we could see the end of the first amendment and may end up giving away the rest of our rights.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The establishment of the Amendment allows for the prevention of Censorship by the Government. Censorship by the government would take away a large amount of rights for all people. The First Amendment is important as it allows for freedom of expression in entertainment, speech, and politics. The government is trying to censor Television shows from kids.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was created so that the people of America would have the freedom of religion, speech, assembly, press, and petition. The freedom of religion has impacted so many people in many different ways not only in the Unites States. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that everyone in the United States has the right to practice their own religion or practice none at all. Many of America’s founders were from different religious backgrounds and they way they protected religious liberty was to keep the government out of religion. The First Amendment was created as a result to separate church and state.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment of the constitution is the right of free speech; throughout our history the first amendment has been interpreted in a number of ways. Despite this fact all Americans agree that this is one of our most important rights, and lays the foundation for our nations core beliefs. The first amendment is a short statement “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (1) Though it holds a great deal of power, it upholds strong personal values, and sets a precedent for the future of our country.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a nation that prides itself on the concept of freedom, and the backbone of this freedom is the Bill of Rights. Written by former president and founding father James Madison, the Bill of Rights was created in order to ensure and protect each citizen’s individual liberty. While today we recognize twenty-seven amendments, the Bill of Rights is comprised of the original ten constitutional amendments. While some of these ten amendments are more relevant and controversial in today’s day and age than others, they all prove to be vital and unique in their own right.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Analysis

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Assess the view the Bill of rights no longer adequately protects the rights of Americans (25 marks) The first 10 amendments in the Constitution make up the Bill of Rights. The Bill of rights was written by James Madison in response to calls from several states for greater constitutional protection for individual liberties; the Bill of Rights therefore lists specific prohibitions on governmental power. A famous quote about the Bill of rights is “The Bill of Rights wasn’t enacted to give us any rights. It was enacted so the Government could not take away from us any rights that we already had.”…

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays