The Argument That Humans Have An Innate Moral Compass Essay

1032 Words Apr 25th, 2016 null Page
To further the argument that humans have an innate moral compass, we also much touch bases on another key contributor to morality, social awareness and evaluation. Researchers have often argued that social awareness sets the foundation for moral capacity in humans; as we often use social evaluation, just like animals to determine who is friend and who is foe (source 5) As a matter of fact, this behavior has been see in preverbal infants across numerous studies. As exemplified above in addition to other studies, pre-verbal infants have had aversion from perceived aggressors, typically choosing to avoid them in favor of a friendly individual (source 6). In addition, these trends seem to continue as children age, as preschoolers and young children also show the avoidance towards wrongdoers. In particular, one study consisted of seeing how three year olds would react and respond to the actions of an adult towards another. If the adult was harmful to another, the children would selectively avoid this individual and be significantly less likely to share with them when compared to an adult who helped another (Source 7). As we can see, social awareness plays a huge part in morality, as without it we could not evaluate who could be potentially harmful or helpful. Being able to evaluate others and their intentions seems to be an innate sense within young children, since they appear possess the ability to evaluate others from ages as early as three months. This fact by its self proves…

Related Documents